Standards and non-tariff barriers in trade – A case study of South Asia

IF 5 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Structural Change and Economic Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.strueco.2024.03.002
Hamid Haroon Ur-Rashid , Muhammad Aamir Khan
{"title":"Standards and non-tariff barriers in trade – A case study of South Asia","authors":"Hamid Haroon Ur-Rashid ,&nbsp;Muhammad Aamir Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.strueco.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area) is not a success story. Geographically connected, but highly dis-integrated, with more than 90 % outward-oriented trade, this is the case of South Asia. Of course, military, and political tensions are the major obstacles. However, recent data and studies show that cumbersome procedures, ruthless application of NTMs (Non-Tariff Measures) and restrictions are the biggest challenges for trade in the region. NTMs are important for public health and the environment but if such standards are mutually recognized through bilateral or multilateral agreements then the hectic and lengthy procedures can be avoided. This is the basic hypothesis investigated and checked in this research. Taking four economies, (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and SriLanka) two-step process is adopted; firstly, AVEs (Ad Valorem Equivalents) of NTMs are calculated and then incorporated in an extended GTAP (Global Trade Analysis Project) based CGE model. Simulation results suggest that if standards are mutually recognized then all countries will be better off, intra-regional trade and welfare will increase. The study recommends that SAFTA should proceed to establish such a mechanism that enables member countries to recognize the certificates and tests approved by the exporting countries. Further, Port restrictions and the issue of para-tariffs should be discussed in future negotiations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47829,"journal":{"name":"Structural Change and Economic Dynamics","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 427-437"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Change and Economic Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X24000389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area) is not a success story. Geographically connected, but highly dis-integrated, with more than 90 % outward-oriented trade, this is the case of South Asia. Of course, military, and political tensions are the major obstacles. However, recent data and studies show that cumbersome procedures, ruthless application of NTMs (Non-Tariff Measures) and restrictions are the biggest challenges for trade in the region. NTMs are important for public health and the environment but if such standards are mutually recognized through bilateral or multilateral agreements then the hectic and lengthy procedures can be avoided. This is the basic hypothesis investigated and checked in this research. Taking four economies, (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and SriLanka) two-step process is adopted; firstly, AVEs (Ad Valorem Equivalents) of NTMs are calculated and then incorporated in an extended GTAP (Global Trade Analysis Project) based CGE model. Simulation results suggest that if standards are mutually recognized then all countries will be better off, intra-regional trade and welfare will increase. The study recommends that SAFTA should proceed to establish such a mechanism that enables member countries to recognize the certificates and tests approved by the exporting countries. Further, Port restrictions and the issue of para-tariffs should be discussed in future negotiations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贸易中的标准和非关税壁垒--南亚案例研究
南亚自由贸易区(SAFTA)并不是一个成功的故事。南亚在地理上相互连接,但一体化程度很低,外向型贸易占 90% 以上,这就是南亚的情况。当然,军事和政治紧张局势是主要障碍。然而,最近的数据和研究表明,繁琐的手续、无情的非关税措施(NTMs)应用和限制是该地区贸易面临的最大挑战。非关税措施对公共卫生和环境非常重要,但如果通过双边或多边协定相互承认这些标准,就可以避免繁琐冗长的程序。这是本研究调查和验证的基本假设。研究以四个经济体(孟加拉国、印度、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡)为对象,分两步进行:首先,计算非关税措施的从价等值(AVEs),然后将其纳入基于全球贸易分析项目(GTAP)的扩展 CGE 模型。模拟结果表明,如果标准得到相互承认,那么所有国家都将受益,区域内贸易和福利都将增加。研究建议,南亚自由贸易区应着手建立这样一种机制,使成员国能够承认出口国批准的证书和测试。此外,在今后的谈判中还应讨论港口限制和准关税问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics publishes articles about theoretical, applied and methodological aspects of structural change in economic systems. The journal publishes work analysing dynamics and structural breaks in economic, technological, behavioural and institutional patterns.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cash transfers and the Phillips curve: The case of Brazil during the pandemic European institutional quality and carbon emissions: Convergence club analysis The paradox of debt and Minsky cycle: Nonlinear effects of debt and capital and variety of capitalism What drives the corporate payoffs of using generative artificial intelligence?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1