Barriers and opportunities for health service access among fathers: A review of empirical evidence.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2024-03-17 DOI:10.1002/hpja.846
Karen Wynter, Kayla A Mansour, Faye Forbes, Jacqui A Macdonald
{"title":"Barriers and opportunities for health service access among fathers: A review of empirical evidence.","authors":"Karen Wynter, Kayla A Mansour, Faye Forbes, Jacqui A Macdonald","doi":"10.1002/hpja.846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Issue addressed: </strong>Engagement with health supports benefits the whole family, yet few health services report successful engagement of fathers. Our aim was to describe available evidence on barriers and opportunities relevant to health system access for fathers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoping reviews were conducted seeking empirical evidence from (1) Australian studies and (2) international literature reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 Australian studies and 44 international reviews were included. The most commonly reported barriers were at the health service level, related to an exclusionary health service focus on mothers. These included both 'surface' factors (e.g., appointment times limited to traditional employment hours) and 'deep' factors, in which health service policies perpetuate traditional gender norms of mothers as 'caregivers' and fathers as 'supporters' or 'providers'. Such barriers were reported consistently, including but not limited to fathers from First Nations or culturally diverse backgrounds, those at risk of poor mental health, experiencing perinatal loss or other adverse pregnancy and birth events, and caring for children with illness, neurodevelopmental or behavioural problems. Opportunities for father engagement include offering father-specific resources and support, facilitating health professionals' confidence and training in working with fathers, and 'gateway consultations', including engaging fathers via appointments for mothers or infants. Ideally, top-down policies should support fathers as infant caregivers in a family-based approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although barriers and opportunities exist at individual and cultural levels, health services hold the key to improved engagement of fathers. SO WHAT?: Evidence-based, innovative strategies, informed by fathers' needs and healthy masculinities, are needed to engage fathers in health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue addressed: Engagement with health supports benefits the whole family, yet few health services report successful engagement of fathers. Our aim was to describe available evidence on barriers and opportunities relevant to health system access for fathers.

Methods: Scoping reviews were conducted seeking empirical evidence from (1) Australian studies and (2) international literature reviews.

Results: A total of 52 Australian studies and 44 international reviews were included. The most commonly reported barriers were at the health service level, related to an exclusionary health service focus on mothers. These included both 'surface' factors (e.g., appointment times limited to traditional employment hours) and 'deep' factors, in which health service policies perpetuate traditional gender norms of mothers as 'caregivers' and fathers as 'supporters' or 'providers'. Such barriers were reported consistently, including but not limited to fathers from First Nations or culturally diverse backgrounds, those at risk of poor mental health, experiencing perinatal loss or other adverse pregnancy and birth events, and caring for children with illness, neurodevelopmental or behavioural problems. Opportunities for father engagement include offering father-specific resources and support, facilitating health professionals' confidence and training in working with fathers, and 'gateway consultations', including engaging fathers via appointments for mothers or infants. Ideally, top-down policies should support fathers as infant caregivers in a family-based approach.

Conclusions: Although barriers and opportunities exist at individual and cultural levels, health services hold the key to improved engagement of fathers. SO WHAT?: Evidence-based, innovative strategies, informed by fathers' needs and healthy masculinities, are needed to engage fathers in health services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父亲获得医疗服务的障碍和机会:经验证据综述。
解决的问题:参与健康支持对整个家庭都有好处,但很少有健康服务机构报告称父亲成功参与了健康支持。我们的目的是描述与父亲使用医疗系统相关的障碍和机遇方面的现有证据:我们进行了范围界定审查,从(1)澳大利亚研究和(2)国际文献审查中寻找经验证据:结果:共纳入了 52 项澳大利亚研究和 44 项国际文献综述。最常报告的障碍发生在医疗服务层面,与医疗服务对母亲的排斥有关。这些障碍既包括 "表面 "因素(如预约时间仅限于传统的工作时间),也包括 "深层 "因素,即医疗服务政策延续了传统的性别规范,即母亲是 "照顾者",父亲是 "支持者 "或 "提供者"。这些障碍不断被报道出来,包括但不限于来自原住民或不同文化背景的父亲、精神健康状况不佳的父亲、经历围产期损失或其他不利怀孕和分娩事件的父亲,以及照顾有疾病、神经发育或行为问题的孩子的父亲。父亲参与的机会包括提供针对父亲的资源和支持,促进医疗专业人员与父亲合作的信心和培训,以及 "关口咨询",包括通过母亲或婴儿的预约让父亲参与。理想情况下,自上而下的政策应支持父亲以家庭为基础照顾婴儿:尽管在个人和文化层面存在障碍和机遇,但医疗服务是提高父亲参与度的关键。所以呢:需要以父亲的需求和健康的男子气概为基础,采取基于证据的创新策略,让父亲参与到医疗服务中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
期刊最新文献
How can community music shape individual and collective well‐being? A case study of a place‐based initiative Development and testing of the capacity of organisations for system practices scale 'Our culture makes us strong': Understanding and working with community strengths among Aboriginal people in western Sydney. Pharmacist E-script transcription service initiated nicotine replacement therapy uptake in pre-admission clinic: A pilot study. Exploration of barriers and enablers to diabetes care for Aboriginal people on rural Ngarrindjeri Country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1