The Examination and Exploration of Diabetes Distress in Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Mixed-methods Study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Canadian Journal of Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.03.001
{"title":"The Examination and Exploration of Diabetes Distress in Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Mixed-methods Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Diabetes distress (DD) has been understudied in the pregnancy population. Pregnancy is known to be a complex, highly stressful time for women with diabetes because of medical risks and the high burden of diabetes management. Our aim in this study was to explain and understand DD in women with pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An explanatory, sequential mixed-methods study was undertaken. The first strand consisted of a cross-sectional study of 76 women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. A nested sampling approach was used to re-recruit 18 women back into the second strand for qualitative interviews using an interpretive description approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>DD was measured by the validated Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale. A PAID score of ≥40 was positive for distress. DD prevalence was 22.4% in the cross-sectional cohort and the average PAID score was 27.75 (standard deviation 16.08). In the qualitative strand, women with a range of PAID scores (10.0 to 60.0) were sampled for interviews. The majority of these participants described themes of DD in their interviews. Of the 15 women who described DD thematically, only 6 had positive PAID scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Integration of the mixed-methods data underscores important meta-inferences about DD in pregnancy, namely that DD was present to a greater degree than the PAID tool is sensitive to. DD was present qualitatively in most of the qualitative sample, despite interviewing women with a range of PAID scores. Future research on a pregnancy-specific DD scale is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9565,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S149926712400056X/pdfft?md5=9cd83e0adff7dc66cb447f401bafc688&pid=1-s2.0-S149926712400056X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S149926712400056X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Diabetes distress (DD) has been understudied in the pregnancy population. Pregnancy is known to be a complex, highly stressful time for women with diabetes because of medical risks and the high burden of diabetes management. Our aim in this study was to explain and understand DD in women with pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy.

Methods

An explanatory, sequential mixed-methods study was undertaken. The first strand consisted of a cross-sectional study of 76 women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. A nested sampling approach was used to re-recruit 18 women back into the second strand for qualitative interviews using an interpretive description approach.

Results

DD was measured by the validated Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale. A PAID score of ≥40 was positive for distress. DD prevalence was 22.4% in the cross-sectional cohort and the average PAID score was 27.75 (standard deviation 16.08). In the qualitative strand, women with a range of PAID scores (10.0 to 60.0) were sampled for interviews. The majority of these participants described themes of DD in their interviews. Of the 15 women who described DD thematically, only 6 had positive PAID scores.

Conclusions

Integration of the mixed-methods data underscores important meta-inferences about DD in pregnancy, namely that DD was present to a greater degree than the PAID tool is sensitive to. DD was present qualitatively in most of the qualitative sample, despite interviewing women with a range of PAID scores. Future research on a pregnancy-specific DD scale is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠前期糖尿病患者糖尿病困扰的检查和探索:混合方法研究。
背景:对妊娠期妇女的糖尿病困扰研究不足。众所周知,由于医疗风险和糖尿病管理的沉重负担,妊娠对于糖尿病妇女来说是一个复杂、高度紧张的时期:本研究旨在解释和了解妊娠期糖尿病妇女的糖尿病困扰:方法:采用解释性、顺序性混合方法进行研究。第一部分是对 76 名患有 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的妇女进行横断面研究。第二部分采用巢式抽样法,重新招募 18 名妇女进行定性访谈,访谈采用解释性描述法:结果:糖尿病困扰通过有效的 PAID 量表进行测量。PAID 得分为 40 分或更高,表示有积极的困扰。在横断面队列中,糖尿病困扰发生率为 22.4%,PAID 平均分为 27.75 分(标准差为 16.08)。在定性研究中,我们抽取了 PAID 分数在 10.0 - 60.0 之间的妇女进行访谈。其中大多数参与者在访谈中描述了糖尿病困扰的主题。在 15 位描述糖尿病困扰主题的女性中,只有 6 位的 PAID 分数为正:讨论:混合方法数据的整合强调了有关孕期糖尿病困扰的重要元推论,即糖尿病困扰的存在程度高于 PAID 工具的敏感度。尽管对 PAID 分数不等的妇女进行了访谈,但大多数定性样本都存在糖尿病困扰。今后需要对针对孕期的糖尿病困扰量表进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Diabetes
Canadian Journal of Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Diabetes is Canada''s only diabetes-oriented, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal for diabetes health-care professionals. Published bimonthly, the Canadian Journal of Diabetes contains original articles; reviews; case reports; shorter articles such as Perspectives in Practice, Practical Diabetes and Innovations in Diabetes Care; Diabetes Dilemmas and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Masthead Table of Contents Editorial Board Calling All Clinicians: A Brief 5-Step Model for Exploring Diabetes Distress in Routine Diabetes Care Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors vs Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors With Pneumonia, COVID-19, and Other Adverse Respiratory Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1