Safety and efficacy of givinostat in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (EPIDYS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

IF 46.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Lancet Neurology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00036-X
Eugenio Mercuri, Juan J Vilchez, Odile Boespflug-Tanguy, Craig M Zaidman, Jean K Mah, Nathalie Goemans, Wolfgang Müller-Felber, Erik H Niks, Ulrike Schara-Schmidt, Enrico Bertini, Giacomo P Comi, Katherine D Mathews, Laurent Servais, Krista Vandenborne, Jessika Johannsen, Sonia Messina, Stefan Spinty, Laura McAdam, Kathryn Selby, Barry Byrne, Chamindra G Laverty, Kevin Carroll, Giulia Zardi, Sara Cazzaniga, Nicoletta Coceani, Paolo Bettica, Craig M McDonald
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of givinostat in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (EPIDYS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.","authors":"Eugenio Mercuri, Juan J Vilchez, Odile Boespflug-Tanguy, Craig M Zaidman, Jean K Mah, Nathalie Goemans, Wolfgang Müller-Felber, Erik H Niks, Ulrike Schara-Schmidt, Enrico Bertini, Giacomo P Comi, Katherine D Mathews, Laurent Servais, Krista Vandenborne, Jessika Johannsen, Sonia Messina, Stefan Spinty, Laura McAdam, Kathryn Selby, Barry Byrne, Chamindra G Laverty, Kevin Carroll, Giulia Zardi, Sara Cazzaniga, Nicoletta Coceani, Paolo Bettica, Craig M McDonald","doi":"10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00036-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Duchenne muscular dystrophy, the most common childhood muscular dystrophy, is caused by dystrophin deficiency. Preclinical and phase 2 study data have suggested that givinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, might help to counteract the effects of this deficiency. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of givinostat in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 41 tertiary care sites in 11 countries. Eligible participants were ambulant, male, and aged at least 6 years, had a genetically confirmed diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, completed two four-stair climb assessments with a mean of 8 s or less (≤1 s variance), had a time-to-rise of at least 3 s but less than 10 s, and had received systemic corticosteroids for at least 6 months. Participating boys were randomly assigned (2:1, allocated according to a list generated by the interactive response technology provider) to receive either oral givinostat or matching placebo twice a day for 72 weeks, stratified by concomitant steroid use. Boys, investigators, and site and sponsor staff were masked to treatment assignment. The dose was flexible, based on weight, and was reduced if not tolerated. Boys were divided into two groups on the basis of their baseline vastus lateralis fat fraction (VLFF; measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy): group A comprised boys with a VLFF of more than 5% but no more than 30%, whereas group B comprised boys with a VLFF of 5% or less, or more than 30%. The primary endpoint compared the effects of givinostat and placebo on the change in results of the four-stair climb assessment between baseline and 72 weeks, in the intention-to-treat, group A population. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned boys who received at least one dose of study drug. When the first 50 boys in group A completed 12 months of treatment, an interim futility assessment was conducted, after which the sample size was adapted using masked data from the four-stair climb assessments. Furthermore, the starting dose of givinostat was reduced following a protocol amendment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02851797, and is complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between June 6, 2017, and Feb 22, 2022, 359 boys were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 179 were enrolled into the study (median age 9·8 years [IQR 8·1-11·0]), all of whom were randomly assigned (118 to receive givinostat and 61 to receive placebo); 170 (95%) boys completed the study. Of the 179 boys enrolled, 120 (67%) were in group A (81 givinostat and 39 placebo); of these, 114 (95%) completed the study. For participants in group A, comparing the results of the four-stair climb assessment at 72 weeks and baseline, the geometric least squares mean ratio was 1·27 (95% CI 1·17-1·37) for boys receiving givinostat and 1·48 (1·32-1·66) for those receiving placebo (ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·745-0·989; p=0·035). The most common adverse events in the givinostat group were diarrhoea (43 [36%] of 118 boys vs 11 [18%] of 61 receiving placebo) and vomiting (34 [29%] vs 8 [13%]); no treatment-related deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Among ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, results of the four-stair climb assessment worsened in both groups over the study period; however, the decline was significantly smaller with givinostat than with placebo. The dose of givinostat was reduced after an interim safety analysis, but no new safety signals were reported. An ongoing extension study is evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of givinostat in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Italfarmaco.</p>","PeriodicalId":17989,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Neurology","volume":"23 4","pages":"393-403"},"PeriodicalIF":46.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00036-X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy, the most common childhood muscular dystrophy, is caused by dystrophin deficiency. Preclinical and phase 2 study data have suggested that givinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, might help to counteract the effects of this deficiency. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of givinostat in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Methods: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 41 tertiary care sites in 11 countries. Eligible participants were ambulant, male, and aged at least 6 years, had a genetically confirmed diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, completed two four-stair climb assessments with a mean of 8 s or less (≤1 s variance), had a time-to-rise of at least 3 s but less than 10 s, and had received systemic corticosteroids for at least 6 months. Participating boys were randomly assigned (2:1, allocated according to a list generated by the interactive response technology provider) to receive either oral givinostat or matching placebo twice a day for 72 weeks, stratified by concomitant steroid use. Boys, investigators, and site and sponsor staff were masked to treatment assignment. The dose was flexible, based on weight, and was reduced if not tolerated. Boys were divided into two groups on the basis of their baseline vastus lateralis fat fraction (VLFF; measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy): group A comprised boys with a VLFF of more than 5% but no more than 30%, whereas group B comprised boys with a VLFF of 5% or less, or more than 30%. The primary endpoint compared the effects of givinostat and placebo on the change in results of the four-stair climb assessment between baseline and 72 weeks, in the intention-to-treat, group A population. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned boys who received at least one dose of study drug. When the first 50 boys in group A completed 12 months of treatment, an interim futility assessment was conducted, after which the sample size was adapted using masked data from the four-stair climb assessments. Furthermore, the starting dose of givinostat was reduced following a protocol amendment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02851797, and is complete.

Findings: Between June 6, 2017, and Feb 22, 2022, 359 boys were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 179 were enrolled into the study (median age 9·8 years [IQR 8·1-11·0]), all of whom were randomly assigned (118 to receive givinostat and 61 to receive placebo); 170 (95%) boys completed the study. Of the 179 boys enrolled, 120 (67%) were in group A (81 givinostat and 39 placebo); of these, 114 (95%) completed the study. For participants in group A, comparing the results of the four-stair climb assessment at 72 weeks and baseline, the geometric least squares mean ratio was 1·27 (95% CI 1·17-1·37) for boys receiving givinostat and 1·48 (1·32-1·66) for those receiving placebo (ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·745-0·989; p=0·035). The most common adverse events in the givinostat group were diarrhoea (43 [36%] of 118 boys vs 11 [18%] of 61 receiving placebo) and vomiting (34 [29%] vs 8 [13%]); no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Interpretation: Among ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, results of the four-stair climb assessment worsened in both groups over the study period; however, the decline was significantly smaller with givinostat than with placebo. The dose of givinostat was reduced after an interim safety analysis, but no new safety signals were reported. An ongoing extension study is evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of givinostat in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Funding: Italfarmaco.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吉维诺他对杜氏肌营养不良症男孩的安全性和疗效(EPIDYS):一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的第三阶段试验。
背景:杜兴氏肌营养不良症是最常见的儿童肌营养不良症,由肌营养不良蛋白缺乏症引起。临床前和二期研究数据表明,组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂吉维诺司他可能有助于抵消这种缺乏症的影响。我们旨在评估吉维诺司他治疗杜氏肌营养不良症的安全性和有效性:这项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3 期试验在 11 个国家的 41 个三级医疗机构进行。符合条件的参与者均为行动自如的男性,年龄至少6岁,经基因确诊患有杜氏肌营养不良症,完成两次四级爬楼评估的平均时间为8秒或更短(方差≤1秒),爬楼时间至少3秒但少于10秒,接受过至少6个月的系统性皮质类固醇治疗。参与研究的男孩被随机分配(2:1,根据交互式响应技术提供商生成的名单分配)到吉维诺司他口服液或匹配的安慰剂中,每天两次,持续 72 周,根据同时使用类固醇的情况进行分层。男孩、研究人员、研究机构和赞助商的工作人员均被蒙蔽,不知道治疗分配情况。治疗剂量根据体重灵活掌握,如果不能耐受,则减少剂量。根据男孩的基线侧阔肌脂肪率(VLFF,通过磁共振波谱测量)将其分为两组:A 组包括 VLFF 超过 5%、但不超过 30% 的男孩,而 B 组包括 VLFF 在 5%或以下、或超过 30% 的男孩。主要终点是比较吉维司他和安慰剂对意向治疗 A 组人群在基线和 72 周之间四楼攀爬评估结果变化的影响。对所有接受过至少一剂研究药物的随机分配男孩进行了安全性评估。当 A 组的前 50 名男孩完成 12 个月的治疗后,进行了中期无效性评估,之后利用四层爬楼梯评估的蒙蔽数据调整了样本量。此外,在修订方案后,吉维诺司他的起始剂量也有所减少。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02851797)上注册,并已完成:2017年6月6日至2022年2月22日期间,359名男孩接受了资格评估。其中179名男孩(中位年龄9-8岁[IQR 8-1-11-0])被纳入研究,所有男孩均被随机分配(118名男孩接受吉维司他治疗,61名男孩接受安慰剂治疗);170名男孩(95%)完成了研究。在注册的 179 名男孩中,120 人(67%)被分到 A 组(81 人接受吉维司他治疗,39 人接受安慰剂治疗);其中 114 人(95%)完成了研究。就A组参与者而言,比较72周时和基线时的四楼攀爬评估结果,接受吉维司他治疗的男孩的几何最小二乘法平均比值为1-27(95% CI 1-17-1-37),接受安慰剂治疗的男孩的几何最小二乘法平均比值为1-48(1-32-1-66)(比值比为0-86,95% CI 0-745-0-989;P=0-035)。吉维司他组最常见的不良反应是腹泻(118名男孩中有43名[36%],61名接受安慰剂的男孩中有11名[18%])和呕吐(34名[29%],8名[13%]);没有发生与治疗相关的死亡事件:在患有杜兴氏肌肉营养不良症的步行男孩中,两组的四楼攀爬评估结果在研究期间都有所恶化;但吉维诺司他的下降幅度明显小于安慰剂。经过中期安全性分析后,吉维诺他的剂量有所降低,但没有报告新的安全性信号。目前正在进行一项扩展研究,评估吉维诺他在杜氏肌营养不良症患者中的长期安全性和有效性:资金来源:Italfarmaco。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Neurology
Lancet Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
58.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
572
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Neurology is the world-leading clinical neurology journal. It publishes original research that advocates for change in, or sheds light on, neurological clinical practice. The topics covered include cerebrovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, epilepsy, migraine, neurological infections, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular disorders, peripheral nerve disorders, pediatric neurology, sleep disorders, and traumatic brain injury. The journal publishes a range of article types, including Articles (including randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses), Review, Rapid Review, Comment, Correspondence, and Personal View. It also publishes Series and Commissions that aim to shape and drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in areas of need in neurology. The Lancet Neurology is an internationally trusted source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge. It has an Impact Factor of 48.0, making it the top-ranked clinical neurology journal out of 212 journals worldwide.
期刊最新文献
On how a brain beholds beauty. Equitable access to levetiracetam for people with epilepsy. Evobrutinib in multiple sclerosis: challenges and unmet goals. Frailty for neurologists: perspectives on how frailty influences care planning. Learning to be an adult with a disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1