{"title":"Does Academic Freedom Protect Pedagogical Autonomy?","authors":"Scott Gelber","doi":"10.1353/rhe.0.a922661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholars have analyzed debates about controversial faculty speech inside and outside of the classroom, but none have paid close attention to the facet of academic freedom related to professors’ decisions about daily teaching methods. This omission, along with obstacles to enacting pedagogical norms, has caused the scholarly community to overlook the manner in which academic freedom entails collective supervision of teaching. By viewing instructional choices through the prism of academic freedom, this essay encourages faculty members to engage with the scholarship of teaching in a manner that is similar to how we consult disciplinary literature when conducting research or determining course content.</p>","PeriodicalId":47732,"journal":{"name":"Review of Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.a922661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scholars have analyzed debates about controversial faculty speech inside and outside of the classroom, but none have paid close attention to the facet of academic freedom related to professors’ decisions about daily teaching methods. This omission, along with obstacles to enacting pedagogical norms, has caused the scholarly community to overlook the manner in which academic freedom entails collective supervision of teaching. By viewing instructional choices through the prism of academic freedom, this essay encourages faculty members to engage with the scholarship of teaching in a manner that is similar to how we consult disciplinary literature when conducting research or determining course content.
期刊介绍：
The official journal of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), The Review of Higher Education provides a forum for discussion of issues affecting higher education. The journal advances the study of college and university issues by publishing peer-reviewed articles, essays, reviews, and research findings. Its broad approach emphasizes systematic inquiry and practical implications. Considered one of the leading research journals in the field, The Review keeps scholars, academic leaders, and public policymakers abreast of critical issues facing higher education today.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
