The Market Dynamics of Collective Ignorance and Spiraling Risk

IF 5.7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Research Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1093/jcr/ucae018
Léna Pellandini-Simányi, Michelle Barnhart
{"title":"The Market Dynamics of Collective Ignorance and Spiraling Risk","authors":"Léna Pellandini-Simányi, Michelle Barnhart","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucae018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In some markets, offerings become riskier over time as producers introduce new versions that are more affordable due to their higher risk. Existing theories suggest consumers adopt riskier versions either because they become more risk tolerant or they trade higher risk for lower price—both of which presume consumers know the risks. We reveal a third explanation: evolving market dynamics that increasingly encourage consumer inattention to risk and produce “collective ignorance.” We identify social, cultural, and institutional drivers of collective inattention and propose a three-stage model of development of collective ignorance by analyzing the case of risk buildup in the Hungarian mortgage market. Data include interviews and institutional documents. Initially, producers offer low risk products, and social, cultural, and institutional factors encourage attention to risk. Consumers attentive to and capable of assessing risk become early adopters. Over time, increasing adoption and changes in market factors divert consumers’ attention from risk, shifting it to price. Under insufficient regulation, risk escalates: producers repeatedly cut price by offering increasingly risky products, while rising collective ignorance leads even risk-averse consumers to adopt them. We offer theoretical contributions to research on the social construction of risk, the attitude-behavior gap, and neoliberal responsibilization.","PeriodicalId":15555,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In some markets, offerings become riskier over time as producers introduce new versions that are more affordable due to their higher risk. Existing theories suggest consumers adopt riskier versions either because they become more risk tolerant or they trade higher risk for lower price—both of which presume consumers know the risks. We reveal a third explanation: evolving market dynamics that increasingly encourage consumer inattention to risk and produce “collective ignorance.” We identify social, cultural, and institutional drivers of collective inattention and propose a three-stage model of development of collective ignorance by analyzing the case of risk buildup in the Hungarian mortgage market. Data include interviews and institutional documents. Initially, producers offer low risk products, and social, cultural, and institutional factors encourage attention to risk. Consumers attentive to and capable of assessing risk become early adopters. Over time, increasing adoption and changes in market factors divert consumers’ attention from risk, shifting it to price. Under insufficient regulation, risk escalates: producers repeatedly cut price by offering increasingly risky products, while rising collective ignorance leads even risk-averse consumers to adopt them. We offer theoretical contributions to research on the social construction of risk, the attitude-behavior gap, and neoliberal responsibilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集体无知与风险螺旋上升的市场动态
在某些市场上,随着时间的推移,产品的风险会越来越大,因为生产商会推出新的产品,而新产品的风险较高,价格也更实惠。现有理论认为,消费者采用风险更高的产品,要么是因为他们的风险承受能力更强,要么是因为他们用更高的风险换取更低的价格--这两种理论都假定消费者知道风险。我们揭示了第三种解释:不断演变的市场动态越来越鼓励消费者不关注风险,并产生了 "集体无知"。我们通过分析匈牙利抵押贷款市场的风险积累案例,确定了集体无知的社会、文化和制度驱动因素,并提出了集体无知发展的三阶段模型。数据包括访谈和机构文件。起初,生产商提供低风险产品,社会、文化和制度因素鼓励人们关注风险。关注并有能力评估风险的消费者成为早期采用者。随着时间的推移,采用率的增加和市场因素的变化转移了消费者对风险的注意力,使其转向价格。在监管不力的情况下,风险不断升级:生产商通过提供风险越来越大的产品来一再降低价格,而集体无知的增加导致即使是规避风险的消费者也会采用这些产品。我们对风险的社会建构、态度-行为差距以及新自由主义责任化等方面的研究做出了理论贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Journal of Consumer Research, established in 1974, is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality empirical, theoretical, and methodological papers on a wide range of consumer research topics. The primary objective of JCR is to contribute to the advancement of understanding consumer behavior and the practice of consumer research. To be considered for publication in JCR, a paper must make a significant contribution to the existing body of knowledge in consumer research. It should aim to build upon, deepen, or challenge previous studies in the field of consumption, while providing both conceptual and empirical evidence to support its findings. JCR prioritizes multidisciplinary perspectives, encouraging contributions from various disciplines, methodological approaches, theoretical frameworks, and substantive problem areas. The journal aims to cater to a diverse readership base by welcoming articles derived from different orientations and paradigms. Overall, JCR is a valuable platform for scholars and researchers to share their work and contribute to the advancement of consumer research.
期刊最新文献
He Loves the One He Has Invested In: The Effects of Mating Cues on Men’s and Women’s Sunk Cost Bias Mixed Couples, Mixed Attitudes: How Interracial Couples in Marketing Appeals Influence Brand Outcomes Consumer Dirtwork: What Extraordinary Consumption Reveals about the Usefulness of Dirt Who Am I Here? Care Consumers’ Identity Processes and Family Caregiver Interventions in the Elderscape The Visual Complexity = Higher Production Cost Lay Belief
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1