Numerical study on the shear strength of granular materials under the low confining pressure

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soils and Foundations Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101447
Daosheng Ling, Tiantian Hu, Jing Wang, Xiukai Wang, Changyu Shi, Yao Tang
{"title":"Numerical study on the shear strength of granular materials under the low confining pressure","authors":"Daosheng Ling,&nbsp;Tiantian Hu,&nbsp;Jing Wang,&nbsp;Xiukai Wang,&nbsp;Changyu Shi,&nbsp;Yao Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The relationship between stress and strength in granular soil differs under low confining pressure as compared to high confining pressure, which is of great importance for the geotechnical engineering. Numerical simulations using discrete element method (DEM) are conducted to model consolidated-drained triaxial compression tests, with the confining pressure <em>σ<sub>c</sub></em> ranging from 1 to1000 kPa. From the analysis of the shear strength of granular soils under various confining pressures and void ratios, it is found that the peak stress ratio <em>η<sub>p</sub></em> under a low <em>σ<sub>c</sub></em> is significantly lower than that under the high <em>σ<sub>c</sub></em>, particularly for samples with the same initial void ratio. As the confining pressure increases, <em>η<sub>p</sub></em> for samples with the same initial void ratio increases up to 29 % under the low <em>σ<sub>c</sub></em> while stabilizing under the high <em>σ<sub>c</sub></em>. Conversely, <em>η<sub>p</sub></em> for samples with the same void ratio after the consolidation can increase up to 13.5 % under the low <em>σ<sub>c</sub></em> while declining under the high <em>σ<sub>c</sub></em>. In addition, the critical confining pressure distinguishing the low and high confining pressures is about 200 kPa for dense samples with initial void ratio of 0.605 used in the study, and it increases as the sample void ratio increases. From the microscopic analysis, the variation of <em>η<sub>p</sub></em> under the low <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> can be attributed to the enhanced anisotropy of normal contact force and contact normal under the low confining pressure. Finally, a modified Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion is proposed, which can determine the strength of granular soils under the low confining pressure with different void ratios.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":"64 3","pages":"Article 101447"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000258/pdfft?md5=5e464d409fd2da760db26d3c389ef1b4&pid=1-s2.0-S0038080624000258-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624000258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between stress and strength in granular soil differs under low confining pressure as compared to high confining pressure, which is of great importance for the geotechnical engineering. Numerical simulations using discrete element method (DEM) are conducted to model consolidated-drained triaxial compression tests, with the confining pressure σc ranging from 1 to1000 kPa. From the analysis of the shear strength of granular soils under various confining pressures and void ratios, it is found that the peak stress ratio ηp under a low σc is significantly lower than that under the high σc, particularly for samples with the same initial void ratio. As the confining pressure increases, ηp for samples with the same initial void ratio increases up to 29 % under the low σc while stabilizing under the high σc. Conversely, ηp for samples with the same void ratio after the consolidation can increase up to 13.5 % under the low σc while declining under the high σc. In addition, the critical confining pressure distinguishing the low and high confining pressures is about 200 kPa for dense samples with initial void ratio of 0.605 used in the study, and it increases as the sample void ratio increases. From the microscopic analysis, the variation of ηp under the low σc can be attributed to the enhanced anisotropy of normal contact force and contact normal under the low confining pressure. Finally, a modified Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion is proposed, which can determine the strength of granular soils under the low confining pressure with different void ratios.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低约束压力下颗粒材料剪切强度的数值研究
与高约束压力相比,低约束压力下颗粒土的应力和强度之间的关系有所不同,这对岩土工程至关重要。利用离散元法(DEM)对固结排水三轴压缩试验进行了数值模拟,固结压力 σc 在 1 至 1000 kPa 之间。通过分析不同约束压力和空隙率条件下颗粒土的抗剪强度,发现低σc条件下的峰值应力比ηp明显低于高σc条件下的峰值应力比ηp,尤其是对于初始空隙率相同的样品。随着约束压力的增加,具有相同初始空隙率的样品的 ηp 在低σc 条件下最多可增加 29%,而在高σc 条件下则趋于稳定。相反,固结后具有相同空隙率的样品的 ηp 在低σc 条件下可增加达 13.5%,而在高σc 条件下则下降。此外,对于研究中使用的初始空隙率为 0.605 的致密样品,区分低约束压力和高约束压力的临界约束压力约为 200 kPa,并且随着样品空隙率的增加而增加。从微观分析来看,低 σc 条件下 ηp 的变化可归因于低约束压力下法线接触力和接触法线的各向异性增强。最后,提出了修正的莫尔-库仑破坏准则,该准则可确定不同空隙率的低密闭压力下的粒土强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
期刊最新文献
Efficient reliability analysis of unsaturated slope stability under rapid drawdown using XGBoost-based surrogate model Advancement ratio effect on screw pile performance in the bearing layer Spatial earth pressure analysis of clayey fill behind retaining wall in V-shaped gully terrain Instability of sand under a lateral extrusion stress path with different drainage conditions Electrodeposition-based self-healing technique for structures with loosely compacted sand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1