Power and Theory: Structural Racism and Zones of Sanctioned Ignorance

IF 0.8 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER THEATRE JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1353/tj.2023.a922221
Dorinne Kondo
{"title":"Power and Theory: Structural Racism and Zones of Sanctioned Ignorance","authors":"Dorinne Kondo","doi":"10.1353/tj.2023.a922221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Through a case study of the creative process on the thirtieth anniversary revival of Anna Deavere Smith’s <i>Twilight: Los Angeles 1992</i> at the Mark Taper Forum in 2023, this essay argues for centering theories of power in theatre practice as well as scholarship. The limits of mainstream US theatre models manifested in the workings of structural racism and what Gayatri Spivak calls “zones of sanctioned ignorance”—structurally overdetermined blind spots—about race, history, acting theory, and the division of labor in the “creative”/ labor process. Knowledge of cutting-edge “theory,” the continuing critique of our own worldmaking assumptions, and expansive visions of “theory” integrated with “practice” could disrupt mind/body dualism and lead us to reimagine conventional US theatre protocols, opening possibilities for progressive change.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":46247,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2023.a922221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Through a case study of the creative process on the thirtieth anniversary revival of Anna Deavere Smith’s Twilight: Los Angeles 1992 at the Mark Taper Forum in 2023, this essay argues for centering theories of power in theatre practice as well as scholarship. The limits of mainstream US theatre models manifested in the workings of structural racism and what Gayatri Spivak calls “zones of sanctioned ignorance”—structurally overdetermined blind spots—about race, history, acting theory, and the division of labor in the “creative”/ labor process. Knowledge of cutting-edge “theory,” the continuing critique of our own worldmaking assumptions, and expansive visions of “theory” integrated with “practice” could disrupt mind/body dualism and lead us to reimagine conventional US theatre protocols, opening possibilities for progressive change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力与理论:结构性种族主义和受认可的无知区
摘要:本文通过对 2023 年在马克-塔佩尔论坛(Mark Taper Forum)举行的安娜-迪维尔-史密斯(Anna Deavere Smith)的《暮光之城》(Twilight:1992》的创作过程,论证了在戏剧实践和学术研究中以权力理论为中心的观点。美国主流戏剧模式的局限性体现在结构性种族主义的运作以及盖特丽-斯皮瓦克(Gayatri Spivak)所说的 "认可的无知区域"--结构性过度决定的盲点--关于种族、历史、表演理论以及 "创作"/劳动过程中的分工。对前沿 "理论 "的了解,对我们自身创造世界的假设的持续批判,以及对 "理论 "与 "实践 "相结合的广阔愿景,可以打破身心二元论,引导我们重新想象传统的美国戏剧规程,为渐进式变革开辟可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
THEATRE JOURNAL
THEATRE JOURNAL THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
40.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: For over five decades, Theatre Journal"s broad array of scholarly articles and reviews has earned it an international reputation as one of the most authoritative and useful publications of theatre studies available today. Drawing contributions from noted practitioners and scholars, Theatre Journal features social and historical studies, production reviews, and theoretical inquiries that analyze dramatic texts and production.
期刊最新文献
Stereophonic by David Adjmi (review) Natasha, Pierre & the Great Comet of 1812 by Dave Malloy (review) Byggmeister Solness by Henrik Ibsen (review) The Many Voices of Sissieretta Jones: Opera and the Sonic Necromancy of the Black Phonographic Archive National Arts Festival (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1