Critical race digital literacy rubric for assessing mis/disinformation literacy instruction lesson plans

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Academic Librarianship Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102868
Melissa Chomintra
{"title":"Critical race digital literacy rubric for assessing mis/disinformation literacy instruction lesson plans","authors":"Melissa Chomintra","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While librarians have been at the forefront of the fight against fake news, misinformation, and disinformation, offering invaluable guidance and tools through information literacy instruction, there is a noteworthy gap in the adoption of pedagogical approaches rooted in critical theory within mis/disinformation literacy lesson plans. This suggests there may not be well-defined or standardized frameworks for incorporating these theories into library instruction. The enclosed article explores Critical Race Digital Literacy (CRDL) as a pedagogical approach to mis/disinformation literacy education by proposing a rubric for assessing mis/disinformation lesson plans. The rubric is grounded in the principles of critical race theory, emphasizing the importance of addressing power dynamics, ideology, and systemic white supremacy in the digital landscape. Through the application of the CRDL rubric instructors are able to employ critically reflexive teaching and engage in continual self-assessment, fostering a culture of pedagogical deconstruction and reflection that shifts the focus from scoring to meaningful reflection and growth. The CRDL rubric has the potential to be used as a tool for transformative praxis, empowering librarians to navigate, question, and reshape the narrative within the ever-evolving landscape of information literacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While librarians have been at the forefront of the fight against fake news, misinformation, and disinformation, offering invaluable guidance and tools through information literacy instruction, there is a noteworthy gap in the adoption of pedagogical approaches rooted in critical theory within mis/disinformation literacy lesson plans. This suggests there may not be well-defined or standardized frameworks for incorporating these theories into library instruction. The enclosed article explores Critical Race Digital Literacy (CRDL) as a pedagogical approach to mis/disinformation literacy education by proposing a rubric for assessing mis/disinformation lesson plans. The rubric is grounded in the principles of critical race theory, emphasizing the importance of addressing power dynamics, ideology, and systemic white supremacy in the digital landscape. Through the application of the CRDL rubric instructors are able to employ critically reflexive teaching and engage in continual self-assessment, fostering a culture of pedagogical deconstruction and reflection that shifts the focus from scoring to meaningful reflection and growth. The CRDL rubric has the potential to be used as a tool for transformative praxis, empowering librarians to navigate, question, and reshape the narrative within the ever-evolving landscape of information literacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估错误/虚假信息扫盲教学教案的关键种族数字扫盲评分标准
尽管图书馆员一直站在打击假新闻、错误信息和虚假信息的最前沿,通过信息扫盲教学提供了宝贵的指导和工具,但在错误/虚假信息扫盲课程计划中采用植根于批判理论的教学方法方面却存在着值得注意的差距。这表明,将这些理论纳入图书馆教学可能还没有定义明确或标准化的框架。所附文章通过提出评估误读/误导课程计划的标准,探讨了作为误读/误导扫盲教育教学方法的批判性种族数字扫盲(CRDL)。该标准以批判种族理论的原则为基础,强调在数字环境中解决权力动态、意识形态和系统性白人至上问题的重要性。通过应用 CRDL 评分标准,教师能够采用批判性的反思教学,并进行持续的自我评估,培养一种教学解构和反思文化,将重点从评分转向有意义的反思和成长。CRDL 评分标准有可能被用作变革性实践的工具,使图书馆员有能力在不断发展的信息扫盲领域中导航、质疑和重塑叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
期刊最新文献
Understanding feelings, thoughts, and actions: Social work students and individual research consultations Growth of Knowledge Synthesis in a University Setting: Types, Disciplines, and Librarian Involvement An interdisciplinary assessment of information literacy instruction A holistic approach to understanding undergraduates: Campus engagement, library use and psychological factors The lifecycle of 3D data in academic libraries: A survey of methods and implications for information professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1