Scoping review of factors associated with stem cell mobilisation and collection in allogeneic stem cell donors

Rachel Peck, Amber Knapp-Wilson, Kate Burley, Carolyn Doree, James Griffin, Andrew Mumford, Simon Stanworth, Kirsty Sharplin
{"title":"Scoping review of factors associated with stem cell mobilisation and collection in allogeneic stem cell donors","authors":"Rachel Peck, Amber Knapp-Wilson, Kate Burley, Carolyn Doree, James Griffin, Andrew Mumford, Simon Stanworth, Kirsty Sharplin","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.15.24304360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is a large inter-individual variation in CD34+ cell yield after G-CSF mobilisation and collection from peripheral blood in healthy allogenic haematopoietic stem cell donors. Donor characteristics including gender and age, baseline and precollection blood results, mobilisation factors and collection factors have been associated with CD34+ cell concentration in the blood after G-CSF mobilisation and/or\nCD34+ cell yield after collection. Since the literature reporting these associations is\nheterogeneous, we here clarify the determinants of CD34+ cell concentration and yield\nthrough a scoping literature review. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and Stem Cell Evidence were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2023. The inclusion criteria were studies of allogeneic donors undergoing G-CSF mobilisation and peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC). Eligible studies assessed an outcome of mobilisation or\ncollection efficacy, indicated by the blood CD34+ cell concentration after 4 or 5 days of\nG-CSF treatment and/or CD34+ cell yield in the first PBSC collection after mobilisation.\nIncluded studies assessed associations between these outcomes and donor factors(such as age, gender, weight, ethnicity), mobilisation factors (G-CSF scheduling or dose), collection factors (venous access, processed blood volume) and laboratory factors (such as blood cell counts at baseline and after mobilisation). Results: The 51 eligible studies evaluated between 23 and 20,884 donors. 43 studies were retrospective, 32 assessed blood CD34+ cell concentration after mobilisation and 37 assessed CD34+ cell yield. In studies that recorded both outcomes, blood CD34+ cell concentration always predicted CD34+ cell yield. The most frequently assessed factor was donor age for which most studies reported that younger donors had a higher\nblood CD34+ cell concentration and CD34+ cell yield. Non-European ancestry was associated with both higher blood CD34+ cell concentration and yield although this finding was inconsistent. Conclusions: There remains poor consensus about the best predictors of blood CD34+ cell concentration and yield that requires further prospective study, particularly of the role of donor ancestry. The current focus on donor gender as a major predictor may require re-evaluation","PeriodicalId":501203,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.15.24304360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a large inter-individual variation in CD34+ cell yield after G-CSF mobilisation and collection from peripheral blood in healthy allogenic haematopoietic stem cell donors. Donor characteristics including gender and age, baseline and precollection blood results, mobilisation factors and collection factors have been associated with CD34+ cell concentration in the blood after G-CSF mobilisation and/or CD34+ cell yield after collection. Since the literature reporting these associations is heterogeneous, we here clarify the determinants of CD34+ cell concentration and yield through a scoping literature review. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and Stem Cell Evidence were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2023. The inclusion criteria were studies of allogeneic donors undergoing G-CSF mobilisation and peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC). Eligible studies assessed an outcome of mobilisation or collection efficacy, indicated by the blood CD34+ cell concentration after 4 or 5 days of G-CSF treatment and/or CD34+ cell yield in the first PBSC collection after mobilisation. Included studies assessed associations between these outcomes and donor factors(such as age, gender, weight, ethnicity), mobilisation factors (G-CSF scheduling or dose), collection factors (venous access, processed blood volume) and laboratory factors (such as blood cell counts at baseline and after mobilisation). Results: The 51 eligible studies evaluated between 23 and 20,884 donors. 43 studies were retrospective, 32 assessed blood CD34+ cell concentration after mobilisation and 37 assessed CD34+ cell yield. In studies that recorded both outcomes, blood CD34+ cell concentration always predicted CD34+ cell yield. The most frequently assessed factor was donor age for which most studies reported that younger donors had a higher blood CD34+ cell concentration and CD34+ cell yield. Non-European ancestry was associated with both higher blood CD34+ cell concentration and yield although this finding was inconsistent. Conclusions: There remains poor consensus about the best predictors of blood CD34+ cell concentration and yield that requires further prospective study, particularly of the role of donor ancestry. The current focus on donor gender as a major predictor may require re-evaluation
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异体干细胞捐献者干细胞动员和采集相关因素的范围审查
背景:健康的异基因造血干细胞捐献者经G-CSF动员和采集外周血后,CD34+细胞产量存在很大的个体差异。捐献者特征(包括性别和年龄、基线和采集前血液结果、动员因素和采集因素)与G-CSF动员后血液中CD34+细胞浓度和/或采集后CD34+细胞产量有关。由于报道这些关联的文献不尽相同,我们在此通过范围性文献综述来阐明 CD34+ 细胞浓度和产量的决定因素。材料与方法:在 MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed 和 Stem Cell Evidence 中检索了 2000 年至 2023 年间发表的研究。纳入标准是对异体捐献者进行G-CSF动员和外周血干细胞采集(PBSC)的研究。纳入的研究评估了这些结果与捐献者因素(如年龄、性别、体重、种族)、动员因素(G-CSF排期或剂量)、采集因素(静脉通路、处理血量)和实验室因素(如动员时和动员后的血细胞计数)之间的关联。结果:符合条件的 51 项研究对 23 至 20,884 名捐献者进行了评估。43项研究为回顾性研究,32项研究评估了动员后血液中CD34+细胞的浓度,37项研究评估了CD34+细胞的产量。在记录了这两项结果的研究中,血液 CD34+ 细胞浓度总是能预测 CD34+ 细胞产量。最常评估的因素是供者年龄,大多数研究报告称,年轻供者的血液 CD34+ 细胞浓度和 CD34+ 细胞产量较高。非欧洲血统与较高的血液 CD34+ 细胞浓度和产量有关,但这一结论并不一致。结论:关于血液 CD34+ 细胞浓度和产量的最佳预测因素仍未达成共识,这需要进一步的前瞻性研究,尤其是关于供体血统的作用。目前将捐献者性别作为主要预测因素的做法可能需要重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning Insights into HLA Noncoding Sequence Mismatches and Their Impact on DPB1 Matching in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comparison of haemoglobin concentration measurements using HemoCue-301 and Sysmex XN-Series 1500: a survey among anaemic Gambian infants aged 6-12 months Detection of Common Deletion Mutations (− α3.7 and − α4.2 kb) in HBA gene and Genotype-Phenotype Correlation Multi-omic and functional screening reveal targetable vulnerabilities in TP53 mutated multiple myeloma Evaluating the Therapeutic Effects of Amino Acid Treatment on Vaso-Occlusive Pain in Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1