Vulnerabilities in social anxiety: Integrating intra- and interpersonal perspectives

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102415
Rivkah Ginat-Frolich , Eva Gilboa-Schechtman , Jonathan D. Huppert , Idan M. Aderka , Lynn E. Alden , Yair Bar-Haim , Eni S. Becker , Amit Bernstein , Ronny Geva , Richard G. Heimberg , Stefan G. Hofmann , Todd B. Kashdan , Ernst H.W. Koster , Joshua Lipsitz , Jon K. Maner , David A. Moscovitch , Pierre Philippot , Ronald M. Rapee , Karin Roelofs , Thomas L. Rodebaugh , Matthias J. Wieser
{"title":"Vulnerabilities in social anxiety: Integrating intra- and interpersonal perspectives","authors":"Rivkah Ginat-Frolich ,&nbsp;Eva Gilboa-Schechtman ,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Huppert ,&nbsp;Idan M. Aderka ,&nbsp;Lynn E. Alden ,&nbsp;Yair Bar-Haim ,&nbsp;Eni S. Becker ,&nbsp;Amit Bernstein ,&nbsp;Ronny Geva ,&nbsp;Richard G. Heimberg ,&nbsp;Stefan G. Hofmann ,&nbsp;Todd B. Kashdan ,&nbsp;Ernst H.W. Koster ,&nbsp;Joshua Lipsitz ,&nbsp;Jon K. Maner ,&nbsp;David A. Moscovitch ,&nbsp;Pierre Philippot ,&nbsp;Ronald M. Rapee ,&nbsp;Karin Roelofs ,&nbsp;Thomas L. Rodebaugh ,&nbsp;Matthias J. Wieser","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What are the major vulnerabilities in people with social anxiety? What are the most promising directions for translational research pertaining to this condition? The present paper provides an integrative summary of basic and applied translational research on social anxiety, emphasizing vulnerability factors. It is divided into two subsections: intrapersonal and interpersonal. The intrapersonal section synthesizes research relating to (a) self-representations and self-referential processes; (b) emotions and their regulation; and (c) cognitive biases: attention, interpretation and judgment, and memory. The interpersonal section summarizes findings regarding the systems of (a) approach and avoidance, (b) affiliation and social rank, and their implications for interpersonal impairments. Our review suggests that the science of social anxiety and, more generally, psychopathology may be advanced by examining processes and their underlying content within broad psychological systems. Increased interaction between basic and applied researchers to diversify and elaborate different perspectives on social anxiety is necessary for progress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 102415"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000369","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What are the major vulnerabilities in people with social anxiety? What are the most promising directions for translational research pertaining to this condition? The present paper provides an integrative summary of basic and applied translational research on social anxiety, emphasizing vulnerability factors. It is divided into two subsections: intrapersonal and interpersonal. The intrapersonal section synthesizes research relating to (a) self-representations and self-referential processes; (b) emotions and their regulation; and (c) cognitive biases: attention, interpretation and judgment, and memory. The interpersonal section summarizes findings regarding the systems of (a) approach and avoidance, (b) affiliation and social rank, and their implications for interpersonal impairments. Our review suggests that the science of social anxiety and, more generally, psychopathology may be advanced by examining processes and their underlying content within broad psychological systems. Increased interaction between basic and applied researchers to diversify and elaborate different perspectives on social anxiety is necessary for progress.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交焦虑的脆弱性:整合人内和人际视角
社交焦虑症患者的主要弱点是什么?与社交焦虑症相关的转化研究最有前景的方向是什么?本文对社交焦虑的基础研究和应用转化研究进行了综合总结,强调了易感因素。本文分为两个小节:人内和人际。个人内部部分综合了有关以下方面的研究:(a) 自我表征和自我参照过程;(b) 情绪及其调节;(c) 认知偏差:注意力、解释和判断以及记忆。人际关系部分总结了有关以下系统的研究结果:(a) 接近和回避;(b) 从属关系和社会等级;以及它们对人际关系障碍的影响。我们的综述表明,通过在广泛的心理系统中研究社交焦虑的过程及其基本内容,可以推动社交焦虑科学的发展,更广泛地说,可以推动心理病理学的发展。基础研究人员和应用研究人员之间应加强互动,从不同角度对社交焦虑进行多样化研究和阐述,这是取得进展的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board How a strong measurement validity review can go astray: A look at Higgins et al. (2024) and recommendations for future measurement-focused reviews Are digital psychological interventions for psychological distress and quality of life in cancer patients effective? A systematic review and network meta-analysis The impact of interventions for depression on self-perceptions in young people: A systematic review & meta-analysis Corrigendum to “Network meta-analysis examining efficacy of components of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia’ [Clinical Psychology Review 114 (2024) 102507].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1