The association between decision and incision time by race and ethnicity.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Minerva obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05456-3
Rodney Bruno, Gianna Wilkie, Julianne Lauring
{"title":"The association between decision and incision time by race and ethnicity.","authors":"Rodney Bruno, Gianna Wilkie, Julianne Lauring","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05456-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying and reducing inequities in the delivery of care is crucial to improving health disparities in obstetric outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the effect of race and ethnicity on time from decision for cesarean delivery to incision following implementation of a case classification system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify women who had cesarean deliveries from October 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, at a single, tertiary care institution. Medical records were reviewed for demographics and cesarean delivery case classification. Case classification was divided into STAT cesarean delivery (within 10 minutes), level A (within 30 minutes), level B (within 60 minutes), or scheduled/unscheduled other. The \"decision to incision time\" was determined from the time the case surgical order was placed to the case start time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 565 eligible individuals who had a cesarean delivery during the study period, with 13.6% identifying as Black/African American, 29.0% as Hispanic/Latina, and 57.3% as White. Hispanic women were more likely to need interpreter services than other race/ethnicity groups. There was no statistically significant difference in \"decision to incision time\" by race/ethnicity. Within the total cohort, 51.8% of cesarean delivery cases went within the goal time according to case classification, which also did not differ by race/ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Race and ethnicity do not impact cesarean delivery \"decision to incision time\" or case classification. Only half of cesarean deliveries went within the goal time, so further evaluation to improve workflow and improve this metric for all patients is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"431-436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05456-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying and reducing inequities in the delivery of care is crucial to improving health disparities in obstetric outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the effect of race and ethnicity on time from decision for cesarean delivery to incision following implementation of a case classification system.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify women who had cesarean deliveries from October 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, at a single, tertiary care institution. Medical records were reviewed for demographics and cesarean delivery case classification. Case classification was divided into STAT cesarean delivery (within 10 minutes), level A (within 30 minutes), level B (within 60 minutes), or scheduled/unscheduled other. The "decision to incision time" was determined from the time the case surgical order was placed to the case start time.

Results: There were 565 eligible individuals who had a cesarean delivery during the study period, with 13.6% identifying as Black/African American, 29.0% as Hispanic/Latina, and 57.3% as White. Hispanic women were more likely to need interpreter services than other race/ethnicity groups. There was no statistically significant difference in "decision to incision time" by race/ethnicity. Within the total cohort, 51.8% of cesarean delivery cases went within the goal time according to case classification, which also did not differ by race/ethnicity.

Conclusions: Race and ethnicity do not impact cesarean delivery "decision to incision time" or case classification. Only half of cesarean deliveries went within the goal time, so further evaluation to improve workflow and improve this metric for all patients is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按种族和民族划分的决策与切口时间之间的关联。
背景:识别并减少医疗服务中的不平等对于改善产科结果中的健康差异至关重要。本研究旨在评估在实施病例分类系统后,种族和民族对从决定剖宫产到切口时间的影响:方法:研究人员进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定 2020 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日期间在一家三级医疗机构进行剖宫产的产妇。研究人员查阅了医疗记录,以了解人口统计学和剖宫产病例分类。病例分类分为 STAT 剖宫产(10 分钟内)、A 级(30 分钟内)、B 级(60 分钟内)或计划内/计划外其他。决定切开时间 "是指从下达手术指令到手术开始的时间:研究期间共有 565 名符合条件的剖宫产产妇,其中 13.6% 为黑人/非裔美国人,29.0% 为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,57.3% 为白人。与其他种族/族裔群体相比,西班牙裔妇女更有可能需要口译服务。在 "决定切口时间 "方面,不同种族/族裔的差异没有统计学意义。根据病例分类,51.8%的剖宫产病例在目标时间内完成,种族/族裔之间也没有差异:结论:种族和民族并不影响剖宫产的 "决定到切口时间 "或病例分类。只有一半的剖宫产手术在目标时间内完成,因此需要进一步评估以改进工作流程,并改善所有患者的这一指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
期刊最新文献
Use of the Knutson's paste for the treatment of perineal wound dehiscence after vaginal delivery: a single-center clinical experience. Endometriosis and risk factors in pregnancy, labor and delivery: a case-control study. Recipients' age, fresh embryo and blastocyst-stage embryo transfer as favorable factors in a transnational oocyte donation program. The role of colposcopy in HPV vaccination era. The predictive role of uterocervical angle in labor outcomes: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1