Chain of events analysis in diving accidents treated by the Royal Netherlands Navy 1966-2023.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Diving and hyperbaric medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-31 DOI:10.28920/dhm54.1.39-46
Benjamin L Turner, Pieter-Jan Am van Ooij, Thijs T Wingelaar, Rob A van Hulst, Edwin L Endert, Paul Clarijs, Rigo Hoencamp
{"title":"Chain of events analysis in diving accidents treated by the Royal Netherlands Navy 1966-2023.","authors":"Benjamin L Turner, Pieter-Jan Am van Ooij, Thijs T Wingelaar, Rob A van Hulst, Edwin L Endert, Paul Clarijs, Rigo Hoencamp","doi":"10.28920/dhm54.1.39-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diving injuries are influenced by a multitude of factors. Literature analysing the full chain of events in diving accidents influencing the occurrence of diving injuries is limited. A previously published 'chain of events analysis' (CEA) framework consists of five steps that may sequentially lead to a diving fatality. This study applied four of these steps to predominately non-lethal diving injuries and aims to determine the causes of diving injuries sustained by divers treated by the Diving Medical Centre of the Royal Netherlands Navy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was performed on diving injuries treated by the Diving Medical Centre between 1966 and 2023. Baseline characteristics and information pertinent to all four steps of the reduced CEA model were extracted and recorded in a database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 288 cases met the inclusion criteria. In 111 cases, all four steps of the CEA model could be applied. Predisposing factors were identified in 261 (90%) cases, triggers in 142 (49%), disabling agents in 195 (68%), and 228 (79%) contained a (possible-) disabling condition. The sustained diving injury led to a fatality in seven cases (2%). The most frequent predisposing factor was health conditions (58%). Exertion (19%), primary diver errors (18%), and faulty equipment (17%) were the most frequently identified triggers. The ascent was the most frequent disabling agent (52%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CEA framework was found to be a valuable tool in this analysis. Health factors present before diving were identified as the most frequent predisposing factors. Arterial gas emboli were the most lethal injury mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":11296,"journal":{"name":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","volume":"54 1","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm54.1.39-46","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diving injuries are influenced by a multitude of factors. Literature analysing the full chain of events in diving accidents influencing the occurrence of diving injuries is limited. A previously published 'chain of events analysis' (CEA) framework consists of five steps that may sequentially lead to a diving fatality. This study applied four of these steps to predominately non-lethal diving injuries and aims to determine the causes of diving injuries sustained by divers treated by the Diving Medical Centre of the Royal Netherlands Navy.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed on diving injuries treated by the Diving Medical Centre between 1966 and 2023. Baseline characteristics and information pertinent to all four steps of the reduced CEA model were extracted and recorded in a database.

Results: A total of 288 cases met the inclusion criteria. In 111 cases, all four steps of the CEA model could be applied. Predisposing factors were identified in 261 (90%) cases, triggers in 142 (49%), disabling agents in 195 (68%), and 228 (79%) contained a (possible-) disabling condition. The sustained diving injury led to a fatality in seven cases (2%). The most frequent predisposing factor was health conditions (58%). Exertion (19%), primary diver errors (18%), and faulty equipment (17%) were the most frequently identified triggers. The ascent was the most frequent disabling agent (52%).

Conclusions: The CEA framework was found to be a valuable tool in this analysis. Health factors present before diving were identified as the most frequent predisposing factors. Arterial gas emboli were the most lethal injury mechanism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1966-2023 年荷兰皇家海军处理的潜水事故的事件链分析。
导言:潜水伤害受多种因素影响。对潜水事故中影响潜水伤害发生的整个事件链进行分析的文献十分有限。之前发表的 "事件链分析"(CEA)框架包括五个步骤,这些步骤可能依次导致潜水死亡事故。本研究将其中四个步骤应用于非致命性潜水伤害,旨在确定荷兰皇家海军潜水医疗中心治疗的潜水员所受潜水伤害的原因:这项回顾性队列研究针对的是 1966 年至 2023 年期间在潜水医疗中心接受治疗的潜水受伤人员。研究提取了基线特征和简化 CEA 模型所有四个步骤的相关信息,并将其记录在数据库中:共有 288 个病例符合纳入标准。在 111 个病例中,CEA 模型的所有四个步骤均可应用。有 261 个病例(90%)确定了诱发因素,142 个病例(49%)确定了触发因素,195 个病例(68%)确定了致残因素,228 个病例(79%)确定了(可能的)致残条件。在 7 个案例(2%)中,持续的潜水伤害导致了死亡。最常见的诱发因素是健康状况(58%)。体力消耗(19%)、主要潜水员失误(18%)和设备故障(17%)是最常见的诱发因素。上升是最常见的致残因素(52%):结论:在本次分析中,CEA 框架被认为是一个有价值的工具。潜水前的健康因素是最常见的诱发因素。动脉气体栓塞是最致命的伤害机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
Diving and hyperbaric medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine (DHM) is the combined journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) and the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS). It seeks to publish papers of high quality on all aspects of diving and hyperbaric medicine of interest to diving medical professionals, physicians of all specialties, scientists, members of the diving and hyperbaric industries, and divers. Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, unless clearly authenticated copyright exemption accompaniesthe manuscript. All manuscripts will be subject to peer review. Accepted contributions will also be subject to editing.
期刊最新文献
Acoustic emission, an innovative diagnosis tool for therapeutic hyperbaric chambers: or how to requalify safely using pneumatic pressure test. Arterial dissection in scuba divers: a potential adverse manifestation of the physiological effects of immersion. Bispectral index with density spectral array (BIS-DSA) monitoring in a patient with inner ear and cerebral decompression sickness. Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation. Hyperbaric medicine and climate footprint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1