Effect of Different Doses of Sugammadex on Recovery and Hemodynamic Parameters in Reversing Neuromuscular Blockade in Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medeniyet medical journal Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2024.60052
Kadir Arslan, Gozde Kucuksarac, Hale Cetin Arslan, Erkan Aydin, Ayca Sultan Sahin
{"title":"Effect of Different Doses of Sugammadex on Recovery and Hemodynamic Parameters in Reversing Neuromuscular Blockade in Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy.","authors":"Kadir Arslan, Gozde Kucuksarac, Hale Cetin Arslan, Erkan Aydin, Ayca Sultan Sahin","doi":"10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2024.60052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the effect of different doses of sugammadex used in reversing neuromuscular blockade in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) procedures on patient recovery and hemodynamic measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anesthesia induction was performed using propofol (1 mg/kg) and rocuronium (0.4 mg/kg). Patients were classified into group 2 (2 mg/kg) and group 3 (3 mg/kg) according to the dose of sugammadex used to reverse neuromuscular blockade. The patient's spontaneous breathing time, eye-opening time, time to comply with voluntary commands, time to reach Modified Aldrete score (MAS) 9, complications, and hemodynamic data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 314 ECT sessions were performed on 46 patients. The average age of the patients was 38.3±12.6 years, and 56.6% (n=26) were male. While the average number of ECTs applied to the patients was 6.8±2.8, the average seizure duration was 28.2±12.7 seconds. The most common diagnosis (32.7%) in patients who underwent ECT was bipolar disorder. The average time to recovery of spontaneous breathing, eyeopening time, time to comply with voluntary commands, and time to reach MAS 9 were found to be significantly lower in group 3 (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.002, respectively). Tooth damage was observed in 0.3% (n=1) and tongue abrasion in 0.6% (n=2) of the cases. Hemodynamic measurements were similar between groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sugammadex used at a dose of 3 mg/kg in ECT procedures significantly reduces recovery times compared with 2 mg/kg. However, both doses can be safely and cost-effectively used to reverse the neuromuscular blockade provided by 0.4 mg/kg rocuronium.</p>","PeriodicalId":37427,"journal":{"name":"Medeniyet medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medeniyet medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2024.60052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the effect of different doses of sugammadex used in reversing neuromuscular blockade in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) procedures on patient recovery and hemodynamic measurements.

Methods: Anesthesia induction was performed using propofol (1 mg/kg) and rocuronium (0.4 mg/kg). Patients were classified into group 2 (2 mg/kg) and group 3 (3 mg/kg) according to the dose of sugammadex used to reverse neuromuscular blockade. The patient's spontaneous breathing time, eye-opening time, time to comply with voluntary commands, time to reach Modified Aldrete score (MAS) 9, complications, and hemodynamic data were analyzed.

Results: In total, 314 ECT sessions were performed on 46 patients. The average age of the patients was 38.3±12.6 years, and 56.6% (n=26) were male. While the average number of ECTs applied to the patients was 6.8±2.8, the average seizure duration was 28.2±12.7 seconds. The most common diagnosis (32.7%) in patients who underwent ECT was bipolar disorder. The average time to recovery of spontaneous breathing, eyeopening time, time to comply with voluntary commands, and time to reach MAS 9 were found to be significantly lower in group 3 (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.002, respectively). Tooth damage was observed in 0.3% (n=1) and tongue abrasion in 0.6% (n=2) of the cases. Hemodynamic measurements were similar between groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Sugammadex used at a dose of 3 mg/kg in ECT procedures significantly reduces recovery times compared with 2 mg/kg. However, both doses can be safely and cost-effectively used to reverse the neuromuscular blockade provided by 0.4 mg/kg rocuronium.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同剂量的舒加迈对逆转电休克疗法患者神经肌肉阻滞的恢复和血流动力学参数的影响
研究目的这项回顾性观察研究旨在探讨在电休克治疗(ECT)过程中逆转神经肌肉阻滞所使用的不同剂量的苏甘美对患者恢复和血液动力学测量的影响:使用丙泊酚(1 毫克/千克)和罗库洛铵(0.4 毫克/千克)进行麻醉诱导。根据用于逆转神经肌肉阻滞的苏甘美剂量,将患者分为第 2 组(2 毫克/千克)和第 3 组(3 毫克/千克)。对患者的自主呼吸时间、睁眼时间、遵从自主指令时间、达到改良阿尔德雷特评分(MAS)9分的时间、并发症和血液动力学数据进行了分析:46名患者共接受了314次电疗。患者平均年龄为(38.3±12.6)岁,56.6%(n=26)为男性。患者的平均电痉挛疗法次数为(6.8±2.8)次,平均发作持续时间为(28.2±12.7)秒。接受电痉挛疗法的患者最常见的诊断(32.7%)是躁郁症。研究发现,第3组患者恢复自主呼吸的平均时间、睁眼时间、遵从自主指令的时间以及达到MAS 9的时间均显著低于第3组(P0.05):结论:与 2 毫克/千克的剂量相比,在电痉挛治疗过程中使用 3 毫克/千克剂量的舒格迈司可显着缩短恢复时间。然而,两种剂量均可安全、经济地用于逆转 0.4 mg/kg 罗库溴铵所提供的神经肌肉阻滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medeniyet medical journal
Medeniyet medical journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medeniyet Medical Journal (Medeniyet Med J) is an open access, peer-reviewed, and scientific journal of Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine on various academic disciplines in medicine, which is published in English four times a year, in March, June, September, and December by a group of academics. Medeniyet Medical Journal is the continuation of Göztepe Medical Journal (ISSN: 1300-526X) which was started publishing in 1985. It changed the name as Medeniyet Medical Journal in 2015. Submission and publication are free of charge. No fees are asked from the authors for evaluation or publication process. All published articles are available online in the journal website (www.medeniyetmedicaljournal.org) without any fee. The journal publishes intradisciplinary or interdisciplinary clinical, experimental, and basic researches as well as original case reports, reviews, invited reviews, or letters to the editor, Being published since 1985, the Medeniyet Med J recognizes that the best science should lead to better lives based on the fact that the medicine should serve to the needs of society, and knowledge should transform society. The journal aims to address current issues at both national and international levels, start debates, and exert an influence on decision-makers all over the world by integrating science in everyday life. Medeniyet Med J is committed to serve the public and influence people’s lives in a positive way by making science widely accessible. Believing that the only goal is improving lives, and research has an impact on people’s lives, we select the best research papers in line with this goal.
期刊最新文献
Alpha B-crystallin Ameliorates Imbalance of Redox Homeostasis, Inflammation and Apoptosis in an Acute Lung Injury Model with Rats. Clinical Characteristics of Children with Acute Post-Streptococcal Glomerulonephritis and Re-Evaluation of Patients with Artificial Intelligence. Comparative Effects of Candesartan Versus Enalapril on Apelin, Visfatin, and Lipid Levels in Non-obese Hypertensive Patients. Head and Neck Paragangliomas: 16-year Single-center Experience and Mini Review on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-up. Response to the Commentary on "Clinical and Sonographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1