Mitigation of N2O emissions in water-saving paddy fields: Evaluating organic fertilizer substitution and microbial mechanisms

IF 4.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Integrative Agriculture Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.047
Delei Kong, Xianduo Zhang, Qidong Yu, Yaguo Jin, Peikun Jiang, Shuang Wu, Shuwei Liu, Jianwen Zou
{"title":"Mitigation of N2O emissions in water-saving paddy fields: Evaluating organic fertilizer substitution and microbial mechanisms","authors":"Delei Kong, Xianduo Zhang, Qidong Yu, Yaguo Jin, Peikun Jiang, Shuang Wu, Shuwei Liu, Jianwen Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water-saving irrigation strategies can successfully alleviate methane emissions from rice fields, but significantly stimulate nitrous oxide (NO) emissions because of variations in soil oxygen level and redox potential. However, the relationship linking soil NO emissions to nitrogen (N) functional genes during various fertilization treatments in water-saving paddy fields has rarely been investigated. Furthermore, the mitigation potential of organic fertilizer substitution on NO emissions and the microbial mechanism in rice fields must be further elucidated. Our study examined how soil NO emissions were affected by related functional microorganisms [ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA), ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), and ] to various fertilization treatments in a rice field in southeast China over two years. In this study, three fertilization regimes were applied to rice cultivation: a no nitrogen (N) (Control), an inorganic N (N), and an inorganic N with partial N substitution with organic manure (N+N). Over two rice-growing seasons, cumulative NO emissions averaged 0.47, 4.62 and 4.08 kg ha for the Control, N and N+N treatments, respectively. In comparison to the N treatment, the N+N fertilization regime considerably reduced soil NO emissions by 11.6% while maintaining rice yield, with a lower NO emission factor from fertilizer N (EF) of 0.95%. Nitrogen fertilization considerably raised the AOB, and gene abundances, in comparison to the Control treatment. Moreover, the substitution of organic manure for inorganic N fertilizer significantly decreased AOB and gene abundances and increased gene abundance. The AOB responded to N fertilization more sensitively than the AOA. Total NO emissions significantly correlated positively with AOB and gene abundances while having a negative correlation with gene abundance and the / ratio across N-fertilized plots. In summary, we conclude that organic manure substitution for inorganic N fertilizer decreased soil NO emissions primarily by changing the soil NO-N, pH and DOC levels, thus inhibiting the activities of ammonia oxidation in nitrification and nitrite reduction in denitrification, and strengthening NO reduction in denitrification from water-saving rice paddies.","PeriodicalId":16305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water-saving irrigation strategies can successfully alleviate methane emissions from rice fields, but significantly stimulate nitrous oxide (NO) emissions because of variations in soil oxygen level and redox potential. However, the relationship linking soil NO emissions to nitrogen (N) functional genes during various fertilization treatments in water-saving paddy fields has rarely been investigated. Furthermore, the mitigation potential of organic fertilizer substitution on NO emissions and the microbial mechanism in rice fields must be further elucidated. Our study examined how soil NO emissions were affected by related functional microorganisms [ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA), ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), and ] to various fertilization treatments in a rice field in southeast China over two years. In this study, three fertilization regimes were applied to rice cultivation: a no nitrogen (N) (Control), an inorganic N (N), and an inorganic N with partial N substitution with organic manure (N+N). Over two rice-growing seasons, cumulative NO emissions averaged 0.47, 4.62 and 4.08 kg ha for the Control, N and N+N treatments, respectively. In comparison to the N treatment, the N+N fertilization regime considerably reduced soil NO emissions by 11.6% while maintaining rice yield, with a lower NO emission factor from fertilizer N (EF) of 0.95%. Nitrogen fertilization considerably raised the AOB, and gene abundances, in comparison to the Control treatment. Moreover, the substitution of organic manure for inorganic N fertilizer significantly decreased AOB and gene abundances and increased gene abundance. The AOB responded to N fertilization more sensitively than the AOA. Total NO emissions significantly correlated positively with AOB and gene abundances while having a negative correlation with gene abundance and the / ratio across N-fertilized plots. In summary, we conclude that organic manure substitution for inorganic N fertilizer decreased soil NO emissions primarily by changing the soil NO-N, pH and DOC levels, thus inhibiting the activities of ammonia oxidation in nitrification and nitrite reduction in denitrification, and strengthening NO reduction in denitrification from water-saving rice paddies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少节水型稻田的一氧化二氮排放:评估有机肥替代和微生物机制
节水灌溉策略可成功缓解稻田甲烷排放,但由于土壤含氧量和氧化还原电位的变化,会显著刺激一氧化二氮(NO)的排放。然而,在节水型稻田的各种施肥处理过程中,土壤氧化亚氮排放与氮(N)功能基因之间的关系却鲜有研究。此外,还必须进一步阐明有机肥替代对水稻田氮氧化物排放的缓解潜力及其微生物机制。我们的研究考察了在中国东南部的一块稻田中,相关功能微生物[氨氧化古细菌(AOA)、氨氧化细菌(AOB)和]对各种施肥处理的影响。在这项研究中,水稻种植采用了三种施肥方案:无氮(对照)、无机氮(氮)和无机氮加部分有机肥替代氮(氮+氮)。在两个水稻种植季节中,对照组、氮处理和氮+氮处理的氮氧化物累积排放量平均分别为 0.47、4.62 和 4.08 千克/公顷。与氮肥处理相比,氮+氮施肥方案在保持水稻产量的同时,大大减少了 11.6% 的土壤氮氧化物排放量,氮肥的氮氧化物排放系数(EF)更低,为 0.95%。与对照处理相比,氮肥大大提高了 AOB 和基因丰度。此外,用有机肥替代无机氮肥可显著降低 AOB 和基因丰度,提高基因丰度。AOB 对氮肥的反应比 AOA 更敏感。氮氧化物排放总量与 AOB 和基因丰度呈明显的正相关,而与基因丰度和各氮肥地块的 / 比率呈负相关。综上所述,我们得出结论:有机肥替代无机氮肥主要是通过改变土壤中的 NO-N、pH 值和 DOC 水平,从而抑制硝化过程中的氨氧化活动和反硝化过程中的亚硝酸盐还原活动,加强节水型稻田反硝化过程中的 NO 还原活动,从而减少土壤中的 NO 排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Journal of Integrative Agriculture AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
4817
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Integrative Agriculture publishes manuscripts in the categories of Commentary, Review, Research Article, Letter and Short Communication, focusing on the core subjects: Crop Genetics & Breeding, Germplasm Resources, Physiology, Biochemistry, Cultivation, Tillage, Plant Protection, Animal Science, Veterinary Science, Soil and Fertilization, Irrigation, Plant Nutrition, Agro-Environment & Ecology, Bio-material and Bio-energy, Food Science, Agricultural Economics and Management, Agricultural Information Science.
期刊最新文献
Rural labor migration and farmers’ arrangements of rice production systems in Central China: Insight from the intergenerational division of labor Involvement of the cytochrome P450 genes CYP6DW3 and CYP4C64 in afidopyropen resistance in Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean (Q Biotype) Land use shapes the microbial community structure by altering soil aggregates and dissolved organic matter components Rabies virus-based oral and inactivated vaccines protect minks against SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission1 The desertification process alters soil microbial metabolic limitations and their effects on soil carbon sequestration in a Tibetan alpine steppe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1