Improving the utility of surrogates intended for foodborne pathogen preventive control validations

IF 8.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Current Opinion in Food Science Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101153
Ian M Hildebrandt, Bradley P Marks
{"title":"Improving the utility of surrogates intended for foodborne pathogen preventive control validations","authors":"Ian M Hildebrandt,&nbsp;Bradley P Marks","doi":"10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act, surrogate microorganisms have become increasingly important tools in the modern U.S. food system. Food processors may implement surrogate-based validations of preventive controls, but they often rely on independent research to quantify the surrogate–pathogen relationship. A systematic review of 59 2018–2023 surrogate–pathogen comparison studies revealed common pitfalls, such as inconsistent determination of the appropriate relative resistance of the surrogate and the pathogen to a reduction treatment. While surrogate research is diversifying with novel applications, the utility of recent research is limited, as studies lack robust statistical characterization of the surrogate–pathogen relationship needed for fully informed application in industry validations. Standard surrogate characterization and implementation practices would improve utility and food control validation success.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54291,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799324000316/pdfft?md5=f009a1cf5ce22951e5a78e73e7391a45&pid=1-s2.0-S2214799324000316-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214799324000316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act, surrogate microorganisms have become increasingly important tools in the modern U.S. food system. Food processors may implement surrogate-based validations of preventive controls, but they often rely on independent research to quantify the surrogate–pathogen relationship. A systematic review of 59 2018–2023 surrogate–pathogen comparison studies revealed common pitfalls, such as inconsistent determination of the appropriate relative resistance of the surrogate and the pathogen to a reduction treatment. While surrogate research is diversifying with novel applications, the utility of recent research is limited, as studies lack robust statistical characterization of the surrogate–pathogen relationship needed for fully informed application in industry validations. Standard surrogate characterization and implementation practices would improve utility and food control validation success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高用于食源性病原体预防控制验证的替代品的效用
自《食品安全现代化法案》实施以来,代用微生物已成为美国现代食品系统中日益重要的工具。食品加工商可能会实施基于替代物的预防性控制验证,但他们通常依赖于独立的研究来量化替代物与病原体的关系。对 59 项 2018-2023 年代用品-病原体对比研究进行的系统性审查发现了一些常见的缺陷,例如在确定代用品和病原体对减量处理的适当相对抗性方面不一致。虽然代用物研究正随着新应用而多样化,但近期研究的效用有限,因为研究缺乏对代用物与病原体关系的强大统计特征描述,而这是在行业验证中进行充分知情应用所必需的。标准的替代物特征描述和实施方法将提高效用和食品控制验证的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Food Science
Current Opinion in Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Food Science specifically provides expert views on current advances in food science in a clear and readable format. It also evaluates the most noteworthy papers from original publications, annotated by experts. Key Features: Expert Views on Current Advances: Clear and readable insights from experts in the field regarding current advances in food science. Evaluation of Noteworthy Papers: Annotated evaluations of the most interesting papers from the extensive array of original publications. Themed Sections: The subject of food science is divided into themed sections, each reviewed once a year.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Extrolites from nonaflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus: potentials and challenges as emerging control strategy against Aspergillus flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination Bovine lactoferrin and its potential use as a functional ingredient for tackling the global challenge of iron deficiency Overcoming the application limitations of pH-driven encapsulation of bioactive compounds: strategies and perspectives The relevance of genomics in food mycology with a focus on food safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1