Disease-modifying therapy initiation patterns in multiple sclerosis in three large MS populations.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2024-03-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864241233044
Alexander Stahmann, Elaine Craig, David Ellenberger, Firas Fneish, Niklas Frahm, Ruth Ann Marrie, Rod Middleton, Richard Nicholas, Jeff Rodgers, Clemens Warnke, Amber Salter
{"title":"Disease-modifying therapy initiation patterns in multiple sclerosis in three large MS populations.","authors":"Alexander Stahmann, Elaine Craig, David Ellenberger, Firas Fneish, Niklas Frahm, Ruth Ann Marrie, Rod Middleton, Richard Nicholas, Jeff Rodgers, Clemens Warnke, Amber Salter","doi":"10.1177/17562864241233044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment guidelines recommend early disease-modifying therapy (DMT) initiation after diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Multinational comparative studies that assess time to DMT initiation in MS may allow detection of barriers inherent to healthcare systems to explain potential adverse systematic delays in commencing DMTs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate and compare the time to first DMT and its association with sociodemographic and clinical variables after MS diagnosis in three large MS registries.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This observational study was conducted using data from the German MS Registry (GMSR), the North American Research Committee on MS Registry (NARCOMS, US data only), and the United Kingdom MS Registry (UKMSR, both self- and clinician-reported).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from relapsing people with MS (PwMS), with a diagnosis of MS between 2014 and 2019, and available DMT and disability status were pooled using a meta-analytic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5395 PwMS were included in the analysis (GMSR: <i>n</i> = 2658; NARCOMS: <i>n</i> = 447; UKMSR: <i>n</i> = 2290). Kaplan-Meier estimates for the time to first DMT [median months (95% CI)] were 2.0 (1.9-2.0), 3.0 (2-4), and 9.0 (7.7-10.6) for GMSR, NARCOMS, and UKMSR, respectively. Pooled multivariable Cox regression demonstrated shorter time to first DMT for PwMS diagnosed after 2017 [1.65 (1.42-1.92), <i>p</i> < 0.01], and longer time to DMT when a higher-efficacy DMT was selected (0.69 (0.54-0.90), <i>p</i> < 0.0001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Time to DMT initiation differs across the populations studied, indicating that barriers may exist in early access to DMT, particularly in the United Kingdom. However, a consistent decrease in time to DMT initiation was noted since 2017 across all registries. Further studies are warranted comparing the effects of time to DMT and time to higher-efficacy DMT on long-term outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10943712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241233044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatment guidelines recommend early disease-modifying therapy (DMT) initiation after diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Multinational comparative studies that assess time to DMT initiation in MS may allow detection of barriers inherent to healthcare systems to explain potential adverse systematic delays in commencing DMTs.

Objectives: To investigate and compare the time to first DMT and its association with sociodemographic and clinical variables after MS diagnosis in three large MS registries.

Design: This observational study was conducted using data from the German MS Registry (GMSR), the North American Research Committee on MS Registry (NARCOMS, US data only), and the United Kingdom MS Registry (UKMSR, both self- and clinician-reported).

Methods: Data from relapsing people with MS (PwMS), with a diagnosis of MS between 2014 and 2019, and available DMT and disability status were pooled using a meta-analytic approach.

Results: A total of 5395 PwMS were included in the analysis (GMSR: n = 2658; NARCOMS: n = 447; UKMSR: n = 2290). Kaplan-Meier estimates for the time to first DMT [median months (95% CI)] were 2.0 (1.9-2.0), 3.0 (2-4), and 9.0 (7.7-10.6) for GMSR, NARCOMS, and UKMSR, respectively. Pooled multivariable Cox regression demonstrated shorter time to first DMT for PwMS diagnosed after 2017 [1.65 (1.42-1.92), p < 0.01], and longer time to DMT when a higher-efficacy DMT was selected (0.69 (0.54-0.90), p < 0.0001].

Conclusion: Time to DMT initiation differs across the populations studied, indicating that barriers may exist in early access to DMT, particularly in the United Kingdom. However, a consistent decrease in time to DMT initiation was noted since 2017 across all registries. Further studies are warranted comparing the effects of time to DMT and time to higher-efficacy DMT on long-term outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三个大型多发性硬化症群体中多发性硬化症的疾病修饰疗法启动模式。
背景:治疗指南建议在确诊多发性硬化症(MS)后尽早开始使用改变病情疗法(DMT)。对多发性硬化症患者开始接受 DMT 治疗的时间进行评估的多国比较研究可以发现医疗系统固有的障碍,从而解释开始接受 DMT 治疗的潜在不利系统性延误:在三个大型多发性硬化症登记处调查和比较多发性硬化症确诊后首次使用DMT的时间及其与社会人口学和临床变量的关系:这项观察性研究使用了德国多发性硬化症登记处(GMSR)、北美多发性硬化症研究委员会登记处(NARCOMS,仅美国数据)和英国多发性硬化症登记处(UKMSR,包括自我报告和临床医生报告)的数据:采用荟萃分析方法汇总了2014年至2019年期间诊断为多发性硬化症的复发性多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)的数据,以及可用的DMT和残疾状况:共有5395名PwMS纳入分析(GMSR:n = 2658;NARCOMS:n = 447;UKMSR:n = 2290)。GMSR、NARCOMS和UKMSR的首次DMT时间[中位月数(95% CI)]的Kaplan-Meier估计值分别为2.0(1.9-2.0)、3.0(2-4)和9.0(7.7-10.6)。汇总的多变量 Cox 回归显示,2017 年后确诊的 PwMS 首次使用 DMT 的时间更短 [1.65 (1.42-1.92),p p 结论:不同研究人群开始使用 DMT 的时间不同,这表明在早期获得 DMT 方面可能存在障碍,尤其是在英国。不过,自 2017 年以来,所有登记处的 DMT 启动时间都在持续缩短。有必要开展进一步研究,比较开始使用 DMT 的时间和开始使用疗效更高的 DMT 的时间对长期预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality under treatment with GLP-1 RAs or the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in overweight or obese adults without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical and device-based predictors of improved experience of activities of daily living after a multidisciplinary inpatient treatment for people with Parkinson's disease: a cohort study. Maintenance of zilucoplan efficacy in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis up to 24 weeks: a model-informed analysis. Targeting dorsal root ganglia for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: from bench to bedside. CYP2C19 genotype and sodium channel blockers in lacosamide-treated children with epilepsy: two major determinants of trough lacosamide concentration or clinical response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1