States of epistemic curiosity interfere with memory for incidental scholastic facts.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH npj Science of Learning Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1038/s41539-024-00234-w
Nicole E Keller, Carola Salvi, Emily K Leiker, Matthias J Gruber, Joseph E Dunsmoor
{"title":"States of epistemic curiosity interfere with memory for incidental scholastic facts.","authors":"Nicole E Keller, Carola Salvi, Emily K Leiker, Matthias J Gruber, Joseph E Dunsmoor","doi":"10.1038/s41539-024-00234-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Curiosity can be a powerful motivator to learn and retain new information. Evidence shows that high states of curiosity elicited by a specific source (i.e., a trivia question) can promote memory for incidental stimuli (non-target) presented close in time. The spreading effect of curiosity states on memory for other information has potential for educational applications. Specifically, it could provide techniques to improve learning for information that did not spark a sense of curiosity on its own. Here, we investigated how high states of curiosity induced through trivia questions affect memory performance for unrelated scholastic facts (e.g., scientific, English, or historical facts) presented in close temporal proximity to the trivia question. Across three task versions, participants viewed trivia questions closely followed in time by a scholastic fact unrelated to the trivia question, either just prior to or immediately following the answer to the trivia question. Participants then completed a surprise multiple-choice memory test (akin to a pop quiz) for the scholastic material. In all three task versions, memory performance was poorer for scholastic facts presented after trivia questions that had elicited high versus low levels of curiosity. These results contradict previous findings showing curiosity-enhanced memory for incidentally presented visual stimuli and suggest that target information that generates a high-curiosity state interferes with encoding complex and unrelated scholastic facts presented close in time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48503,"journal":{"name":"npj Science of Learning","volume":"9 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Science of Learning","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00234-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Curiosity can be a powerful motivator to learn and retain new information. Evidence shows that high states of curiosity elicited by a specific source (i.e., a trivia question) can promote memory for incidental stimuli (non-target) presented close in time. The spreading effect of curiosity states on memory for other information has potential for educational applications. Specifically, it could provide techniques to improve learning for information that did not spark a sense of curiosity on its own. Here, we investigated how high states of curiosity induced through trivia questions affect memory performance for unrelated scholastic facts (e.g., scientific, English, or historical facts) presented in close temporal proximity to the trivia question. Across three task versions, participants viewed trivia questions closely followed in time by a scholastic fact unrelated to the trivia question, either just prior to or immediately following the answer to the trivia question. Participants then completed a surprise multiple-choice memory test (akin to a pop quiz) for the scholastic material. In all three task versions, memory performance was poorer for scholastic facts presented after trivia questions that had elicited high versus low levels of curiosity. These results contradict previous findings showing curiosity-enhanced memory for incidentally presented visual stimuli and suggest that target information that generates a high-curiosity state interferes with encoding complex and unrelated scholastic facts presented close in time.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识上的好奇心状态会干扰对偶然学业事实的记忆。
好奇心是学习和保留新信息的强大动力。有证据表明,由特定信息源(如琐事问题)引起的高度好奇心状态可以促进人们对时间上接近的偶然刺激(非目标信息)的记忆。好奇心状态对其他信息记忆的扩散效应具有潜在的教育应用价值。具体来说,它可以提供一些技巧,以提高那些本身并没有引发好奇心的信息的学习效果。在这里,我们研究了通过琐事问题诱发的高度好奇状态如何影响对与琐事问题在时间上接近的不相关的学术事实(如科学、英语或历史事实)的记忆表现。在三个任务版本中,受试者在观看小问题的同时,紧接着在小问题答案之前或之后观看与小问题无关的学术事实。然后,受试者完成一项针对学术材料的突击性多选记忆测试(类似于突击测验)。在所有三个任务版本中,对于在小问题之后出现的学术事实,好奇心水平高的人和好奇心水平低的人的记忆表现都要差一些。这些结果与之前的研究结果相矛盾,之前的研究结果表明,好奇心会增强对偶然出现的视觉刺激的记忆,而这些结果表明,产生高好奇心状态的目标信息会干扰对近距离出现的复杂而不相关的学术事实的编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal predictions guide attention throughout the adult lifespan. Interbrain neural correlates of self and other integration in joint statistical learning. Feature versus object in interpreting working memory capacity. Mathematics interest, self-efficacy, and anxiety predict STEM career choice in emerging adulthood. Enhancing mathematical learning outcomes through a low-cost single-channel BCI system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1