The role of motor inhibition in implicit negation processing: two Go/No-Go behavioral studies.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s00426-024-01941-0
Martina Montalti, Marta Calbi, Maria Alessandra Umiltà, Vittorio Gallese, Valentina Cuccio
{"title":"The role of motor inhibition in implicit negation processing: two Go/No-Go behavioral studies.","authors":"Martina Montalti, Marta Calbi, Maria Alessandra Umiltà, Vittorio Gallese, Valentina Cuccio","doi":"10.1007/s00426-024-01941-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several studies demonstrated that explicit forms of negation processing (e.g., \"I don't know\") recruits motor inhibitory mechanisms. However, whether this is also true for implicit negation, in which the negative meaning is implicated but not explicitly lexicalized in the sentence (e.g., \"I ignore\"), has never been studied before. Two Go/No-Go studies, which differed only for the time-windows to respond to the Go stimulus, were carried out. In each, participants (N = 86 in experiment 1; N = 87 in experiment 2) respond to coloured circle while reading task-irrelevant affirmative, explicit negative and implicit negative sentences. We aimed to investigate whether: (i) the processing of implicit negations recruits inhibitory mechanisms; (ii) these inhibitory resources are differently modulated by implicit and explicit negations. Results show that implicit negative sentences recruit the inhibitory resources more strongly when compared to explicit ones, probably due to their inferential nature, likely requiring deeper processing of the negative meaning. Implicit and inferential meaning (i.e., pragmatic information) are grounded too in the same mechanisms that integrate action with perception. Such findings provide further evidence to the embodied account of language, showing that even abstract aspects, like implicit negation, are grounded in the sensory-motor system, by means of functional link between language and motor activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01941-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies demonstrated that explicit forms of negation processing (e.g., "I don't know") recruits motor inhibitory mechanisms. However, whether this is also true for implicit negation, in which the negative meaning is implicated but not explicitly lexicalized in the sentence (e.g., "I ignore"), has never been studied before. Two Go/No-Go studies, which differed only for the time-windows to respond to the Go stimulus, were carried out. In each, participants (N = 86 in experiment 1; N = 87 in experiment 2) respond to coloured circle while reading task-irrelevant affirmative, explicit negative and implicit negative sentences. We aimed to investigate whether: (i) the processing of implicit negations recruits inhibitory mechanisms; (ii) these inhibitory resources are differently modulated by implicit and explicit negations. Results show that implicit negative sentences recruit the inhibitory resources more strongly when compared to explicit ones, probably due to their inferential nature, likely requiring deeper processing of the negative meaning. Implicit and inferential meaning (i.e., pragmatic information) are grounded too in the same mechanisms that integrate action with perception. Such findings provide further evidence to the embodied account of language, showing that even abstract aspects, like implicit negation, are grounded in the sensory-motor system, by means of functional link between language and motor activity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动抑制在内隐性否定加工中的作用:两项 Go/No-Go 行为研究。
一些研究表明,显性形式的否定处理(如 "我不知道")会调动运动抑制机制。然而,这种情况是否也适用于隐性否定,即否定意义在句子中隐含但未明确词汇化(如 "我不理"),以前从未有过研究。我们进行了两项围棋/非围棋研究,这两项研究仅在对围棋刺激做出反应的时间窗口上有所不同。在每项研究中,参与者(实验 1:86 人;实验 2:87 人)在阅读与任务无关的肯定句、明确否定句和隐含否定句时对彩色圆圈做出反应。我们的目的是研究:(i) 对隐性否定句的处理是否会动用抑制机制;(ii) 这些抑制资源是否会受到隐性否定句和显性否定句的不同调节。结果表明,与显性否定句相比,隐性否定句更强烈地调动了抑制性资源,这可能是由于它们的推断性质,可能需要对否定意义进行更深层次的处理。内隐意义和推断意义(即语用信息)也是基于将行动与感知整合在一起的相同机制。这些发现进一步证明了语言的体现论,表明即使是抽象的方面,如隐含的否定,也是通过语言和运动活动之间的功能联系,以感觉-运动系统为基础的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Correction: How do emotions respond to outcome values and influence choice? The ownership memory self-reference effect shifts recognition criterion but not recognition sensitivity. Effect of additional tasks on the reaction time of braking responses in simulated car driving: beyond the PRP effect. Impact of aging on crossmodal attention switching. A kinematically complex multi-articular motor skill for investigating implicit motor learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1