Machine learning prediction models for ground motion parameters and seismic damage assessment of buildings at a regional scale

Sanjeev Bhatta , Xiandong Kang , Ji Dang
{"title":"Machine learning prediction models for ground motion parameters and seismic damage assessment of buildings at a regional scale","authors":"Sanjeev Bhatta ,&nbsp;Xiandong Kang ,&nbsp;Ji Dang","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the feasibility of using a machine learning approach for rapid damage assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings after the earthquake. Since the real-world damaged datasets are lacking, have limited access, or are imbalanced, a simulation dataset is prepared by conducting a nonlinear time history analysis. Different machine learning (ML) models are trained considering the structural parameters and ground motion characteristics to predict the RC building damage into five categories: null, slight, moderate, heavy, and collapse. The random forest classifier (RFC) has achieved a higher prediction accuracy on testing and real-world damaged datasets. The structural parameters can be extracted using different means such as Google Earth, Open Street Map, unmanned aerial vehicles, etc. However, recording the ground motion at a closer distance requires the installation of a dense array of sensors which requires a higher cost. For places with no earthquake recording station/device, it is difficult to have ground motion characteristics. For that different ML-based regressor models are developed utilizing past-earthquake information to predict ground motion parameters such as peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity. The random forest regressor (RFR) achieved better results than other regression models on testing and validation datasets. Furthermore, compared with the results of similar research works, a better result is obtained using RFC and RFR on validation datasets. In the end, these models are utilized to predict the damage categories of RC buildings at Saitama University and Okubo Danchi, Saitama, Japan after an earthquake. This damage information is crucial for government agencies or decision-makers to respond systematically in post-disaster situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 84-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000048/pdfft?md5=d8fbc4dce242235d9a3f487633f83d32&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000048-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resilient Cities and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the feasibility of using a machine learning approach for rapid damage assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings after the earthquake. Since the real-world damaged datasets are lacking, have limited access, or are imbalanced, a simulation dataset is prepared by conducting a nonlinear time history analysis. Different machine learning (ML) models are trained considering the structural parameters and ground motion characteristics to predict the RC building damage into five categories: null, slight, moderate, heavy, and collapse. The random forest classifier (RFC) has achieved a higher prediction accuracy on testing and real-world damaged datasets. The structural parameters can be extracted using different means such as Google Earth, Open Street Map, unmanned aerial vehicles, etc. However, recording the ground motion at a closer distance requires the installation of a dense array of sensors which requires a higher cost. For places with no earthquake recording station/device, it is difficult to have ground motion characteristics. For that different ML-based regressor models are developed utilizing past-earthquake information to predict ground motion parameters such as peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity. The random forest regressor (RFR) achieved better results than other regression models on testing and validation datasets. Furthermore, compared with the results of similar research works, a better result is obtained using RFC and RFR on validation datasets. In the end, these models are utilized to predict the damage categories of RC buildings at Saitama University and Okubo Danchi, Saitama, Japan after an earthquake. This damage information is crucial for government agencies or decision-makers to respond systematically in post-disaster situations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域范围内地面运动参数和建筑物震害评估的机器学习预测模型
本研究探讨了使用机器学习方法对地震后钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑进行快速损坏评估的可行性。由于真实世界的受损数据集缺乏、获取途径有限或不平衡,因此通过进行非线性时间历史分析来准备模拟数据集。考虑到结构参数和地面运动特征,对不同的机器学习(ML)模型进行了训练,以预测 RC 建筑的损坏分为五类:无损坏、轻微损坏、中度损坏、严重损坏和倒塌。随机森林分类器(RFC)在测试和实际受损数据集上取得了更高的预测精度。结构参数可以通过谷歌地球、开放街道地图、无人机等不同方式提取。然而,在较近距离记录地面运动需要安装密集的传感器阵列,成本较高。对于没有地震记录站/设备的地方,很难获得地面运动特征。为此,我们开发了不同的基于 ML 的回归模型,利用过去的地震信息来预测地面运动参数,如峰值地面加速度和峰值地面速度。在测试和验证数据集上,随机森林回归模型(RFR)比其他回归模型取得了更好的结果。此外,与同类研究成果相比,在验证数据集上使用 RFC 和 RFR 取得了更好的结果。最后,这些模型被用于预测日本埼玉大学和大久保团地的 RC 建筑在地震后的损坏类别。这些损坏信息对于政府机构或决策者在灾后做出系统性响应至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated knowledge graphs for complex systems (AutoGraCS): Applications to management of bridge networks Uncovering implicit Seismogenic associated regions towards promoting urban resilience Building Stock and Emission Models for Jakarta Key networks to create disaster resilient Smart Cities Mission: A case for remodeling India's Smart Cities Mission to include disaster resilience Landslide-oriented disaster resilience evaluation in mountainous cities: A case study in Chongqing, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1