Survival throughout the annual cycle of first year Canada Jays in the context of sibling competition, expulsion, and adoption

Matthew Fuirst, Dan Strickland, Nikole E Freeman, Alex O Sutton, Brendan A Graham, Theresa Burg, D Ryan Norris
{"title":"Survival throughout the annual cycle of first year Canada Jays in the context of sibling competition, expulsion, and adoption","authors":"Matthew Fuirst, Dan Strickland, Nikole E Freeman, Alex O Sutton, Brendan A Graham, Theresa Burg, D Ryan Norris","doi":"10.1093/ornithology/ukae013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most birds that exhibit delayed dispersal (remaining on the natal territory rather than dispersing to seek a breeding opportunity), siblings appear free to stay or leave the natal area. However, in rare cases, delaying dispersal is determined via conflict among siblings, with the dominant individual remaining on the natal territory. We used radio-tracking to examine brood reduction, and subsequent juvenile survival, of first-year Canada Jays (Perisoreus canadensis) in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada. Soon after juveniles become nutritionally independent, intra-brood struggles lead to one “dominant juvenile” remaining on the natal territory after permanently expelling the subordinate siblings (“ejectees”). Males in above-average condition when nestlings were the most likely to become the dominant juveniles and females did so only when broods were all-female at the time of the expulsion. dominant juveniles were much more likely to survive their first summer compared to ejectees (survival probabilities = 0.84 and 0.45, respectively), suggesting that ejectees are especially vulnerable to mortality risk in the critical interval between their expulsion from the natal territory and their settlement on a new territory. However, if ejectees lived to autumn, they had only a slightly lower probability of first-winter survival (0.73) than dominant juveniles (0.85). These results suggest that the survival advantage gained by dominant juveniles is greatest during the first summer after hatching, with a much smaller difference over the first winter after ejectees have settled on non-natal territories. Our work provides insight into potential evolutionary and ecological mechanisms driving social dominance hierarchies in wild birds.","PeriodicalId":501265,"journal":{"name":"The Auk","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Auk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithology/ukae013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For most birds that exhibit delayed dispersal (remaining on the natal territory rather than dispersing to seek a breeding opportunity), siblings appear free to stay or leave the natal area. However, in rare cases, delaying dispersal is determined via conflict among siblings, with the dominant individual remaining on the natal territory. We used radio-tracking to examine brood reduction, and subsequent juvenile survival, of first-year Canada Jays (Perisoreus canadensis) in Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada. Soon after juveniles become nutritionally independent, intra-brood struggles lead to one “dominant juvenile” remaining on the natal territory after permanently expelling the subordinate siblings (“ejectees”). Males in above-average condition when nestlings were the most likely to become the dominant juveniles and females did so only when broods were all-female at the time of the expulsion. dominant juveniles were much more likely to survive their first summer compared to ejectees (survival probabilities = 0.84 and 0.45, respectively), suggesting that ejectees are especially vulnerable to mortality risk in the critical interval between their expulsion from the natal territory and their settlement on a new territory. However, if ejectees lived to autumn, they had only a slightly lower probability of first-winter survival (0.73) than dominant juveniles (0.85). These results suggest that the survival advantage gained by dominant juveniles is greatest during the first summer after hatching, with a much smaller difference over the first winter after ejectees have settled on non-natal territories. Our work provides insight into potential evolutionary and ecological mechanisms driving social dominance hierarchies in wild birds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在兄弟姐妹竞争、驱逐和收养的背景下,加拿大鸦雀第一年在整个年周期中的存活率
对于大多数表现出延迟散居(留在产地而不是散居去寻找繁殖机会)的鸟类来说,兄弟姐妹似乎可以自由地留在或离开产地。然而,在极少数情况下,兄弟姐妹之间的冲突决定了迁徙的延迟,占优势的个体会留在产地。我们在加拿大安大略省阿尔冈昆省立公园利用无线电跟踪研究了第一年加拿大松鸦(Perisoreus canadensis)的育雏减少情况以及随后的幼鸟存活情况。在幼鸟营养独立后不久,雏鸟内部的争斗导致一只 "占优势的幼鸟 "在永久性地驱逐了从属的兄弟姐妹("被驱逐者")后留在了出生地。雄性雏鸟在雏鸟时期的体质高于平均水平,最有可能成为占优势的幼鸟,而雌性雏鸟只有在被驱逐时全部是雌性的情况下才成为占优势的幼鸟。与被驱逐者相比,占优势的幼鸟更有可能在第一个夏天存活下来(存活概率分别为0.84和0.45),这表明被驱逐者在被驱逐出出生地和在新领地定居之间的关键时期特别容易面临死亡风险。然而,如果被驱逐者活到秋季,它们的初冬存活概率(0.73)仅略低于占优势的幼鸟(0.85)。这些结果表明,优势幼体在孵化后的第一个夏季获得的存活率优势最大,而被弹出的幼体在非出生地定居后的第一个冬季获得的存活率差异要小得多。我们的研究为研究野生鸟类社会优势等级的潜在进化和生态机制提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wildfire smoke impacts the body condition and capture rates of birds in California Year-round carryover effects are driven by migration phenology for Hirundo rustica (Barn Swallow) wintering in West Africa Individual foraging site fidelity persists within and across stopover seasons in a migratory shorebird, Numenius phaeopus (Whimbrel) Uropygial gland size increases isometrically with body size in 35 North American bird species Variation in nuptial color in relation to sex, individual quality and mating success in the sex-role reversed Phalaropus fulicarius (Red Phalarope)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1