Validity of bioelectric impedance analysis for body composition assessment in interstitial lung disease patients.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BUSINESS Nutricion hospitalaria Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.20960/nh.04882
Gabriela Rosaura García Del Valle-Alegría, Iván Armando Osuna-Padilla, Ana Lucía Gómez-Rodríguez, Aime Alarcón-Dionet, Zobeida Rodriguez-Díaz, Ivette Buendía-Roldán
{"title":"Validity of bioelectric impedance analysis for body composition assessment in interstitial lung disease patients.","authors":"Gabriela Rosaura García Del Valle-Alegría, Iván Armando Osuna-Padilla, Ana Lucía Gómez-Rodríguez, Aime Alarcón-Dionet, Zobeida Rodriguez-Díaz, Ivette Buendía-Roldán","doi":"10.20960/nh.04882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Background: changes in body composition (BC) are common in interstitial lung disease, which leads to an increased risk of complications and infections, and are associated with poor quality of life and worse outcomes. BC assessment is important to identify malnutrition and sarcopenia. However, gold-standard techniques are not available in all clinical settings. Aims: this study aimed to evaluate the agreement and reliability of body composition estimated by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) and measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in women with interstitial lung disease. Methods: this is a cross-sectional study. BC (fat mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass) were assessed using BIA multifrequency and DEXA in standardized conditions. Agreement and reliability between techniques were evaluated using Bland-Altman plots and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: a total of 50 women were evaluated. No differences were observed for FM (BIA, 25.8 ± 10.2 kg and DEXA, 26.3 ± 10.0 kg, p = 0.77) and ASMM (BIA, 14.1 ± 2.7 kg and DEXA, 13.9 ± 2.3 kg, p = 0.83). Based on ICC, good reliability was observed for FM (ICC, 0.98) and ASMM (ICC, 0.93). Conclusion: BC estimated by BIA showed good agreement and reliability with DEXA measurements. In the absence of this method, BIA can replace the DEXA technique for body composition assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19385,"journal":{"name":"Nutricion hospitalaria","volume":" ","pages":"810-814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutricion hospitalaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.04882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Background: changes in body composition (BC) are common in interstitial lung disease, which leads to an increased risk of complications and infections, and are associated with poor quality of life and worse outcomes. BC assessment is important to identify malnutrition and sarcopenia. However, gold-standard techniques are not available in all clinical settings. Aims: this study aimed to evaluate the agreement and reliability of body composition estimated by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) and measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in women with interstitial lung disease. Methods: this is a cross-sectional study. BC (fat mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass) were assessed using BIA multifrequency and DEXA in standardized conditions. Agreement and reliability between techniques were evaluated using Bland-Altman plots and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: a total of 50 women were evaluated. No differences were observed for FM (BIA, 25.8 ± 10.2 kg and DEXA, 26.3 ± 10.0 kg, p = 0.77) and ASMM (BIA, 14.1 ± 2.7 kg and DEXA, 13.9 ± 2.3 kg, p = 0.83). Based on ICC, good reliability was observed for FM (ICC, 0.98) and ASMM (ICC, 0.93). Conclusion: BC estimated by BIA showed good agreement and reliability with DEXA measurements. In the absence of this method, BIA can replace the DEXA technique for body composition assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物电阻抗分析用于间质性肺病患者身体成分评估的有效性。
背景:身体成分(BC)的变化在间质性肺病中很常见,这会导致并发症和感染的风险增加,并与生活质量低下和预后恶化有关。BC评估对于识别营养不良和肌肉疏松症非常重要。目的:本研究旨在评估间质性肺病女性患者通过生物电阻抗分析法(BIA)估算的身体成分与使用双能 X 射线吸收测量法(DEXA)测量的身体成分的一致性和可靠性。方法:这是一项横断面研究,在标准化条件下使用 BIA 多频和 DEXA 评估 BC(脂肪量和骨骼肌量)。使用Bland-Altman图和类内相关系数(ICC)评估了不同技术之间的一致性和可靠性。在 FM(BIA,25.8 ± 10.2 kg,DEXA,26.3 ± 10.0 kg,p = 0.77)和 ASMM(BIA,14.1 ± 2.7 kg,DEXA,13.9 ± 2.3 kg,p = 0.83)方面未观察到差异。根据 ICC,FM(ICC,0.98)和 ASMM(ICC,0.93)具有良好的可靠性:结论:BIA 估算的 BC 值与 DEXA 测量值具有良好的一致性和可靠性。结论:BIA 估测的 BC 值与 DEXA 测量值具有良好的一致性和可靠性,在没有这种方法的情况下,BIA 可以替代 DEXA 技术进行身体成分评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutricion hospitalaria
Nutricion hospitalaria 医学-营养学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Nutrición Hospitalaria was born following the SENPE Bulletin (1981-1983) and the SENPE journal (1984-1985). It is the official organ of expression of the Spanish Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Throughout its 36 years of existence has been adapting to the rhythms and demands set by the scientific community and the trends of the editorial processes, being its most recent milestone the achievement of Impact Factor (JCR) in 2009. Its content covers the fields of the sciences of nutrition, with special emphasis on nutritional support.
期刊最新文献
[Update on the consensus for hospital coding according to GLIM criteria: an approach adapted to hospital complexity]. Consumption of ultra-processed foods raises the possibility of cardiovascular disease - A meta-analysis. [Maternal perception of hunger-satiety signals and their impact on feeding and nutritional status of infants in Mexico]. [Nutritional risk assessment by STAMP according to type of congenital heart disease in pediatric patients admitted to a reference hospital]. Influence of nutritional risk assessment on the prognosis of trauma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1