How sustainable is resilience? A mixed-methods study on the COVID-19-pandemic as a challenge to resilience resources of older adults who previously recovered from depression.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging & Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1080/13607863.2024.2326890
Silvia S Klokgieters, Michael Ungar, Brenda W J H Penninx, Lieneke Glas, Didi Rhebergen, Almar A L Kok
{"title":"How sustainable is resilience? A mixed-methods study on the COVID-19-pandemic as a challenge to resilience resources of older adults who previously recovered from depression.","authors":"Silvia S Klokgieters, Michael Ungar, Brenda W J H Penninx, Lieneke Glas, Didi Rhebergen, Almar A L Kok","doi":"10.1080/13607863.2024.2326890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite expanding knowledge about the internal and external resources that contribute to resilience among individuals who have experienced depression, the long-term accessibility and protectiveness of these resources across different stressors is unknown. We investigated whether and how the resilience resources of individuals who previously recovered from late-life depression remained protective during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a sequential explanatory mixed methods design. Quantitative data were derived from two psychiatric case-control cohorts and included twelve repeated measures during the COVID-19 pandemic (<i>n</i> = 465, aged ≥ 60). Qualitative data included two sequential interviews held in 2020 (<i>n</i> = 25) and 2021 (<i>n</i> = 19). We used thematic analysis to determine the protective resources after depression and during the COVID-19 pandemic and linear mixed models to examine the effect of these resources on change in depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While resources of 'Taking agency', 'Need for rest', 'Managing thought processes' and 'Learning from depression' remained accessible and protective during the pandemic, 'Social support' and 'Engaging in activities' did not. 'Negotiating with lockdown measures', 'changing social contact' and 'changing activities' were compensating strategies. Quantitative data confirmed the protectiveness of social contact, social cohesion, sense of mastery, physical activity, staying active and entertained and not following the media.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many of the resources that previously helped to recover from depression also helped to maintain good mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Where accessibility and protectiveness declined, compensatory strategies or new resources were used. Hence, the sustainability of resilience is enabled through adaptation and compensation processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55546,"journal":{"name":"Aging & Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging & Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2326890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite expanding knowledge about the internal and external resources that contribute to resilience among individuals who have experienced depression, the long-term accessibility and protectiveness of these resources across different stressors is unknown. We investigated whether and how the resilience resources of individuals who previously recovered from late-life depression remained protective during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We used a sequential explanatory mixed methods design. Quantitative data were derived from two psychiatric case-control cohorts and included twelve repeated measures during the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 465, aged ≥ 60). Qualitative data included two sequential interviews held in 2020 (n = 25) and 2021 (n = 19). We used thematic analysis to determine the protective resources after depression and during the COVID-19 pandemic and linear mixed models to examine the effect of these resources on change in depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: While resources of 'Taking agency', 'Need for rest', 'Managing thought processes' and 'Learning from depression' remained accessible and protective during the pandemic, 'Social support' and 'Engaging in activities' did not. 'Negotiating with lockdown measures', 'changing social contact' and 'changing activities' were compensating strategies. Quantitative data confirmed the protectiveness of social contact, social cohesion, sense of mastery, physical activity, staying active and entertained and not following the media.

Conclusion: Many of the resources that previously helped to recover from depression also helped to maintain good mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Where accessibility and protectiveness declined, compensatory strategies or new resources were used. Hence, the sustainability of resilience is enabled through adaptation and compensation processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复原力的可持续性如何?一项关于 COVID-19 大流行对曾从抑郁症中康复的老年人复原力资源的挑战的混合方法研究。
目的:尽管人们对促进抑郁症患者复原力的内部和外部资源有了更多的了解,但这些资源在不同压力下的长期可获得性和保护性尚不清楚。我们研究了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,曾从晚年抑郁症中恢复的个体的复原力资源是否以及如何保持其保护性:我们采用了顺序解释混合方法设计。定量数据来自两个精神病病例对照队列,包括 COVID-19 大流行期间的 12 项重复测量(n = 465,年龄≥ 60)。定性数据包括在 2020 年(n = 25)和 2021 年(n = 19)进行的两次连续访谈。我们使用主题分析来确定抑郁后和COVID-19大流行期间的保护性资源,并使用线性混合模型来研究这些资源对COVID-19大流行期间抑郁症状变化的影响:结果:在大流行期间,"发挥主观能动性"、"需要休息"、"管理思维过程 "和 "从抑郁中学习 "等资源仍然具有可获得性和保护性,而 "社会支持 "和 "参与活动 "则不具有可获得性和保护性。与封锁措施协商"、"改变社会接触 "和 "改变活动 "是补偿性策略。定量数据证实了社会接触、社会凝聚力、主人翁意识、体育活动、保持活跃和娱乐以及不追随媒体的保护作用:结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,许多以前有助于从抑郁症中恢复过来的资源也有助于保持良好的心理健康。在可获得性和保护性下降的地方,人们使用了补偿策略或新的资源。因此,通过适应和补偿过程,复原力得以持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aging & Mental Health
Aging & Mental Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Aging & Mental Health provides a leading international forum for the rapidly expanding field which investigates the relationship between the aging process and mental health. The journal addresses the mental changes associated with normal and abnormal or pathological aging, as well as the psychological and psychiatric problems of the aging population. The journal also has a strong commitment to interdisciplinary and innovative approaches that explore new topics and methods. Aging & Mental Health covers the biological, psychological and social aspects of aging as they relate to mental health. In particular it encourages an integrated approach for examining various biopsychosocial processes and etiological factors associated with psychological changes in the elderly. It also emphasizes the various strategies, therapies and services which may be directed at improving the mental health of the elderly and their families. In this way the journal promotes a strong alliance among the theoretical, experimental and applied sciences across a range of issues affecting mental health and aging. The emphasis of the journal is on rigorous quantitative, and qualitative, research and, high quality innovative studies on emerging topics.
期刊最新文献
"I think we just saw happier residents": nursing home provider reported readiness assessment of the individualized positive psychosocial interaction (IPPI) program. ‘Mental health is a mystery’: patient perspectives on treatment engagement in the referral process to specialty geriatric mental health services Successful aging and its relationship with mindfulness, self-compassion factors, and subjective well-being in older adults Feasibility of training family caregivers of people living with dementia online to deliver life review depression intervention at home. In the presence of death and dying: death attitudes and compassion fatigue among certified nursing assistants in skilled care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1