Challenges in public policy for the implementation of pharmacogenetic tests in Europe

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL Biosocieties Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI:10.1057/s41292-023-00323-w
Bernice Azzopardi Meli, Anthony G. Fenech, Maria Cordina, Bridget Ellul, Emmanuel Agius
{"title":"Challenges in public policy for the implementation of pharmacogenetic tests in Europe","authors":"Bernice Azzopardi Meli, Anthony G. Fenech, Maria Cordina, Bridget Ellul, Emmanuel Agius","doi":"10.1057/s41292-023-00323-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pharmacogenetics innovation in biomedicine has fostered new hope in pharmacotherapeutics and in the prevention and management of adverse drug reactions. Proponents argue that pharmacogenetics will improve drug safety and efficacy while also revolutionising marketing. Integral to this survey is the recognition that pharmacogenetics has been hailed as a revolutionary frontier within biomedicine. This expectation amplifies the anticipation and promise associated with the emergence of new biotechnologies. This progress, however, raises several policy concerns with the need to balance the creation of a unified legal framework. We outline the European regulatory framework, and discuss the current challenges and opportunities related to licensing, the development of innovative medicines, cost-effectiveness, resource allocation, and stratification. There is the need to substantiate the value of a regulatory framework and vigilant monitoring to ensure equitable access and just distribution of the benefits of pharmacogenetics in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":46976,"journal":{"name":"Biosocieties","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosocieties","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-023-00323-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmacogenetics innovation in biomedicine has fostered new hope in pharmacotherapeutics and in the prevention and management of adverse drug reactions. Proponents argue that pharmacogenetics will improve drug safety and efficacy while also revolutionising marketing. Integral to this survey is the recognition that pharmacogenetics has been hailed as a revolutionary frontier within biomedicine. This expectation amplifies the anticipation and promise associated with the emergence of new biotechnologies. This progress, however, raises several policy concerns with the need to balance the creation of a unified legal framework. We outline the European regulatory framework, and discuss the current challenges and opportunities related to licensing, the development of innovative medicines, cost-effectiveness, resource allocation, and stratification. There is the need to substantiate the value of a regulatory framework and vigilant monitoring to ensure equitable access and just distribution of the benefits of pharmacogenetics in Europe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲实施药物基因检测的公共政策面临的挑战
生物医学中的药物基因学创新为药物治疗以及药物不良反应的预防和管理带来了新的希望。支持者认为,药物基因学将提高药物的安全性和有效性,同时也将彻底改变市场营销。这项调查的关键是认识到药物基因学被誉为生物医学的革命性前沿。这种期望增强了人们对新生物技术出现的期待和希望。然而,这一进展也引发了一些政策问题,需要在建立统一的法律框架之间取得平衡。我们概述了欧洲的监管框架,并讨论了当前与许可、创新药物开发、成本效益、资源分配和分层相关的挑战和机遇。有必要证实监管框架的价值并进行警惕性监测,以确保在欧洲公平获取和公正分配药物基因学的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biosocieties
Biosocieties SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: BioSocieties is committed to the scholarly exploration of the crucial social, ethical and policy implications of developments in the life sciences and biomedicine. These developments are increasing our ability to control our own biology; enabling us to create novel life forms; changing our ideas of ‘normality’ and ‘abnormality’; transforming our understanding of personal identity, family relations, ancestry and ‘race’; altering our social and personal expectations and responsibilities; reshaping global economic opportunities and inequalities; creating new global security challenges; and generating new social, ethical, legal and regulatory dilemmas. To address these dilemmas requires us to break out from narrow disciplinary boundaries within the social sciences and humanities, and between these disciplines and the natural sciences, and to develop new ways of thinking about the relations between biology and sociality and between the life sciences and society. BioSocieties provides a crucial forum where the most rigorous social research and critical analysis of these issues can intersect with the work of leading scientists, social researchers, clinicians, regulators and other stakeholders. BioSocieties defines the key intellectual issues at the science-society interface, and offers pathways to the resolution of the critical local, national and global socio-political challenges that arise from scientific and biomedical advances. As the first journal of its kind, BioSocieties publishes scholarship across the social science disciplines, and represents a lively and balanced array of perspectives on controversial issues. In its inaugural year BioSocieties demonstrated the constructive potential of interdisciplinary dialogue and debate across the social and natural sciences. We are becoming the journal of choice not only for social scientists, but also for life scientists interested in the larger social, ethical and policy implications of their work. The journal is international in scope, spanning research and developments in all corners of the globe. BioSocieties is published quarterly, with occasional themed issues that highlight some of the critical questions and problematics of modern biotechnologies. Articles, response pieces, review essays, and self-standing editorial pieces by social and life scientists form a regular part of the journal.
期刊最新文献
‘Our biology is listening’: biomarkers as molecular vestiges of early life and the production of positive childhood experiences in behavioral epigenetics Anticipating and suspending: the chronopolitics of cryopreservation From brain “scar” to “bat shit crazy”: negotiating the madness of sexual violence discourse What is the cure for absolute infertility? Biomedicalisation and routinisation of surrogacy and uterus transplantation in Nordic medical journals The politics of suspension suspended: the curious case of a cryopreserved cell product
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1