Reliability of the 2021 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-16 DOI:10.1177/08901171241239735
Sherry Everett Jones, Nancy D Brener, Barbara Queen, Molly Hershey-Arista, William A Harris, Jonetta J Mpofu, J Michael Underwood
{"title":"Reliability of the 2021 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire.","authors":"Sherry Everett Jones, Nancy D Brener, Barbara Queen, Molly Hershey-Arista, William A Harris, Jonetta J Mpofu, J Michael Underwood","doi":"10.1177/08901171241239735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) monitors behaviors, experiences, and conditions affecting the health of high school students nationwide. This study examined the test-retest reliability of the 2021 national YRBS questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Respondents completed a Time 1 and Time 2 paper-and-pencil questionnaire approximately 2 weeks apart during February to May 2022. Data were linked in such a way as to preserve anonymity.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Convenience sample of high schools.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>High school students (N = 588).</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Health risk behaviors and experiences assessed on the 2021 national YRBS questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Time 1 and Time 2 responses were compared for each questionnaire item using the McNemar's test. Then, Cohen's kappa coefficients tested the agreement between Time 1 and Time 2 responses overall, and by sex, grade, and Black, White, and Hispanic race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 74 items analyzed, 96% had at least moderate reliability, and 73% had substantial or almost perfect reliability. The mean Cohen's kappa was .68. McNemar's test findings showed Time 1 and Time 2 data significantly differed (<i>P</i> < .01) for 9 items (12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reliable health behavior measures are important in the development of youth-focused public health programs and policies. Findings suggest the national YRBS questionnaire is a reliable instrument. Such findings lend support to relying on adolescent self-reported data when monitoring health behaviors using the YRBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"843-851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11354317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241239735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) monitors behaviors, experiences, and conditions affecting the health of high school students nationwide. This study examined the test-retest reliability of the 2021 national YRBS questionnaire.

Design: Respondents completed a Time 1 and Time 2 paper-and-pencil questionnaire approximately 2 weeks apart during February to May 2022. Data were linked in such a way as to preserve anonymity.

Setting: Convenience sample of high schools.

Subjects: High school students (N = 588).

Measures: Health risk behaviors and experiences assessed on the 2021 national YRBS questionnaire.

Analysis: Time 1 and Time 2 responses were compared for each questionnaire item using the McNemar's test. Then, Cohen's kappa coefficients tested the agreement between Time 1 and Time 2 responses overall, and by sex, grade, and Black, White, and Hispanic race and ethnicity.

Results: Among the 74 items analyzed, 96% had at least moderate reliability, and 73% had substantial or almost perfect reliability. The mean Cohen's kappa was .68. McNemar's test findings showed Time 1 and Time 2 data significantly differed (P < .01) for 9 items (12%).

Conclusion: Reliable health behavior measures are important in the development of youth-focused public health programs and policies. Findings suggest the national YRBS questionnaire is a reliable instrument. Such findings lend support to relying on adolescent self-reported data when monitoring health behaviors using the YRBS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2021 年全国青少年危险行为调查问卷的可靠性。
目的:青少年危险行为调查(YRBS)监测影响全国高中生健康的行为、经历和状况。本研究考察了 2021 年全国青年风险行为调查问卷的重测可靠性:受访者在 2022 年 2 月至 5 月期间填写了时间 1 和时间 2 纸笔问卷,时间间隔约为两周。数据以匿名方式进行链接:受试者:高中学生(588 人):被试:高中生(N = 588):分析:将时间 1 和时间 2 的回答进行比较:使用 McNemar 检验比较第一时间和第二时间每个问卷项目的回答情况。然后,科恩卡帕系数检验了时间 1 和时间 2 回答的整体一致性,以及按性别、年级、黑人、白人、西班牙裔种族和民族分列的一致性:在分析的 74 个项目中,96% 至少具有中等程度的可靠性,73% 具有相当或几乎完美的可靠性。科恩卡帕平均值为 0.68。McNemar 检验结果显示,时间 1 和时间 2 的数据在 9 个项目(12%)上存在显著差异(P < .01):结论:可靠的健康行为测量对于制定以青少年为重点的公共卫生计划和政策非常重要。研究结果表明,全国青少年健康行为调查问卷是一种可靠的工具。这些研究结果支持在使用 YRBS 监测健康行为时依靠青少年自我报告的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
In Brief. The 'Natural' Accord of DuBois and Washington: An Environmentally Racialized Consciousness. Multi-Family Housing Environment and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Misaligned Supports: Differences in Reported Health Care Worker Well-being Supports Provided and Needed During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Family-Based Approach to Promoting Pediatric Mental Health Recovery in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1