Enhancing urad bean (Vigna mungo L.) crop management with machine learning: Predictive analysis of pod rot severity and pod bug incidence patterns

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES Australasian Plant Pathology Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI:10.1007/s13313-024-00967-7
{"title":"Enhancing urad bean (Vigna mungo L.) crop management with machine learning: Predictive analysis of pod rot severity and pod bug incidence patterns","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s13313-024-00967-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Urad bean (<em>Vigna mungo</em> L.), commonly known as black gram, is an important pulse crop in Indian agriculture. However, the crop confronts significant challenges due to diseases, including pod rot caused by <em>Fusarium</em> sp, and pest attacks by the pod bug (<em>Clavigralla gibbosa</em>). Accurate prediction of disease severity and pest incidence is essential for formulating effective management strategies to ensure sustainable crop production. A comprehensive field experiment was conducted at the Crop Research Center, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, during the rainy seasons of 2021 and 2022. The primary objective was to analyze the behavioral patterns of disease severity and pod bug infestations in urad bean. Data on pod rot disease severity and pest incidence were meticulously recorded on a weekly basis. Four Machine Learning approaches, namely ANN, Lasso, Ridge, and Random Forest, were trained and tested to understand the influence of meteorological parameters on pod rot and pest severity. The Random Forest model exhibited superior generalization performance in predicting both disease severity and pest incidence, closely followed by Ridge regression and Lasso regression. The ANN model showed slightly higher testing error metrics. Notably, the Random Forest model demonstrated effective control overfitting, yielding maximum R-squared values of 0.70 and 0.82 for pod rot and pest incidence, respectively. The study’s findings offer valuable insights for agricultural stakeholders in selecting appropriate prediction models to optimize crop management practices and promote sustainable agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":8598,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Plant Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-024-00967-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urad bean (Vigna mungo L.), commonly known as black gram, is an important pulse crop in Indian agriculture. However, the crop confronts significant challenges due to diseases, including pod rot caused by Fusarium sp, and pest attacks by the pod bug (Clavigralla gibbosa). Accurate prediction of disease severity and pest incidence is essential for formulating effective management strategies to ensure sustainable crop production. A comprehensive field experiment was conducted at the Crop Research Center, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, during the rainy seasons of 2021 and 2022. The primary objective was to analyze the behavioral patterns of disease severity and pod bug infestations in urad bean. Data on pod rot disease severity and pest incidence were meticulously recorded on a weekly basis. Four Machine Learning approaches, namely ANN, Lasso, Ridge, and Random Forest, were trained and tested to understand the influence of meteorological parameters on pod rot and pest severity. The Random Forest model exhibited superior generalization performance in predicting both disease severity and pest incidence, closely followed by Ridge regression and Lasso regression. The ANN model showed slightly higher testing error metrics. Notably, the Random Forest model demonstrated effective control overfitting, yielding maximum R-squared values of 0.70 and 0.82 for pod rot and pest incidence, respectively. The study’s findings offer valuable insights for agricultural stakeholders in selecting appropriate prediction models to optimize crop management practices and promote sustainable agriculture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习加强蚕豆(Vigna mungo L.)作物管理:豆荚腐烂严重程度和豆荚虫发生模式的预测分析
摘要 乌拉豆(Vigna mungo L.),俗称黑糯米,是印度农业中重要的豆类作物。然而,该作物面临着巨大的病害挑战,包括由镰刀菌引起的豆荚腐烂病和由豆荚虫(Clavigralla gibbosa)引起的虫害。准确预测病害严重程度和虫害发生率对于制定有效的管理策略以确保作物的可持续生产至关重要。2021 年和 2022 年雨季期间,在北阿坎德邦潘特纳加的作物研究中心进行了一项综合田间试验。主要目的是分析乌豆病害严重程度和豆荚虫侵扰的行为模式。荚腐病严重程度和虫害发生率的数据每周都有详细记录。对四种机器学习方法(即 ANN、Lasso、Ridge 和随机森林)进行了训练和测试,以了解气象参数对豆荚腐烂病和虫害严重程度的影响。随机森林模型在预测病害严重程度和虫害发生率方面表现出卓越的泛化性能,岭回归和拉索回归紧随其后。ANN 模型的测试误差指标略高。值得注意的是,随机森林模型有效地控制了过度拟合,对豆荚腐烂病和虫害发生率的最大 R 平方值分别为 0.70 和 0.82。研究结果为农业利益相关者提供了宝贵的见解,帮助他们选择适当的预测模型,优化作物管理方法,促进农业可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Plant Pathology
Australasian Plant Pathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Australasian Plant Pathology presents new and significant research in all facets of the field of plant pathology. Dedicated to a worldwide readership, the journal focuses on research in the Australasian region, including Australia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea, as well as the Indian, Pacific regions. Australasian Plant Pathology is the official journal of the Australasian Plant Pathology Society.
期刊最新文献
Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with branch dieback and decline of macadamia trees in South Africa Development of ISSR-Derived SCAR marker for detection of Fusarium oxysporum responsible for corm rot of saffron Detection and characterization of the cowpea chlorotic mottle virus in forage peanut (Arachis pintoi) in Brazil The genomes of two Australian isolates of Verticillium dahliae recovered from cotton fields Development of a qPCR assay to detect Diplodia seriata on chipped apple wood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1