Influence of different immediate dentin sealing strategies on bond strength of indirect resin nanoceramic restorations

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Oral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1111/eos.12983
Fatma-Alzahraa Mohamed Tahoun, Hany Abdel-Ghafar Kehela, Dina Mohamed Nasr
{"title":"Influence of different immediate dentin sealing strategies on bond strength of indirect resin nanoceramic restorations","authors":"Fatma-Alzahraa Mohamed Tahoun,&nbsp;Hany Abdel-Ghafar Kehela,&nbsp;Dina Mohamed Nasr","doi":"10.1111/eos.12983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we evaluated the effect of four different strategies for bonding a CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic restoration (Lava Ultimate, 3M) to the dentin surface using a universal adhesive (Scotch Bond Universal, 3M) and adhesive resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M) on the shear bond strength (SBS) and failure mode. The strategies comprised: (i) immediate sealing, immediate bonding; (ii) immediate sealing, bonding after 2 weeks with provisional restoration; (iii) immediate sealing with flowable resin composite reinforcement and bonding after 2 weeks with provisional restoration; and (iv) no immediate sealing, and bonding after 2 weeks with provisional restoration. After bonding, all the specimens were thermocycled, shear tests were performed using a universal testing machine, and failure modes were determined using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. The highest mean SBS was recorded with immediate sealing, immediate bonding strategy. Most adhesive failures with exposed dentinal tubules were noted in specimens exposed to bonding after 2 weeks with no immediate sealing, which was associated with the lowest SBS. Mixed failures predominated in all immediate dentin sealing groups. Immediate sealing with universal adhesives improves SBS, particularly in the single-visit approach, which has shown significantly better performance, whereas the provisional phase has a negative effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"132 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.12983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the effect of four different strategies for bonding a CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic restoration (Lava Ultimate, 3M) to the dentin surface using a universal adhesive (Scotch Bond Universal, 3M) and adhesive resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M) on the shear bond strength (SBS) and failure mode. The strategies comprised: (i) immediate sealing, immediate bonding; (ii) immediate sealing, bonding after 2 weeks with provisional restoration; (iii) immediate sealing with flowable resin composite reinforcement and bonding after 2 weeks with provisional restoration; and (iv) no immediate sealing, and bonding after 2 weeks with provisional restoration. After bonding, all the specimens were thermocycled, shear tests were performed using a universal testing machine, and failure modes were determined using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. The highest mean SBS was recorded with immediate sealing, immediate bonding strategy. Most adhesive failures with exposed dentinal tubules were noted in specimens exposed to bonding after 2 weeks with no immediate sealing, which was associated with the lowest SBS. Mixed failures predominated in all immediate dentin sealing groups. Immediate sealing with universal adhesives improves SBS, particularly in the single-visit approach, which has shown significantly better performance, whereas the provisional phase has a negative effect.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同牙本质即刻封闭策略对间接树脂纳米陶瓷修复体粘接强度的影响
在这项研究中,我们评估了使用通用粘合剂(Scotch Bond Universal,3M)和粘合树脂水泥(RelyX Ultimate,3M)将 CAD/CAM 树脂纳米陶瓷修复体(Lava Ultimate,3M)粘结到牙本质表面的四种不同策略对剪切粘结强度(SBS)和失败模式的影响。策略包括:(i) 立即封闭,立即粘接;(ii) 立即封闭,2 周后粘接临时修复体;(iii) 立即封闭,使用可流动树脂复合材料加固,2 周后粘接临时修复体;(iv) 不立即封闭,2 周后粘接临时修复体。粘接后,对所有试样进行热循环,使用万能试验机进行剪切测试,并使用体视显微镜和扫描电子显微镜确定破坏模式。即刻封闭、即刻粘接策略的平均 SBS 值最高。大多数暴露牙本质小管的粘接失败都发生在 2 周后粘接的试样上,没有立即密封,SBS 最低。在所有牙本质即刻封闭组中,混合失败占多数。使用通用粘合剂进行即刻封闭可改善 SBS,特别是在单次就诊方法中,其性能明显更好,而临时阶段则会产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
期刊最新文献
Effects of cross-linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Effect of masticatory muscle function on the craniofacial sutures of the anterior viscerocranium in growing rats. Gender variability in palpation performance for temporomandibular disorders with three different methods: An experimental study. Bond strength of resin-based restorative materials to fast-setting calcium silicate cement using different resin adhesive systems. Different adhesive approaches for the bonding of a new universal resin cement to a disilicate glass-ceramic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1