Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Improving Motor Function After Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.03.001
Shan Xie MS , Yuqian Zhang MD , Jing Li MS , Zhefan Wu BS , Yulong Bai MD
{"title":"Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Improving Motor Function After Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Shan Xie MS ,&nbsp;Yuqian Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Jing Li MS ,&nbsp;Zhefan Wu BS ,&nbsp;Yulong Bai MD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate the effect of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation<span> (CCFES) on motor function after acquired brain injury (ABI).</span></div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals and Wanfang Database, from inception to December 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials<span> assessing the effect of CCFES on motor function compared with routine rehabilitation or routine electrical stimulation after ABI. Two independent reviewers screened 894 articles for inclusion.</span></div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>The extracted data included study information, sample size, study population, interventions, measurement evaluated, and the test interval.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>This study included 24 trials with 28 intervention-control pairs and 1148 participants with stroke. Meta-analysis showed that the CCFES group demonstrated more significant improvement than the control group in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FMA) (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.44-0.88, <em>P</em>&lt;.001), active range of motion (AROM) (SMD=0.77, 95% CI=0.54-1.01, <em>P</em><span>&lt;.001), modified Barthel Index (MBI) (SMD=0.55, 95% CI=0.29-0.81, </span><em>P</em>&lt;.001), Motricity Index (MI) (SMD=0.60, 95% CI=0.26-0.94, <em>P</em><span>&lt;.001) surface electromyography (sEMG) (SMD=0.81, 95% CI=0.56-1.06, </span><em>P</em>&lt;.001), and Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) (SMD=0.53, 95% CI=0.24-0.83, <em>P</em>&lt;.001). The CCFES group showed no significant improvement over the control group in the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) (SMD=0.24, 95% CI=-0.10-0.58, <em>P</em>=.17).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our synthesized evidence suggests that CCFES could improve motor function in patients with stroke. More RCTs with other patients with brain injury are required to provide future evidence on the therapy effect of CCFES and make a contribution to the uniform standard of CCFES.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"105 12","pages":"Pages 2327-2335"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324008827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To systematically evaluate the effect of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) on motor function after acquired brain injury (ABI).

Data Sources

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals and Wanfang Database, from inception to December 2023.

Study Selection

Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of CCFES on motor function compared with routine rehabilitation or routine electrical stimulation after ABI. Two independent reviewers screened 894 articles for inclusion.

Data Extraction

The extracted data included study information, sample size, study population, interventions, measurement evaluated, and the test interval.

Data Synthesis

This study included 24 trials with 28 intervention-control pairs and 1148 participants with stroke. Meta-analysis showed that the CCFES group demonstrated more significant improvement than the control group in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FMA) (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.44-0.88, P<.001), active range of motion (AROM) (SMD=0.77, 95% CI=0.54-1.01, P<.001), modified Barthel Index (MBI) (SMD=0.55, 95% CI=0.29-0.81, P<.001), Motricity Index (MI) (SMD=0.60, 95% CI=0.26-0.94, P<.001) surface electromyography (sEMG) (SMD=0.81, 95% CI=0.56-1.06, P<.001), and Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) (SMD=0.53, 95% CI=0.24-0.83, P<.001). The CCFES group showed no significant improvement over the control group in the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) (SMD=0.24, 95% CI=-0.10-0.58, P=.17).

Conclusions

Our synthesized evidence suggests that CCFES could improve motor function in patients with stroke. More RCTs with other patients with brain injury are required to provide future evidence on the therapy effect of CCFES and make a contribution to the uniform standard of CCFES.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善后天性脑损伤后运动功能的对侧控制功能性电刺激:系统回顾与元分析》(Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Improving Motor Function after Acquired Brain Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis)。
目的系统评估对侧控制功能性电刺激(CCFES)对获得性脑损伤(ABI)后运动功能的影响:数据来源:我们检索了Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央注册、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)、Web of Science、SinoMed、CNKI、中国科技期刊VIP数据库和万方数据库,检索时间从开始至2023年12月:如果研究是评估CCFES与常规康复或常规电刺激相比对ABI后运动功能影响的随机对照试验,则纳入研究。两名独立审稿人筛选了894篇文章纳入研究:提取的数据包括研究信息、样本量、研究人群、干预措施、评估的测量方法和测试间隔:本研究共纳入 24 项试验,28 对干预-对照,1148 名中风患者。Meta分析表明,CCFES组在Fugl-Meyer评估量表(FMA)方面比对照组有更显著的改善(标准化平均差(SMD)=0.66,95%置信区间(CI)=0.44-0.88,PC结论):我们的综合证据表明,CCFES 可改善中风患者的运动功能。未来还需要更多针对其他脑损伤患者的研究实验来证明CCFES的治疗效果,并为CCFES的统一标准做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Constant torque stretching in ankle contractures results in greater changes in range of motion than constant angle or dynamic stretching: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical and psychosocial consequences of falls in ambulatory individuals with cerebral palsy by age and gross motor function. Reliability of the repetition-to-fatigue method for estimating one-repetition maximum in unilateral strength exercises and its relationship with gait tests in people with multiple sclerosis. The Reha-Toolbox project: Linking item subsets of three established rehabilitation PROMs to nine domains of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Validating a universal measurement scale and standardized, reproducible unit for gross motor development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1