Minerva obstetrics and gynecology最新文献

Background: We seek to identify risk factors associated with abnormal umbilical artery cord gas (UACG).

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the multicenter Consortium for Safe Labor dataset. This study included singleton, term deliveries with UACG available. Abnormal UACG was defined as pH≤7.0 or base excess >12 mmol/L. Odds Ratios were calculated using a multivariable logistic regression to determine clinical factors associated with abnormal UACG.

Results: 18,589 patients met inclusion criteria, with approximately 2% having an abnormal UACG. Those with prior Cesarean delivery (OR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.15-1.93), maternal diabetes (OR=1.67, 95% CI: 1.06-2.64), magnesium sulfate use (OR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.25-2.60), current Cesarean delivery (OR=2.56, 95% CI: 2.06-3.19), pre-eclampsia/HELLP (hemolysis, elevate liver enzymes, low platelet count) syndrome (OR=2.80, 95% CI: 1.79-4.36), and placental abruption (OR=4.81, 95% CI: 3.35-6.91) had increased odds of having abnormal UACG at delivery compared to those without.

Conclusions: Diabetes, pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, and a history of prior Cesarean delivery were all associated with abnormal UACG in this cohort of singleton, term deliveries. These findings indicate that patients with pre-existing risk factors may be at an increased likelihood of adverse neonatal outcomes.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of caffeine on fetal heart rate (FHR) as determined by computerized cardiotocography (cCTG) parameters.

Methods: Term pregnancies that performed a fetal antepartum cCTG were included. Two physicians recorded coffee habits before the cCTG, and pregnant women were divided into two groups: the coffee group and the control group. Furthermore, cCTG' parameters were compared between the two groups.

Results: One hundred thirty-four pregnant women were enrolled. Based on maternal coffee habits, 82 pregnant women were allocated to the coffee group, while 52 were in the control group. The two groups shared similar demographic and obstetric characteristics. The mean daily coffee intake was 1.4±0.6 cups. Coffee group fetuses evidenced a lower FHR baseline, 135±9.9 bpm, versus the control group, 138±8.0 bpm, (P value = 0.03). Other cCTG parameters did not show statistical differences. Multivariate analysis demonstrated no confounding factors. A subanalysis that evaluated the daily amount of coffee consumed or the half-life of caffeine found no difference in cCTG measures.

Conclusions: Maternal caffeine consumption did not influence fetal cardiac reactivity after absorption.

Background: The most common cause of hyperandrogenism in women is polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the prevalence of which among women of reproductive age ranges from 8.0 to 21%. The clinical manifestations of PCOS are diverse, and the degree of metabolic and hormonal disorders depends on the PCOS phenotype. The non-classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (NCCAH) ranks second in the structure of diseases associated with hyperandrogenism. PCOS and NCCAH have a similar clinical picture and laboratory parameters, which requires differential diagnosis.

Methods: Urinary steroid profiles were studied by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Results: We revealed differences in glucocorticoid and androgen metabolism in women with different PCOS phenotypes, which is reflected in the clinical manifestation of the disease. It was evaluated the activity of enzymes involved in the metabolism of steroid hormones. In patients with NCCAH, it was found that polycystic ovarian changes are secondary and develop due to the presence of prolonged adrenal hyperandrogenism.

Conclusions: The results obtained are important for understanding the mechanisms of disorders in various variants of hyperandrogenism and determining further tactics for managing patients.

Background: Fetal aneuploidies, including trisomies 21, 13, and 18, represent a significant issue in prenatal care. The advent of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) through the detection of cell-free DNA (cf-DNA) in maternal blood has modified screening for chromosomal abnormalities. This study evaluates NIPT adherence among pregnant of different ethnicities, addressing potential disparities in prenatal care.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study conducted at a tertiary care university hospital in Italy between March 31, 2021, and September 30, 2022. Participants were categorized by ethnicity (Asian/Pacific islander, Black, Latina, White, Middle Eastern). Maternal demographic characteristics and prenatal test data were recorded. Comparative analyses were executed utilizing a One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Test, augmented by Tukey's honestly significant difference test for post-hoc evaluation. Statistical significance was denoted by a P value (P)<0.05. A multivariate analysis through a multinomial regression model was conducted for the results to detect potential bias.

Results: Six hundred seventeen pregnancies were included: 418 White, 105 Asian/Pacific islander, 46 Black, 40 Latina, and 8 Middle Eastern. Maternal age showed no significant variation. Black ethnicity had higher prepregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI; mean: 27.5 kg/m²±SD: 5.92, P=0.02), while Asian and White pregnancies had higher nulliparity rates (63.8% and 70.8%). Black ethnicity had no NIPT uptake (0.00%). Asian/Pacific islander and Latina pregnant had lower NIPT utilization (9.5% and 7.5%, P<0.001). White ethnicity had a higher NIPT rate (27.5%). In the NIPT group, 8.9% of White and 12.5% of Middle Eastern pregnancies chose cf-DNA without a prior first-trimester ultrasound test. Considering the first-trimester screening, 30.4% of Black pregnancies had nuchal translucency, while 17.4% combined it with beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) and associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A; P<0.001). White pregnancies had high adherence: 74.6% had nuchal translucency and 53.8% had a first-trimester combined test. Overall, 69.6% of Black pregnancies skipped both tests versus 16.5% in the White group (P<0.001).

Conclusions: Significant disparities in prenatal care and NIPT adherence were observed among pregnant women of diverse ethnic backgrounds. Lower cf-DNA adhesion and limited adherence to first-trimester screening were observed among any ethnicities. These findings highlight the critical need for targeted interventions and policies to reduce barriers and facilitate access to prenatal care for all women.

Introduction: Dysgerminoma is a histologic subtype of malignant ovarian germ cell tumor (MOGCT). Most publications describing dysgerminoma are of small cohorts. Large cohorts usually describe MOGCT as a group, and therefore, drawing specific conclusions regarding dysgerminomas is challenging. In this study, we sought to highlight and review the most recently published data on dysgerminoma.

Evidence acquisition: We performed an electronic search in PubMed, using a range of medical subject heading terms (MeSH), including English language articles only, published earliest in 2010. Papers including "germ cell tumors," and "dysgerminoma" were included. We excluded reviews, meta-analyses, and case reports. We followed the PRISMA guidelines to prepare this review. All included articles were reviewed by two reviewers (LF, GL).

Evidence synthesis: We found that dysgerminomas mostly present in an early stage of the disease and therefore harbor a favorable prognosis. Most dysgerminomas occur in women of reproductive age, in which fertility-sparing treatment is safe. While complete staging surgery for all patients is debatable, adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be beneficial. Long-term follow-up by a gynecologic oncologist is necessary as recurrence may occur.

Conclusions: Since most studies are small and retrospective, the development of multicenter prospective studies protocols is of utmost importance to study future lines of therapy.

Background: Although misoprostol has been used as a potential option for cervical priming prior to hysteroscopy, the available scientific evidence regarding its use is not always conclusive. The purpose of this article is to assess the different practices and criteria applied for the use of misoprostol use for cervical preparation in outpatient hysteroscopy without anesthesia among gynecologists across Spain, exploring the need for the corresponding evidence-based guidelines.

Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study in which a two-step approach survey was conducted. Firstly, an online pilot survey was conducted with a limited sample of 10 professionals from 10 centers to identify initial patterns and gather feedback. Subsequently, a comprehensive online survey was carried out over a larger sample of respondents. The comprehensive survey covered aspects of misoprostol usage, including dosage, timing, indications, safety concerns, and overall perception. The survey design allowed for a thorough examination of existing practices and provided valuable insights to help address the disparities noted in misoprostol use for cervical preparation in outpatient hysteroscopies.

Results: Through the comprehensive online survey, we received response of 102 gynecologists from 54 centers across Spain. The overall results show a considerable variation in misoprostol use prior to hysteroscopy, with 21.57% of respondents not using misoprostol in any case, while a substantial majority (78.43%) use it selectively (68.83%) or consistently (9.8%). When asked about the type of patients, the vast majority (72.55%) use it in postmenopausal nulliparous patients, while its was used considerably less in premenopausal nulliparous patients (35.29%), postmenopausal multiparous patients (22.55%), and premenopausal multiparous patients (3.92%), whereas some choose not to use it in any patients (26.47%). Furthermore, 89.22% of respondents felt that there is a lack of clear criteria on misoprostol use, while 79.41% believed that it is necessary to establish such criteria.

Conclusions: There was a diverse landscape of misoprostol use which underscores the complexity and individual approach to cervical preparation for an outpatient hysteroscopy. Indeed, the findings regarding its application, notably more prevalent among postmenopausal patients, contravene the prevailing body of published evidence. Moreover, a considerable proportion of respondents expressed the need for clear criteria, which emphasizes the importance of evidence-based protocols to guide the optimal use of misoprostol.

Background: Antenatal universal screening for toxoplasmosis is recommended in most affluent countries worldwide. Despite evidence is not robust, detected cases are typically treated during pregnancy. Affected newborns are also treated to temper clinical consequences. However, this established mode of management warrants careful and continuous re-evaluation. The epidemiology of the infection is changing and there is the need to monitor the clinical scenario.

Methods: This is an observational retrospective study conducted at a referral hospital in Northern Italy. Every woman referred from January 2011 to December 2021 for suspected toxoplasmosis in pregnancy was eligible. All women were managed according to a local standardized protocol. Clinical and laboratory findings were obtained from patients' charts.

Results: Out of 347 women referred, 191 (55%) were discharged as false positive at initial assessment. We identified 141 women with suspected infection and 15 with confirmed infection. The number of women treated with antibiotics was 136 (96%) and 15 (100%), respectively. A total of 118 amniocenteses were performed, all of which were negative. There were two spontaneous miscarriages and five therapeutic terminations of pregnancy (of whom four were consequent to parental concerns related to the toxoplasmic infection), all among suspected cases. Vertical transmission occurred in a single case, a patient with confirmed infection diagnosed by seroconversion at 28 weeks' gestation. The course of this pregnancy was uneventful, and the infant is healthy at 7 years follow-up. Overall, the incidence of vertical transmission was 7% (95% CI: 1-30%) in confirmed cases and 0% (95% CI: 0-0.2%) in suspected cases.

Conclusions: The current policy of universal screening and prompt management of toxoplasmosis infection is efficient. However, undue invasive procedures and terminations of pregnancy could occur. Future studies are warranted to improve clinical management.

Background: The mean wait time for new patient appointments has been growing across specialties, including obstetrics and gynecology, in recent years. This study aimed to assess the impact of insurance type (Medicaid versus commercial insurance) on new patient appointment wait times in general obstetrics and gynecology practices.

Methods: A cross-sectional study used covert mystery calls to general obstetrician gynecologists. Physicians were selected from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists directory and stratified by districts to ensure nationwide representation. Wait times for new patient appointments were collected and analyzed.

Results: Regardless of insurance type, the mean wait time for all obstetrician gynecologists was 29.9 business days. Medicaid patients experienced a marginally longer wait time of 4.8% (Ratio: 1.048). While no statistically significant difference in wait times based on insurance type was observed (P=0.39), the data revealed other impactful factors. Younger physicians and those in university-based practices had longer wait times. The gender of the physician also influenced wait times, with female physicians having a mean wait time of 34.7 days compared to 22.7 days for male physicians (P=0.03). Additionally, geographical variations were noted, with physicians in American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists District I (Atlantic Provinces, CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT) having the longest mean wait times and those in District III (DE, NJ, PA) the shortest.

Conclusions: While the type of insurance did not significantly influence the wait times for general obstetrics and gynecology appointments, physician demographic and geographic factors did.

Background: Bevacizumab-based chemotherapies are commonly administered in the treatment of patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The primary aim of this study was to assess the factors that predict the objective response to bevacizumab-based therapies in cases of advanced and recurrent EOC.

Methods: The retrospective data of 264 patients with EOC from the current study were collected between 2009 and 2022 at our clinic. Survival analyses were conducted utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the factors predicting the objective response.

Results: A predominant subset of patients (83%) presented with serous adenocarcinoma, exhibiting a high-grade differentiation at 87%. The vast majority (80%) of the cohort experienced disease recurrence. Three-fourths of the cases received bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, clinical factors such as a disease recurrence (P=0.031), upfront tumor debulking surgery before bevacizumab (P=0.009), doublet chemotherapy (P=0.003), and the presence of malignant pleural effusion (P=0.024) emerged as significant determinants influencing the Objective Response Rate (ORR) in patients undergoing bevacizumab-based therapy. The ORR was 67.5% (N.=178), comprising 15.2% complete responses (N.=40) and 52.1% partial responses (N.=138). The median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were estimated at 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.60-11.9) and 20.1 months (95% CI, 16.0-24.2), respectively.

Conclusions: The responses to bevacizumab-based chemotherapies could be predict by the presence of malignant pleural effusion, disease recurrence, upfront tumor debulking surgery and doublet regimen of chemotherapy.

Background: Stillbirth impacts 1% of all pregnancies in the USA with the underlying cause often remaining unknown. The objective of this study was to identify if prenatal aneuploidy screening impacted patient agreement to stillbirth evaluation.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with a singleton stillbirth after 20 weeks of gestation between October 2017 and December 2021. Demographics and stillbirth evaluation were collected for all patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed adjusting for variables that were significant in univariate analysis.

Results: A total of 81 persons experienced stillbirth during the study period. Approximately 59.3% of patients had prenatal aneuploidy screening: 39.5% integrated screening, 37.5% non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), and 22.9% quad screen. Prenatal genetic screening did not significantly impact patient agreement to placental pathology, serum laboratory evaluation, or fetal autopsy. Patients with NIPT were less likely to have genetic testing sent at the time of stillbirth compared to those with another aneuploidy screening (aOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.99).

Conclusions: Prenatal aneuploidy screening was not associated with patient acceptance of stillbirth evaluation. However, patients with NIPT were less likely to pursue further genetic testing during stillbirth evaluation, so further education regarding the benefit of karyotype and microarray should be included in patient counseling.