First evidence of a biomarker-based dose-response relationship in chronic pain using physiological closed-loop spinal cord stimulation

Leah Muller, Jason Pope, Paul Verrills, Erika Petersen, Jan Willem Kallewaard, Ian Gould, Dean M Karantonis
{"title":"First evidence of a biomarker-based dose-response relationship in chronic pain using physiological closed-loop spinal cord stimulation","authors":"Leah Muller, Jason Pope, Paul Verrills, Erika Petersen, Jan Willem Kallewaard, Ian Gould, Dean M Karantonis","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives In spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy, electricity is the medication delivered to the spinal cord for pain relief. In contrast to conventional medication where dose is determined by desired therapeutic plasma concentration, there is lack of equivalent means of determining dose delivery in SCS. In open-loop (OL) SCS, due to the dynamic nature of the epidural space, the activating electric field delivered is inconsistent at the level of the dorsal columns. Recent Food and Drug Administration guidance suggests accurate and consistent therapy delivered using physiologic closed-loop control (PCLC) devices can minimize underdosage or overdosage and enhance medical care. PCLC-based evoked compound action potential (ECAP)-controlled technology provides the ability to prescribe a precise stimulation dose unique to each patient, continuously measure neural activation, and objectively inform SCS therapy optimization. Methods Neurophysiological indicator metrics of therapy dose, usage above neural activation threshold, and accuracy of SCS therapy were assessed for relationship with pain reduction in over 600 SCS patients. Results Significant relationships between objective metrics and pain relief across the patient population are shown, including first evidence for a dose-response relationship in SCS. Conclusions Higher dose, more time over ECAP threshold, and higher accuracy are associated with better outcomes across patients. There is potential to optimize individual patient outcomes based on unique objective measurable electrophysiological inputs. Data are available on reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives In spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy, electricity is the medication delivered to the spinal cord for pain relief. In contrast to conventional medication where dose is determined by desired therapeutic plasma concentration, there is lack of equivalent means of determining dose delivery in SCS. In open-loop (OL) SCS, due to the dynamic nature of the epidural space, the activating electric field delivered is inconsistent at the level of the dorsal columns. Recent Food and Drug Administration guidance suggests accurate and consistent therapy delivered using physiologic closed-loop control (PCLC) devices can minimize underdosage or overdosage and enhance medical care. PCLC-based evoked compound action potential (ECAP)-controlled technology provides the ability to prescribe a precise stimulation dose unique to each patient, continuously measure neural activation, and objectively inform SCS therapy optimization. Methods Neurophysiological indicator metrics of therapy dose, usage above neural activation threshold, and accuracy of SCS therapy were assessed for relationship with pain reduction in over 600 SCS patients. Results Significant relationships between objective metrics and pain relief across the patient population are shown, including first evidence for a dose-response relationship in SCS. Conclusions Higher dose, more time over ECAP threshold, and higher accuracy are associated with better outcomes across patients. There is potential to optimize individual patient outcomes based on unique objective measurable electrophysiological inputs. Data are available on reasonable request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用生理性闭环脊髓刺激,首次证明慢性疼痛中基于生物标志物的剂量-反应关系
背景和目的 在脊髓刺激(SCS)疗法中,电是输送到脊髓以缓解疼痛的药物。与传统药物根据预期治疗血浆浓度确定剂量不同,脊髓刺激疗法缺乏确定剂量的同等手段。在开环(OL)SCS 中,由于硬膜外腔的动态性质,在背柱水平上传递的激活电场并不一致。美国食品和药物管理局最近的指导意见表明,使用生理闭环控制(PCLC)设备提供准确一致的治疗,可以最大限度地减少剂量不足或过量的情况,并提高医疗护理水平。基于 PCLC 的诱发复合动作电位(ECAP)控制技术能够为每位患者开出独一无二的精确刺激剂量,持续测量神经激活情况,并客观地为 SCS 治疗优化提供信息。方法 评估了 600 多名 SCS 患者的治疗剂量、神经激活阈值以上的用量和 SCS 治疗准确性等神经生理学指标与疼痛减轻之间的关系。结果 在所有患者中,客观指标与疼痛缓解之间存在显著关系,其中包括 SCS 中剂量-反应关系的首个证据。结论 更高的剂量、超过 ECAP 阈值更多的时间和更高的准确性与患者更好的治疗效果相关。根据独特的客观可测量电生理输入,有可能优化患者的个体疗效。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks—a cadaveric study Multimodal analgesia and the erector spinae plane block in a rapid recovery pathway after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled study of practicality In reply: evaluating the efficacy of PENG and SIFICB in hip fracture analgesia – a critical analysis Invited reply letter: optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks – a cadaveric study Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcomes following pediatric bilateral lung and heart-lung transplantation: a retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1