Effect of Bricks-and-Mortar Architecture on Fracture Behavior of SiCp/Al Composite: A Finite Element Analysis

IF 2.3 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES Applied Composite Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s10443-024-10221-4
Xiang Gao, Xiaonan Lu, Xuexi Zhang, Mingfang Qian, Aibin Li, Huan Wang, Cheng Liu, Bowen Gong, Wenting Ouyang, Hua-Xin Peng
{"title":"Effect of Bricks-and-Mortar Architecture on Fracture Behavior of SiCp/Al Composite: A Finite Element Analysis","authors":"Xiang Gao, Xiaonan Lu, Xuexi Zhang, Mingfang Qian, Aibin Li, Huan Wang, Cheng Liu, Bowen Gong, Wenting Ouyang, Hua-Xin Peng","doi":"10.1007/s10443-024-10221-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The metal-matrix composites (MMCs) with biomimetic bricks-and-mortar architectures have been experimentally demonstrated to exhibit excellent strength-ductility match. Here, biomimetic bricks-and-mortar architecture mimicking masonry bonds was introduced in numerical models. By translating perpendicular layers on stack bond model, 1/2 running and running bond models were established. The results reveal that elongation of running bond model is the highest (4.77%), which is ∼ 1.5 times as that of stack type model. The strength of these models is similar (330 ± 1 MPa). However, it is the trade-off between load bearing capacity and fracture of SiC particles. In the stack bond model, over a small junction layer area led to a relatively straight crack path and thus lower elongation. On the contrary, running bond model shows a zigzag main crack. So, the main crack deflects frequently with high energy consumption. Furthermore, crack deflection into matrix cell increases propagation resistance, leading to the highest elongation in the running bond model. Therefore, the biomimetic bricks-and-mortar architecture delays and deflects main crack propagation. These findings have significant implication for the architecture design of advanced composite materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":468,"journal":{"name":"Applied Composite Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Composite Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-024-10221-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The metal-matrix composites (MMCs) with biomimetic bricks-and-mortar architectures have been experimentally demonstrated to exhibit excellent strength-ductility match. Here, biomimetic bricks-and-mortar architecture mimicking masonry bonds was introduced in numerical models. By translating perpendicular layers on stack bond model, 1/2 running and running bond models were established. The results reveal that elongation of running bond model is the highest (4.77%), which is ∼ 1.5 times as that of stack type model. The strength of these models is similar (330 ± 1 MPa). However, it is the trade-off between load bearing capacity and fracture of SiC particles. In the stack bond model, over a small junction layer area led to a relatively straight crack path and thus lower elongation. On the contrary, running bond model shows a zigzag main crack. So, the main crack deflects frequently with high energy consumption. Furthermore, crack deflection into matrix cell increases propagation resistance, leading to the highest elongation in the running bond model. Therefore, the biomimetic bricks-and-mortar architecture delays and deflects main crack propagation. These findings have significant implication for the architecture design of advanced composite materials.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
砖臼结构对 SiCp/Al 复合材料断裂行为的影响:有限元分析
实验证明,具有仿生砖-砂浆结构的金属基复合材料(MMC)具有优异的强度-电导率匹配性能。在此,我们在数值模型中引入了模拟砖石结构的仿生砖石结构。通过在叠层粘结模型上平移垂直层,建立了 1/2 运行和运行粘结模型。结果表明,流水粘结模型的伸长率最高(4.77%),是叠合模型的 1.5 倍。这些模型的强度相似(330 ± 1 兆帕)。然而,这需要在承载能力和碳化硅颗粒断裂之间做出权衡。在堆栈结合模型中,在较小的接合层面积上,裂纹路径相对较直,因此伸长率较低。相反,运行结合模型则显示出 "之 "字形主裂纹。因此,主裂纹偏转频繁,能量消耗高。此外,裂纹偏转到基质细胞中会增加传播阻力,从而导致运行粘结模型的伸长率最高。因此,仿生砖-砂浆结构延迟并偏转了主裂纹的扩展。这些发现对先进复合材料的结构设计具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Composite Materials
Applied Composite Materials 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Applied Composite Materials is an international journal dedicated to the publication of original full-length papers, review articles and short communications of the highest quality that advance the development and application of engineering composite materials. Its articles identify problems that limit the performance and reliability of the composite material and composite part; and propose solutions that lead to innovation in design and the successful exploitation and commercialization of composite materials across the widest spectrum of engineering uses. The main focus is on the quantitative descriptions of material systems and processing routes. Coverage includes management of time-dependent changes in microscopic and macroscopic structure and its exploitation from the material''s conception through to its eventual obsolescence.
期刊最新文献
A Review of Machine Learning for Progressive Damage Modelling of Fiber-Reinforced Composites Moisture Absorption Characterization and Mechanical Properties of CFRP Under the Combined Effects of Seawater and Continuous Bending Stress High-Biocontent Polymer Blends and Their Wood Plastic Composites: Blending, Compatibilization, and Their Recyclability Empirical Characterization and Modeling of Cohesive – to – Adhesive Shear Fracture Mode Transition due to Increased Adhesive Layer Thicknesses of Fiber Reinforced Composite Single – Lap Joints Unsupervised Machine Learning for Automatic Image Segmentation of Impact Damage in CFRP Composites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1