Unlocking the potential: Expert insights on the long-term compatibility of forest carbon credits with the EU ETS

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103185
Sebastian Bleuel , Carsten Müller
{"title":"Unlocking the potential: Expert insights on the long-term compatibility of forest carbon credits with the EU ETS","authors":"Sebastian Bleuel ,&nbsp;Carsten Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forest-based carbon credits, primarily domestic, are crucial in many Emissions Trading Schemes as they offer a cost-efficient means of offsetting hard-to-abate emissions. To date, forest-based credits are not accepted in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). However, with the Paris Agreement rulebook now largely finalized, a revival of a flexibility mechanism in European climate policy is plausible. Based on 24 expert interviews, we examined the forest potential within the EU ETS across short-, medium-, and long-term time frames. Even though the compliance system remains ineligible for carbon credits until 2030, we found there is a likelihood of transitioning towards the inclusion of forest-based removals and reductions in the long term. Although forestry projects have faced significant reluctance in the EU, there is unanimous agreement on the importance of such initiatives and technological solutions for climate protection. To fully leverage the potential of forest activity in the future, it will be necessary to adopt different methods, tools (e.g., liability regimes), and stricter socio-economic legislation (e.g., land use rights), overcome implementation hurdles (e.g., not compromise deterrence through mitigation), and maintain an open political stance. This study provides a comprehensive perspective on the barriers and potential of forestry projects within the EU compliance system. The research findings could help ensure immediate attention to the barriers when the discussion on future eligibility resumes to be ready for carbon credits in the next phase of the EU ETS from 2030.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000388","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest-based carbon credits, primarily domestic, are crucial in many Emissions Trading Schemes as they offer a cost-efficient means of offsetting hard-to-abate emissions. To date, forest-based credits are not accepted in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). However, with the Paris Agreement rulebook now largely finalized, a revival of a flexibility mechanism in European climate policy is plausible. Based on 24 expert interviews, we examined the forest potential within the EU ETS across short-, medium-, and long-term time frames. Even though the compliance system remains ineligible for carbon credits until 2030, we found there is a likelihood of transitioning towards the inclusion of forest-based removals and reductions in the long term. Although forestry projects have faced significant reluctance in the EU, there is unanimous agreement on the importance of such initiatives and technological solutions for climate protection. To fully leverage the potential of forest activity in the future, it will be necessary to adopt different methods, tools (e.g., liability regimes), and stricter socio-economic legislation (e.g., land use rights), overcome implementation hurdles (e.g., not compromise deterrence through mitigation), and maintain an open political stance. This study provides a comprehensive perspective on the barriers and potential of forestry projects within the EU compliance system. The research findings could help ensure immediate attention to the barriers when the discussion on future eligibility resumes to be ready for carbon credits in the next phase of the EU ETS from 2030.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
释放潜力:关于森林碳信用额与欧盟排放交易计划长期兼容性的专家见解
以森林为基础的碳信用额(主要是国内碳信用额)在许多排放交易计划中至关重要,因为它们为抵消难以消减的排放量提供了一种具有成本效益的方法。迄今为止,欧盟排放交易计划(EU ETS)还不接受森林碳信用额。然而,随着《巴黎协定》规则手册的基本定稿,在欧洲气候政策中恢复灵活机制是有可能的。基于 24 次专家访谈,我们研究了欧盟排放交易计划在短期、中期和长期时间框架内的森林潜力。尽管在 2030 年之前,履约系统仍无资格获得碳信用额,但我们发现,从长远来看,有可能过渡到纳入基于森林的清除量和减排量。虽然林业项目在欧盟面临着很大的阻力,但大家一致认为这些举措和技术解决方案对气候保护非常重要。为了在未来充分发挥森林活动的潜力,有必要采用不同的方法、工具(如责任制度)和更严格的社会经济立法(如土地使用权),克服实施障碍(如不通过减排损害威慑力),并保持开放的政治立场。本研究从一个全面的角度探讨了林业项目在欧盟履约体系中的障碍和潜力。研究结果有助于确保在重新讨论未来资格时立即关注这些障碍,以便为 2030 年起欧盟排放交易计划下一阶段的碳信用额做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Actors, discourses and relations in the Finnish newspapers' forest discussion: Enabling or constraining the sustainability transition? Leveraging the value chain-landscape governance nexus for non-wood forest products and tropical forest restoration Forest fire causes and prevention strategies in Portugal: Insights from stakeholder focus groups Trends in forest livelihoods research – Taking stock in 2024 The legally binding agreement on forests in Europe – Analyzing the unsuccessful attempts at regional regime creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1