Characteristics of Homeless Temporarily-Housed in Project RoomKey During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Primary Care and Community Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21501319241234869
Kylie Sloan, Alexis Coulourides Kogan, Jodie Guller, Corinne T Feldman, Brett J Feldman
{"title":"Characteristics of Homeless Temporarily-Housed in Project RoomKey During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Kylie Sloan, Alexis Coulourides Kogan, Jodie Guller, Corinne T Feldman, Brett J Feldman","doi":"10.1177/21501319241234869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People experiencing unsheltered homelessness (PEUH) have higher disease burden yet limited access to healthcare. COVID-19 introduced even greater risk for PEUH aged 65+ years with an underlying chronic health condition and were temporarily housed in hotels/motels for Project RoomKey (PRK). This study aimed to characterize a PRK cohort who received primary care from a street medicine program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational case series study included a sample of 35 PRK participants receiving primary care from a street medicine team at a single site from July to September 2020. We used the HOUSED BEDS assessment tool for taking history on PEUH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were 63% male, 40% Hispanic/Latino/a, 40% white, 94% English-speaking, and 73% had chronic health conditions. Assessment revealed: average Homelessness (H) of 4 years; 76% had no prior social service Outreach (O); average Utilization (U) was 4 emergency department visits in prior 6-months; 68% received Salary (S) from government income; Food access or Eat (E) was commonly purchased (29%) or donated (26%); clean water to Drink (D) for 59% of participants; 86% had access to a Bathroom (B); Encampment (E) was varied and 38% reported safety concerns; Daily routine (D) showed 76% could access a telephone, 32% received social support from family; 79% reported past or current Substance use (S). No participants contracted COVID-19 during study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study describes health and demographic characteristics of PRK participants in Southern California. Findings inform policies to continue PRK that includes onsite healthcare such as via street medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10943723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241234869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People experiencing unsheltered homelessness (PEUH) have higher disease burden yet limited access to healthcare. COVID-19 introduced even greater risk for PEUH aged 65+ years with an underlying chronic health condition and were temporarily housed in hotels/motels for Project RoomKey (PRK). This study aimed to characterize a PRK cohort who received primary care from a street medicine program.

Methods: This observational case series study included a sample of 35 PRK participants receiving primary care from a street medicine team at a single site from July to September 2020. We used the HOUSED BEDS assessment tool for taking history on PEUH.

Results: Participants were 63% male, 40% Hispanic/Latino/a, 40% white, 94% English-speaking, and 73% had chronic health conditions. Assessment revealed: average Homelessness (H) of 4 years; 76% had no prior social service Outreach (O); average Utilization (U) was 4 emergency department visits in prior 6-months; 68% received Salary (S) from government income; Food access or Eat (E) was commonly purchased (29%) or donated (26%); clean water to Drink (D) for 59% of participants; 86% had access to a Bathroom (B); Encampment (E) was varied and 38% reported safety concerns; Daily routine (D) showed 76% could access a telephone, 32% received social support from family; 79% reported past or current Substance use (S). No participants contracted COVID-19 during study period.

Conclusions: This study describes health and demographic characteristics of PRK participants in Southern California. Findings inform policies to continue PRK that includes onsite healthcare such as via street medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,RoomKey 项目中临时居住的无家可归者的特征。
导言:无家可归者(PEUH)的疾病负担较重,但获得医疗保健的机会有限。COVID-19 为 65 岁以上、患有潜在慢性疾病、因 "房间钥匙项目"(PRK)而暂时居住在酒店/旅馆的无家可归者带来了更大的风险。本研究旨在描述接受街头医疗项目初级医疗服务的 "PRK "人群的特征:这项观察性病例系列研究包括 35 名 PRK 参与者的样本,他们于 2020 年 7 月至 9 月期间在一个地点接受了街头医疗团队提供的初级医疗服务。我们使用 HOUSED BEDS 评估工具了解 PEUH 病史:结果:63%的参与者为男性,40%为西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔,40%为白人,94%说英语,73%患有慢性疾病。评估显示平均无家可归时间(H)为 4 年;76% 的人以前没有接受过社会服务外联(O);平均使用率(U)为 6 个月内 4 次急诊就诊;68% 的人从政府收入中领取薪水(S);获得或食用的食物(E)通常为购买(29%)或捐赠(26%);59% 的参与者有干净的饮用水 (D);86% 的参与者可以使用浴室 (B);营地 (E) 多种多样,38% 的参与者报告了安全问题;日常生活 (D) 显示 76% 的参与者可以使用电话,32% 的参与者得到了家人的社会支持;79% 的参与者报告了过去或现在的药物使用情况 (S)。在研究期间,没有参与者感染 COVID-19:本研究描述了南加州 PRK 参与者的健康和人口特征。研究结果为继续开展 PRK(包括现场医疗保健,如通过街头医疗)提供了政策依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Predictors of Post-Acute COVID-19 Symptoms in Italian Primary Care Patients. Lessons Learned From a Community-Based Men's Health Fair. A Real-World Precision Medicine Program Including the KidneyIntelX Test Effectively Changes Management Decisions and Outcomes for Patients With Early-Stage Diabetic Kidney Disease. Emergency Department and Dental Clinic Perceptions of Appropriate, and Preventable, Use of the ED for Non-Traumatic Dental Conditions in Hot-Spot Counties: A Mixed Methods Study. Community Activities in Primary Care: A Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1