Comparing parent-child interaction during wordless book reading, print book reading and imaginative play.

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Child Language Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1017/S0305000924000072
Sandra J Mathers, Alex Hodgkiss, Pinar Kolancali, Sophie A Booton, Zhaoyu Wang, Victoria A Murphy
{"title":"Comparing parent-child interaction during wordless book reading, print book reading and imaginative play.","authors":"Sandra J Mathers, Alex Hodgkiss, Pinar Kolancali, Sophie A Booton, Zhaoyu Wang, Victoria A Murphy","doi":"10.1017/S0305000924000072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated differences in adult-child language interactions when parents and their three-to-four-year old children engage in wordless book reading, text-and-picture book reading and a small-world toy play activity. Twenty-two parents recorded themselves completing each activity at home with their child. Parent input was compared across contexts, focusing on interactive and conceptual domains: use of open prompts, expansions or extensions of children's utterances, and use of decontextualised (abstract) language. Use of linguistic expansions was greater during book reading than toy play. Parents used open questions and added contingent conceptual information more often when reading wordless books than in both other conditions. Findings suggest that wordless books may combine the benefits of open-endedness and linguistic content based around a narrative. Parents' use of abstract language also varied by condition. This study extends understanding of the role of activity context in shaping children's language learning environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Language","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000924000072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated differences in adult-child language interactions when parents and their three-to-four-year old children engage in wordless book reading, text-and-picture book reading and a small-world toy play activity. Twenty-two parents recorded themselves completing each activity at home with their child. Parent input was compared across contexts, focusing on interactive and conceptual domains: use of open prompts, expansions or extensions of children's utterances, and use of decontextualised (abstract) language. Use of linguistic expansions was greater during book reading than toy play. Parents used open questions and added contingent conceptual information more often when reading wordless books than in both other conditions. Findings suggest that wordless books may combine the benefits of open-endedness and linguistic content based around a narrative. Parents' use of abstract language also varied by condition. This study extends understanding of the role of activity context in shaping children's language learning environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较无字书阅读、印刷书阅读和想象力游戏中的亲子互动。
本研究调查了父母与三到四岁的孩子进行无字图书阅读、文字加图片图书阅读和小世界玩具游戏活动时,成人与孩子之间语言互动的差异。22 位家长记录了自己在家与孩子一起完成每项活动的过程。我们对家长在不同情境下的投入进行了比较,重点关注互动和概念领域:使用开放式提示、扩展或延伸儿童的话语,以及使用非情境化(抽象)语言。与玩玩具相比,儿童在阅读图书时更多地使用语言扩展。与其他两种情况相比,家长在阅读无字书时更多地使用开放式问题和添加或然概念信息。研究结果表明,无字书可将开放性和以叙事为基础的语言内容的优点结合起来。家长使用抽象语言的情况也因条件而异。这项研究拓展了人们对活动情境在塑造儿童语言学习环境中的作用的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A key publication in the field, Journal of Child Language publishes articles on all aspects of the scientific study of language behaviour in children, the principles which underlie it, and the theories which may account for it. The international range of authors and breadth of coverage allow the journal to forge links between many different areas of research including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science and anthropology. This interdisciplinary approach spans a wide range of interests: phonology, phonetics, morphology, syntax, vocabulary, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, or any other recognised facet of language study.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive skills differentially influence narrative macrostructure in bilinguals’ L1 and L2 Vocabulary trajectories in German-speaking children from 18 months to three years: a growth mixture model Interest, home environment, and young Chinese children's development of English as a second/foreign language. Maternal underestimations and overestimations of their infants’ word comprehension: effects on mothers’ verbal input and infants’ receptive vocabulary Navajo Verbs in Child Speech
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1