The Fed takes on corporate credit risk: An analysis of the efficacy of the SMCCF

IF 4.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Monetary Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2024.103573
{"title":"The Fed takes on corporate credit risk: An analysis of the efficacy of the SMCCF","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoneco.2024.103573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper evaluates the efficacy of the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility, a program designed to stabilize the U.S.<span> corporate bond market during the COVID-19 pandemic. The program announcements on March 23 and April 9, 2020, significantly reduced investment-grade credit spreads across the maturity spectrum – irrespective of the program’s maturity-eligibility criterion – and ultimately restored the normal upward-sloping term structure of credit spreads. The Federal Reserve’s actual purchases reduced credit spreads of eligible bonds 3 basis points more than those of ineligible bonds, a sizable effect given the modest volume of purchases. A calibrated variant of the preferred habit model shows that a “dash for cash” – a selloff of shorter-term lowest-risk investment-grade bonds – combined with a spike in the arbitrageurs’ risk aversion, can account for the inversion of the investment-grade credit curve during the height of turmoil in the market. Consistent with the empirical findings, the Fed’s announcements, by reducing risk aversion and alleviating market segmentation, helped restore the upward-sloping credit curve in the investment-grade segment of the market.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monetary Economics","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 103573"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Monetary Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304393224000266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper evaluates the efficacy of the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility, a program designed to stabilize the U.S. corporate bond market during the COVID-19 pandemic. The program announcements on March 23 and April 9, 2020, significantly reduced investment-grade credit spreads across the maturity spectrum – irrespective of the program’s maturity-eligibility criterion – and ultimately restored the normal upward-sloping term structure of credit spreads. The Federal Reserve’s actual purchases reduced credit spreads of eligible bonds 3 basis points more than those of ineligible bonds, a sizable effect given the modest volume of purchases. A calibrated variant of the preferred habit model shows that a “dash for cash” – a selloff of shorter-term lowest-risk investment-grade bonds – combined with a spike in the arbitrageurs’ risk aversion, can account for the inversion of the investment-grade credit curve during the height of turmoil in the market. Consistent with the empirical findings, the Fed’s announcements, by reducing risk aversion and alleviating market segmentation, helped restore the upward-sloping credit curve in the investment-grade segment of the market.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美联储承担企业信贷风险:对 SMCCF 效力的分析
本文评估了二级市场公司信贷机制的有效性,该机制是在 COVID-19 大流行期间为稳定美国公司债券市场而设计的一项计划。该计划于 2020 年 3 月 23 日和 4 月 9 日宣布,大大降低了各期限投资级信用利差--无论该计划的期限资格标准如何--并最终恢复了信用利差的正常向上倾斜期限结构。美联储的实际购买行为使合格债券的信用利差比不合格债券的信用利差高出 3 个基点,考虑到购买量不大,这是一个相当大的影响。偏好习惯模型的一个校准变体显示,"冲向现金"--短期最低风险投资级债券的抛售--加上套利者风险规避情绪的飙升,可以解释市场动荡高峰期投资级信贷曲线倒挂的原因。与实证研究结果一致的是,美联储的公告通过降低风险规避和缓解市场分割,帮助恢复了投资级市场部分向上倾斜的信贷曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
90
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The profession has witnessed over the past twenty years a remarkable expansion of research activities bearing on problems in the broader field of monetary economics. The strong interest in monetary analysis has been increasingly matched in recent years by the growing attention to the working and structure of financial institutions. The role of various institutional arrangements, the consequences of specific changes in banking structure and the welfare aspects of structural policies have attracted an increasing interest in the profession. There has also been a growing attention to the operation of credit markets and to various aspects in the behavior of rates of return on assets. The Journal of Monetary Economics provides a specialized forum for the publication of this research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board A theory of the dynamics of factor shares Learning about labor markets Contagion in debt and collateral markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1