Inside out: Addressing the “how” of data collection in experience design research applying introspective methods

Haian Xue, Katelijn van Kooten
{"title":"Inside out: Addressing the “how” of data collection in experience design research applying introspective methods","authors":"Haian Xue,&nbsp;Katelijn van Kooten","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadr.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Introspective (or first-person) methods are carving out their niche in experience design research. Relevant epistemological conversations in recent years have led experience design researchers to appreciate the value of “researcher as subject” in understanding nuanced, rich, felt human experiences mediated by designs. However, there is still a clear need for more detailed guidance on how to employ introspective methods for experience design research. This existing gap in practical application often leads to inconsistent or inconsiderate use, especially among design researchers new to these methods. To address this, this paper explores various ways design researchers can collect introspective data. We conducted a systematic review of 118 articles, each employing or developing introspective methods in some form, published by reputable design research venues from 2012 to 2022. Our analysis offers a comprehensive and organized overview of six categories of introspective data collection techniques and the supportive tools for each. Additionally, we reflect on the current use of introspective methods in experience design research and propose five recommendations for future methodological development. We aspire for this paper to serve as a timely, go-to guide for introspective design researchers, and to promote a more refined and thoughtful application of introspective methods in our field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100031,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Design Research","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 109-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978252400001X/pdfft?md5=1294d641c3280ecf6937358800150c40&pid=1-s2.0-S294978252400001X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978252400001X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introspective (or first-person) methods are carving out their niche in experience design research. Relevant epistemological conversations in recent years have led experience design researchers to appreciate the value of “researcher as subject” in understanding nuanced, rich, felt human experiences mediated by designs. However, there is still a clear need for more detailed guidance on how to employ introspective methods for experience design research. This existing gap in practical application often leads to inconsistent or inconsiderate use, especially among design researchers new to these methods. To address this, this paper explores various ways design researchers can collect introspective data. We conducted a systematic review of 118 articles, each employing or developing introspective methods in some form, published by reputable design research venues from 2012 to 2022. Our analysis offers a comprehensive and organized overview of six categories of introspective data collection techniques and the supportive tools for each. Additionally, we reflect on the current use of introspective methods in experience design research and propose five recommendations for future methodological development. We aspire for this paper to serve as a timely, go-to guide for introspective design researchers, and to promote a more refined and thoughtful application of introspective methods in our field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由内而外:在体验设计研究中运用内省法解决 "如何 "收集数据的问题
内省(或第一人称)方法正在体验设计研究中占据一席之地。近年来,相关的认识论对话促使体验设计研究人员认识到 "研究者作为主体 "在理解以设计为媒介的细微、丰富、可感的人类体验方面的价值。然而,对于如何在体验设计研究中运用内省方法,显然还需要更详细的指导。在实际应用中存在的这一空白往往会导致使用方法的不一致或不周到,尤其是对于刚刚接触这些方法的设计研究人员来说。为了解决这个问题,本文探讨了设计研究人员收集内省数据的各种方法。我们对2012年至2022年期间由著名设计研究机构发表的118篇文章进行了系统回顾,每篇文章都以某种形式运用或发展了内省法。我们的分析全面而有序地概述了六类内省式数据收集技术以及每类技术的辅助工具。此外,我们还对体验设计研究中内省法的当前使用情况进行了反思,并对未来的方法论发展提出了五点建议。我们希望本文能成为内省式设计研究人员的及时指南,并促进内省式方法在我们领域中更精细、更周到的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring opportunities for online pharmacy design for Moroccan citizens Withdrawal notice to: The five-factor model, social network, and social influence in instant messaging groups [Adv. Des. Res. 2 (2024) 14–25] Design interventions for sustainable eating: Case studies across UK and China Design as an agent of narratives: A matrix and framework for incorporating narratives into design processes Effects of color temperature and time gradients on visual fatigue recovery in closed cabin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1