Comparison of troponin and natriuretic peptides in Takotsubo syndrome and acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002607
Liam Steven Couch, James W Garrard, John A Henry, Rafail A Kotronias, Bashir Alaour, Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Keith M Channon, Adrian P Banning, Alexander Richard Lyon, Michael Marber, Thomas Edward Kaier
{"title":"Comparison of troponin and natriuretic peptides in Takotsubo syndrome and acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis","authors":"Liam Steven Couch, James W Garrard, John A Henry, Rafail A Kotronias, Bashir Alaour, Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Keith M Channon, Adrian P Banning, Alexander Richard Lyon, Michael Marber, Thomas Edward Kaier","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute heart failure syndrome which resembles acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at presentation. Differentiation requires coronary angiography, but where this does not occur immediately, cardiac biomarkers may provide additional utility. We performed a meta-analysis to compare troponin and natriuretic peptides (NPs) in TTS and ACS to determine if differences in biomarker profile can aid diagnosis. Methods We searched five literature databases for studies reporting NPs (Brain NP (BNP)/NT-pro-BNP) or troponin I/T in TTS and ACS, identifying 28 studies for troponin/NPs (5618 and 1145 patients, respectively). Results Troponin was significantly lower in TTS than ACS (standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.86; 95% CI, −1.08 to −0.64; p<0.00001), with an absolute difference of 75 times the upper limit of normal (×ULN) higher in ACS than TTS. Conversely, NPs were significantly higher in TTS (SMD 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.80; p<0.00001) and 5.8×ULN greater absolutely. Area under the curve (AUC) for troponin in ACS versus TTS was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.93), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.00) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction versus TTS. For NPs, AUC was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89). Combination of troponin and NPs with logistic regression did not improve AUC. Recursive Partitioning and Regression Tree analysis calculated a troponin threshold ≥26×ULN that identified 95% cases as ACS where and specificity for ACS were 85.71% and 53.57%, respectively, with 94.32% positive predictive value and 29.40% negative predictive value. Conclusions Troponin is lower and NPs higher in TTS versus ACS. Troponin had greater power than NPs at discriminating TTS and ACS, and with troponin ≥26×ULN patients are far more likely to have ACS. Data are available upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute heart failure syndrome which resembles acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at presentation. Differentiation requires coronary angiography, but where this does not occur immediately, cardiac biomarkers may provide additional utility. We performed a meta-analysis to compare troponin and natriuretic peptides (NPs) in TTS and ACS to determine if differences in biomarker profile can aid diagnosis. Methods We searched five literature databases for studies reporting NPs (Brain NP (BNP)/NT-pro-BNP) or troponin I/T in TTS and ACS, identifying 28 studies for troponin/NPs (5618 and 1145 patients, respectively). Results Troponin was significantly lower in TTS than ACS (standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.86; 95% CI, −1.08 to −0.64; p<0.00001), with an absolute difference of 75 times the upper limit of normal (×ULN) higher in ACS than TTS. Conversely, NPs were significantly higher in TTS (SMD 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.80; p<0.00001) and 5.8×ULN greater absolutely. Area under the curve (AUC) for troponin in ACS versus TTS was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.93), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.00) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction versus TTS. For NPs, AUC was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89). Combination of troponin and NPs with logistic regression did not improve AUC. Recursive Partitioning and Regression Tree analysis calculated a troponin threshold ≥26×ULN that identified 95% cases as ACS where and specificity for ACS were 85.71% and 53.57%, respectively, with 94.32% positive predictive value and 29.40% negative predictive value. Conclusions Troponin is lower and NPs higher in TTS versus ACS. Troponin had greater power than NPs at discriminating TTS and ACS, and with troponin ≥26×ULN patients are far more likely to have ACS. Data are available upon reasonable request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌钙蛋白和钠尿肽在塔克次氏综合征和急性冠状动脉综合征中的比较:一项荟萃分析
目标 高骤变综合征(TTS)是一种急性心力衰竭综合征,发病时与急性冠脉综合征(ACS)相似。鉴别时需要进行冠状动脉造影,但如果不能立即进行冠状动脉造影,心脏生物标记物可能会提供额外的帮助。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较了 TTS 和 ACS 中的肌钙蛋白和钠尿肽 (NPs),以确定生物标志物特征的差异是否有助于诊断。方法 我们在五个文献数据库中检索了报告 TTS 和 ACS 中 NPs(脑钠肽(BNP)/NT-pro-BNP)或肌钙蛋白 I/T 的研究,确定了 28 项肌钙蛋白/NPs 研究(分别有 5618 名和 1145 名患者)。结果 TTS 的肌钙蛋白明显低于 ACS(标准化平均差值 (SMD) -0.86;95% CI,-1.08 至 -0.64;P<0.00001),ACS 的绝对差值是正常值上限 (×ULN) 的 75 倍,高于 TTS。相反,TTS 的 NPs 明显更高(SMD 0.62;95% CI,0.44 至 0.80;p<0.00001),绝对值高出 5.8×ULN。肌钙蛋白在 ACS 与 TTS 之间的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.82(95% CI,0.70 至 0.93),在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死与 TTS 之间的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.92(95% CI,0.80 至 1.00)。对于 NPs,AUC 为 0.69(95% CI,0.48 至 0.89)。将肌钙蛋白和 NPs 与逻辑回归相结合并不能提高 AUC。递归分区和回归树分析计算出的肌钙蛋白阈值≥26×ULN可将95%的病例确定为ACS,其中ACS的特异性分别为85.71%和53.57%,阳性预测值为94.32%,阴性预测值为29.40%。结论 TTS 与 ACS 相比,肌钙蛋白更低,NPs 更高。肌钙蛋白对 TTS 和 ACS 的鉴别力高于 NPs,肌钙蛋白≥26×ULN 的患者患 ACS 的可能性更大。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Optimal timing of oral anticoagulation initiation in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review. Characterisation of patients who develop atrial fibrillation-induced cardiomyopathy. Partnering RemoTe monitoring of Implanted Cardiac devices with Intelligent PATient Engagement - PARTICIPATE trial: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Heart valve clinics: an expanding role for the clinical scientist's validation of a framework for competency and certification. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy due to truncating variants in myosin binding protein C: a Spanish cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1