Earthworms as soil health indicators in no-tillage agroecosystems

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY European Journal of Soil Biology Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103605
Marie Luise Carolina Bartz , Rafaela Tavares Dudas , Wilian Carlo Demetrio , George Gardner Brown
{"title":"Earthworms as soil health indicators in no-tillage agroecosystems","authors":"Marie Luise Carolina Bartz ,&nbsp;Rafaela Tavares Dudas ,&nbsp;Wilian Carlo Demetrio ,&nbsp;George Gardner Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>No-tillage (NT) and no-tillage systems (NTS) are widely used conservation agriculture practices in Brazil, and in the state of Paraná, nearly 80% of annual crops are cultivated using these methods. Compared with NT, NTS sites permanently include: minimum soil disturbance, soil cover (straw and living vegetation) and crop rotation and diversification with cover crops. These practices often increase earthworm populations, that can be used to indicate soil health. Herein, we review soil health classification of NT sites, and the species found in Paraná state. We compiled information from 130 sites with NT or NTS, located in 29 counties, of which 93 had biomass and 91 had species richness data, aiming to compare NT with NTS sites, and the effect of the age of these practices on earthworm populations. Overall, 29 earthworm species were recorded, of which 17 were native, including many new to science. Mean abundance and biomass in NT + NTS were 104 ind m<sup>−2</sup> and 2.5 g m<sup>−2</sup>, respectively, and richness 2.5 species per site. Abundance was significantly higher in NT than NTS in the initial phase of adoption, and both abundance and biomass decreased with increasing age of NT. Earthworm abundance and species richness were positively correlated with clayey soils and phosphorus content, while higher biomass was associated with soil carbon content and pH. A new classification system was proposed, with the categories poor (&lt;50 ind. m<sup>−2</sup>, 1 species), moderate (≥50 to &lt;100 ind m<sup>−2</sup>, 2 species), good (≥100 to &lt;150 ind m<sup>−2</sup>, 3 species), very good (≥150 to 200 ind m<sup>−2</sup>, 4 species) and excellent (≥200 ind m<sup>−2</sup>, ≥5 species) soil health, using earthworm abundance and species richness, respectively. Most of the sites sampled showed poor or moderate soil health, with few displaying very good or excellent health, indicating the need for improved management practices, in order to promote earthworm populations and their potential benefits to soil fertility and plant production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103605"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

No-tillage (NT) and no-tillage systems (NTS) are widely used conservation agriculture practices in Brazil, and in the state of Paraná, nearly 80% of annual crops are cultivated using these methods. Compared with NT, NTS sites permanently include: minimum soil disturbance, soil cover (straw and living vegetation) and crop rotation and diversification with cover crops. These practices often increase earthworm populations, that can be used to indicate soil health. Herein, we review soil health classification of NT sites, and the species found in Paraná state. We compiled information from 130 sites with NT or NTS, located in 29 counties, of which 93 had biomass and 91 had species richness data, aiming to compare NT with NTS sites, and the effect of the age of these practices on earthworm populations. Overall, 29 earthworm species were recorded, of which 17 were native, including many new to science. Mean abundance and biomass in NT + NTS were 104 ind m−2 and 2.5 g m−2, respectively, and richness 2.5 species per site. Abundance was significantly higher in NT than NTS in the initial phase of adoption, and both abundance and biomass decreased with increasing age of NT. Earthworm abundance and species richness were positively correlated with clayey soils and phosphorus content, while higher biomass was associated with soil carbon content and pH. A new classification system was proposed, with the categories poor (<50 ind. m−2, 1 species), moderate (≥50 to <100 ind m−2, 2 species), good (≥100 to <150 ind m−2, 3 species), very good (≥150 to 200 ind m−2, 4 species) and excellent (≥200 ind m−2, ≥5 species) soil health, using earthworm abundance and species richness, respectively. Most of the sites sampled showed poor or moderate soil health, with few displaying very good or excellent health, indicating the need for improved management practices, in order to promote earthworm populations and their potential benefits to soil fertility and plant production.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蚯蚓作为免耕农业生态系统中的土壤健康指标
免耕(NT)和免耕系统(NTS)是巴西广泛采用的保护性农业耕作方法,在巴拉那州,近 80% 的一年生作物都是采用这些方法种植的。与免耕法相比,免耕法永久性地包括:最小化土壤扰动、土壤覆盖(秸秆和有生命的植被)、作物轮作和覆盖作物多样化。这些做法通常会增加蚯蚓数量,而蚯蚓数量可用于表明土壤健康状况。在此,我们回顾了巴拉那州新界地区的土壤健康分类以及发现的蚯蚓种类。我们汇编了分布在 29 个县的 130 个 "新耕地 "或 "非耕地 "地点的信息,其中 93 个地点有生物量数据,91 个地点有物种丰富度数据,目的是比较 "新耕地 "和 "非耕地 "地点,以及这些耕作方法的使用年限对蚯蚓种群的影响。总共记录了 29 种蚯蚓,其中 17 种是本地蚯蚓,包括许多科学界新发现的蚯蚓。新界 + 非湿地的平均丰度和生物量分别为 104 ind m-2 和 2.5 g m-2,每个地点的物种丰富度为 2.5。在采用NT的初期阶段,NT的丰量明显高于NTS,随着NT使用年限的增加,丰量和生物量都有所下降。蚯蚓的丰度和物种丰富度与粘性土壤和磷含量呈正相关,而生物量的提高则与土壤碳含量和 pH 值有关。提出了一种新的分类系统,利用蚯蚓丰度和物种丰富度,分别将土壤健康状况分为差(<50 ind. m-2,1 种)、中(≥50 至 <100 ind m-2,2 种)、好(≥100 至 <150 ind m-2,3 种)、很好(≥150 至 200 ind m-2,4 种)和优(≥200 ind m-2,≥5 种)。大多数采样点的土壤健康状况为较差或中等,只有极少数采样点的土壤健康状况为非常好或极好,这表明有必要改进管理方法,以提高蚯蚓数量及其对土壤肥力和植物产量的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
期刊最新文献
In-depth insights into carbohydrate-active enzyme genes regarding the disparities in soil organic carbon after 12-year rotational cropping system field study Nutrient supply enhances positive priming of soil organic C under straw amendment and accelerates the incorporation of straw-derived C into organic C pool in paddy soils Dynamics of nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen cycling functional genes in response to soil pore size distribution Soil microbial resistance and resilience to drought under organic and conventional farming Plantation conversion of Eucalyptus promotes soil microbial necromass C accumulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1