Waning intra-season vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3N2) underlines the need for more durable protection.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Expert Review of Vaccines Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1080/14760584.2024.2331073
Alexander Domnich, Andrea Orsi, Alessio Signori, Maria Chironna, Ilaria Manini, Christian Napoli, Caterina Rizzo, Donatella Panatto, Giancarlo Icardi
{"title":"Waning intra-season vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3N2) underlines the need for more durable protection.","authors":"Alexander Domnich, Andrea Orsi, Alessio Signori, Maria Chironna, Ilaria Manini, Christian Napoli, Caterina Rizzo, Donatella Panatto, Giancarlo Icardi","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2024.2331073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The question of whether influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) wanes over the winter season is still open and some contradictory findings have been reported. This study investigated the possible decline in protection provided by the available influenza vaccines.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>An individual-level pooled analysis of six test-negative case-control studies conducted in Italy between the 2018/2019 and 2022/2023 seasons was performed. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate weekly change in the odds of testing positive for influenza 14 days after vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6490 patients included, 1633 tested positive for influenza. Each week that had elapsed since vaccination was associated with an increase in the odds of testing positive for any influenza (4.9%; 95% CI: 2.0-8.0%) and for A(H3N2) (6.5%; 95% CI: 2.9-10.3%). This decline in VE was, however, significant only in children and older adults. A similar increase in the odds of testing positive was seen when the dataset was restricted to vaccinees only. Conversely, VE waning was less evident for A(H1N1)pdm09 or B strains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant waning of VE, especially against influenza A(H3N2), may be one of the factors associated with suboptimal end-of-season VE. Next-generation vaccines should provide more durable protection against A(H3N2).</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2024.2331073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The question of whether influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) wanes over the winter season is still open and some contradictory findings have been reported. This study investigated the possible decline in protection provided by the available influenza vaccines.

Research design and methods: An individual-level pooled analysis of six test-negative case-control studies conducted in Italy between the 2018/2019 and 2022/2023 seasons was performed. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate weekly change in the odds of testing positive for influenza 14 days after vaccination.

Results: Of 6490 patients included, 1633 tested positive for influenza. Each week that had elapsed since vaccination was associated with an increase in the odds of testing positive for any influenza (4.9%; 95% CI: 2.0-8.0%) and for A(H3N2) (6.5%; 95% CI: 2.9-10.3%). This decline in VE was, however, significant only in children and older adults. A similar increase in the odds of testing positive was seen when the dataset was restricted to vaccinees only. Conversely, VE waning was less evident for A(H1N1)pdm09 or B strains.

Conclusions: Significant waning of VE, especially against influenza A(H3N2), may be one of the factors associated with suboptimal end-of-season VE. Next-generation vaccines should provide more durable protection against A(H3N2).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲型 H3N2 流感疫苗的季节内效力正在减弱,这凸显了提供更持久保护的必要性。
背景:关于流感疫苗的有效性(VE)是否会随着冬季的到来而减弱的问题仍然没有定论,也有一些相互矛盾的研究结果。本研究调查了现有流感疫苗所提供的保护作用可能下降的情况:对 2018/2019 年至 2022/2023 年季节期间在意大利进行的六项检测阴性病例对照研究进行了个体层面的汇总分析。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以估计接种疫苗 14 天后流感检测呈阳性几率的每周变化:在纳入的6490名患者中,有1633人的流感检测呈阳性。接种疫苗后每过一周,任何流感检测呈阳性的几率(4.9%;95% CI:2.0-8.0%)和甲型(H3N2)流感检测呈阳性的几率(6.5%;95% CI:2.9-10.3%)都会增加。然而,VE 的下降仅对儿童和老年人有显著影响。当数据集仅限于疫苗接种者时,检测结果呈阳性的几率也出现了类似的增长。相反,A(H1N1)pdm09 或 B 株的 VE 下降并不明显:结论:VE(尤其是针对甲型 H3N2 流感的 VE)的显著减弱可能是导致季末 VE 不理想的相关因素之一。下一代疫苗应能为甲型 H3N2 流感提供更持久的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
Expert Review of Vaccines 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Hookworm vaccines: current and future directions. A descriptive review on the real-world impact of Moderna, inc. COVID-19 vaccines. Estimating the time required to reach HPV vaccination targets across Europe. Vaccination strategies for patients under monoclonal antibody and other biological treatments: an updated comprehensive review based on EMA authorizations to January 2024. Comparison of preclinical efficacy of immunotherapies against HPV-induced cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1