Adopting new habits and routines in response to COVID-19 lockdown disruptions: A qualitative study

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION British Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1177/03080226241232815
Dorothy Kessler, Emma Boudreau, Jennifer Maitland, Rosemary Lysaght, Mary Ann McColl, Libby Alexander, Clarke Wilson, Beata Batorowicz, Vincent DePaul, Catherine Donnelly
{"title":"Adopting new habits and routines in response to COVID-19 lockdown disruptions: A qualitative study","authors":"Dorothy Kessler, Emma Boudreau, Jennifer Maitland, Rosemary Lysaght, Mary Ann McColl, Libby Alexander, Clarke Wilson, Beata Batorowicz, Vincent DePaul, Catherine Donnelly","doi":"10.1177/03080226241232815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:COVID-19-related restrictions resulted in changes to time use and occupational participation, impacting individual and collective well-being. This study addressed a knowledge gap concerning the adaptive process during periods of occupational disruption. We explored the experience of occupational disruption and how people managed disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods:We used a qualitative descriptive approach and interviewed 18 participants of a larger survey study of time use during the COVID-19 pandemic undertaken around a medium-sized city in Canada. Transcript analysis was conducted inductively using conventional content analysis.Findings:Two overarching themes were constructed during data analysis: The Disruption Experience and Adopting New Habits and Routines. In the face of disruption, participants described a sense of loss and disconnection, and challenges with time management. Establishing new habits and routines required new learning associated with increased time and flexibility, connecting with others and health and wellness.Conclusion:During changing pandemic restrictions, participants expressed a sense of loss, disconnection and time management challenges associated with occupational disruptions, but also described ways they adapted, improving their health and well-being. Strategies identified through this work may be used to enhance adaptation during disruptions. Future research should explore differences in adaptation, among more diverse populations.","PeriodicalId":49096,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226241232815","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:COVID-19-related restrictions resulted in changes to time use and occupational participation, impacting individual and collective well-being. This study addressed a knowledge gap concerning the adaptive process during periods of occupational disruption. We explored the experience of occupational disruption and how people managed disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods:We used a qualitative descriptive approach and interviewed 18 participants of a larger survey study of time use during the COVID-19 pandemic undertaken around a medium-sized city in Canada. Transcript analysis was conducted inductively using conventional content analysis.Findings:Two overarching themes were constructed during data analysis: The Disruption Experience and Adopting New Habits and Routines. In the face of disruption, participants described a sense of loss and disconnection, and challenges with time management. Establishing new habits and routines required new learning associated with increased time and flexibility, connecting with others and health and wellness.Conclusion:During changing pandemic restrictions, participants expressed a sense of loss, disconnection and time management challenges associated with occupational disruptions, but also described ways they adapted, improving their health and well-being. Strategies identified through this work may be used to enhance adaptation during disruptions. Future research should explore differences in adaptation, among more diverse populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对 COVID-19 封锁中断事件养成新的习惯和常规:定性研究
导言:与 COVID-19 相关的限制导致了时间利用和职业参与的变化,影响了个人和集体的福祉。本研究填补了有关职业中断期间适应过程的知识空白。方法:我们采用了定性描述的方法,在加拿大的一个中等城市采访了 18 名参与 COVID-19 大流行期间时间使用情况大型调查研究的人员。研究结果:在数据分析过程中,我们发现了两个最重要的主题:研究结果:在数据分析过程中构建了两个主题:中断体验和养成新习惯和常规。面对中断,参与者描述了一种失落感和断裂感,以及时间管理方面的挑战。结论:在大流行病限制不断变化的过程中,参与者表达了一种失落感、断裂感以及与职业中断相关的时间管理方面的挑战,但也描述了他们适应的方式,从而改善了他们的健康和福祉。通过这项工作确定的策略可用于在中断期间加强适应。未来的研究应探索更多不同人群在适应方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT) is the official journal of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists. Its purpose is to publish articles with international relevance that advance knowledge in research, practice, education, and management in occupational therapy. It is a monthly peer reviewed publication that disseminates evidence on the effectiveness, benefit, and value of occupational therapy so that occupational therapists, service users, and key stakeholders can make informed decisions. BJOT publishes research articles, reviews, practice analyses, opinion pieces, editorials, letters to the editor and book reviews. It also regularly publishes special issues on topics relevant to occupational therapy.
期刊最新文献
Supporting patients' autonomy as a mediator between healthcare professionals' basic psychological needs and work meaning. Activity PRN: Establishing meaningful occupation as and when required across acute inpatient mental health and psychiatric intensive care units. Translation and psychometric properties of the autism screening instrument for educational planning 3 in Persian (Farsi). Artificial intelligence in occupational therapy: Comparing ChatGPT and occupational therapist approaches in assessment and intervention. Exploring the emotional labour of occupational therapists when interacting with clients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1