Samuelson's last macroeconomic model: Secular stagnation and endogenous cyclical growth

IF 5 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Structural Change and Economic Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.strueco.2024.02.014
Michaël Assous , Mauro Boianovsky , Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández
{"title":"Samuelson's last macroeconomic model: Secular stagnation and endogenous cyclical growth","authors":"Michaël Assous ,&nbsp;Mauro Boianovsky ,&nbsp;Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.strueco.2024.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On the occasion of the centennial of his mentor Alvin Hansen, Paul Samuelson published in 1988 a modified version of his seminal 1939 multiplier-accelerator model to address aspects of Hansen's secular stagnation hypothesis. The “Keynes-Hansen-Samuelson” model (or KHS, as he called it) was built to analyse the effects of population growth on the economy's trajectory. Several changes were then made. Instead of difference equations and a tight accelerator, as in his 1939 model, Samuelson deployed differential equations and a flexible accelerator to produce a nonlinear limit cycle. Despite Samuelson's strong claims for the analytical contributions of his 1988 paper, it has – in contrast with the 1939 model – received only scant attention by macroeconomists and historians of economics alike. <span>Samuelson's 1988</span> paper was his last published macroeconomic model, based on his long-established tradition of non-optimising macro-dynamics. Our paper provides a close reading of that article and some analytical results that shed new light on the formal aspects of <span>Samuelson's 1988</span> model. We also discuss how it historically links up with business cycle models advanced by John Hicks, Nicholas Kaldor, Roy Harrod and Richard Goodwin and examine how far Samuelson's use of the term secular stagnation differs from Larry Summers's recent reconstruction of it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47829,"journal":{"name":"Structural Change and Economic Dynamics","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 417-426"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X24000365/pdfft?md5=81ab0f0a102a1102e944bd0875803a6e&pid=1-s2.0-S0954349X24000365-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Change and Economic Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X24000365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the occasion of the centennial of his mentor Alvin Hansen, Paul Samuelson published in 1988 a modified version of his seminal 1939 multiplier-accelerator model to address aspects of Hansen's secular stagnation hypothesis. The “Keynes-Hansen-Samuelson” model (or KHS, as he called it) was built to analyse the effects of population growth on the economy's trajectory. Several changes were then made. Instead of difference equations and a tight accelerator, as in his 1939 model, Samuelson deployed differential equations and a flexible accelerator to produce a nonlinear limit cycle. Despite Samuelson's strong claims for the analytical contributions of his 1988 paper, it has – in contrast with the 1939 model – received only scant attention by macroeconomists and historians of economics alike. Samuelson's 1988 paper was his last published macroeconomic model, based on his long-established tradition of non-optimising macro-dynamics. Our paper provides a close reading of that article and some analytical results that shed new light on the formal aspects of Samuelson's 1988 model. We also discuss how it historically links up with business cycle models advanced by John Hicks, Nicholas Kaldor, Roy Harrod and Richard Goodwin and examine how far Samuelson's use of the term secular stagnation differs from Larry Summers's recent reconstruction of it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
萨缪尔森的最后一个宏观经济模型:世俗停滞与内生周期性增长
在恩师阿尔文-汉森百年诞辰之际,保罗-萨缪尔森于 1988 年发表了其 1939 年开创性的乘数-加速器模型的修订版,以解决汉森的世俗停滞假说的某些方面。建立 "凯恩斯-汉森-萨缪尔森 "模型(他称之为 KHS)的目的是分析人口增长对经济轨迹的影响。随后,该模型做出了一些改变。萨缪尔森不再使用 1939 年模型中的差分方程和紧密加速器,而是使用微分方程和灵活加速器来产生非线性极限循环。尽管萨缪尔森对其 1988 年论文在分析方面的贡献大加赞赏,但与 1939 年模型相比,宏观经济学家和经济史学家对其关注甚少。萨缪尔森的 1988 年论文是他发表的最后一篇宏观经济模型,基于他长期以来建立的非优化宏观动力学传统。我们的论文对这篇文章进行了精读,并提供了一些分析结果,对萨缪尔森 1988 年模型的形式方面进行了新的阐释。我们还讨论了该模型与约翰-希克斯、尼古拉斯-卡尔多、罗伊-哈罗德和理查德-古德温提出的商业周期模型之间的历史联系,并研究了萨缪尔森对 "世俗停滞 "一词的使用与拉里-萨默斯最近对该词的重构之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics publishes articles about theoretical, applied and methodological aspects of structural change in economic systems. The journal publishes work analysing dynamics and structural breaks in economic, technological, behavioural and institutional patterns.
期刊最新文献
Cash transfers and the Phillips curve: The case of Brazil during the pandemic European institutional quality and carbon emissions: Convergence club analysis The paradox of debt and Minsky cycle: Nonlinear effects of debt and capital and variety of capitalism What drives the corporate payoffs of using generative artificial intelligence? Transition finance facilitates lower-cost achievement of climate targets: A case study of China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1