Partnership Dynamics of LGB People and Heterosexuals: Patterns of First Partnership Formation and First Cohabitation.

Jeanette Bohr, Andrea Lengerer
{"title":"Partnership Dynamics of LGB People and Heterosexuals: Patterns of First Partnership Formation and First Cohabitation.","authors":"Jeanette Bohr, Andrea Lengerer","doi":"10.1007/s10680-024-09697-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study we examine partnership dynamics among people with different sexual orientations in Germany. More specifically, we explore the process of first partnership formation and first cohabitation among men and women who self-identify as heterosexual, homosexual or bisexual. Given the various discriminations against same-sex lifestyles, and the limited opportunities to meet potential partners, we assume that lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people form partnerships later in life and less frequently than heterosexuals. We further expect that the constantly improving social and legal climate for sexual minorities will lead to a reduction in differences in partnership behaviour by sexual orientation. We use retrospectively reported partnership biographies from the German Socio-Economic Panel, which was supplemented in 2019 with a boost sample of sexual and gender minority households. Using discrete-time event history models, we analyse nearly 15,000 episodes of being single and nearly 20,000 episodes of living without a partner in the household. Around 4.5% of these episodes are from people who self-identify as LGB. The results clearly show that patterns of partnership and coresidential union formation differ by sexual orientation. People with a homosexual orientation-and to a lesser extent people with a bisexual orientation-are less likely to enter into a first partnership and a first cohabitation than people with a heterosexual orientation. Significant changes occur across cohorts: LGB people from younger birth cohorts enter (cohabiting) partnerships much earlier and more frequently than those from older cohorts. Thus, the union formation patterns of LGB and straight people have converged slightly.</p>","PeriodicalId":51496,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Population-Revue Europeenne De Demographie","volume":"40 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Population-Revue Europeenne De Demographie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-024-09697-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study we examine partnership dynamics among people with different sexual orientations in Germany. More specifically, we explore the process of first partnership formation and first cohabitation among men and women who self-identify as heterosexual, homosexual or bisexual. Given the various discriminations against same-sex lifestyles, and the limited opportunities to meet potential partners, we assume that lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people form partnerships later in life and less frequently than heterosexuals. We further expect that the constantly improving social and legal climate for sexual minorities will lead to a reduction in differences in partnership behaviour by sexual orientation. We use retrospectively reported partnership biographies from the German Socio-Economic Panel, which was supplemented in 2019 with a boost sample of sexual and gender minority households. Using discrete-time event history models, we analyse nearly 15,000 episodes of being single and nearly 20,000 episodes of living without a partner in the household. Around 4.5% of these episodes are from people who self-identify as LGB. The results clearly show that patterns of partnership and coresidential union formation differ by sexual orientation. People with a homosexual orientation-and to a lesser extent people with a bisexual orientation-are less likely to enter into a first partnership and a first cohabitation than people with a heterosexual orientation. Significant changes occur across cohorts: LGB people from younger birth cohorts enter (cohabiting) partnerships much earlier and more frequently than those from older cohorts. Thus, the union formation patterns of LGB and straight people have converged slightly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者与异性恋的伴侣关系动态:首次建立伴侣关系和首次同居的模式。
在这项研究中,我们考察了德国不同性取向人群的伴侣关系动态。更具体地说,我们探讨了自我认同为异性恋、同性恋或双性恋的男性和女性首次建立伴侣关系和首次同居的过程。鉴于对同性生活方式的各种歧视,以及与潜在伴侣见面的机会有限,我们假定女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋(LGB)者在生活中建立伴侣关系的时间比异性恋者晚,频率也比异性恋者低。我们还预计,针对性少数群体的社会和法律环境的不断改善将导致按性取向划分的伴侣行为差异缩小。我们使用了德国社会经济小组回顾性报告的伴侣关系传记,并在 2019 年补充了性少数群体和性别少数群体家庭的增量样本。利用离散时间事件历史模型,我们分析了近 1.5 万次单身生活和近 2 万次无伴侣家庭生活。其中约 4.5%来自自我认同为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者的人。研究结果清楚地表明,不同性取向的人建立伴侣关系和同居关系的模式各不相同。与异性恋取向者相比,同性恋取向者--其次是双性恋取向者--首次建立伴侣关系和首次同居的可能性较低。不同出生组群之间也发生了重大变化:较年轻出生组群中的男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者比较年长组群中的男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者更早和更频繁地建立(同居)伴侣关系。因此,男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者的结合模式略有趋同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: European Journal of Population addresses a broad public of researchers, policy makers and others concerned with population processes and their consequences. Its aim is to improve understanding of population phenomena by giving priority to work that contributes to the development of theory and method, and that spans the boundaries between demography and such disciplines as sociology, anthropology, economics, geography, history, political science, epidemiology and other sciences contributing to public health. The Journal is open to authors from all over the world, and its articles cover European and non-European countries (specifically including developing countries) alike.
期刊最新文献
Flexible Working Arrangements and Fertility Intentions: A Survey Experiment in Singapore. The Urban Bias in Latin American Avoidable Mortality. First Union Formation in Italy: The Role of Micro- and Macro-Level Economic Conditions. Residential Mobility in Childhood and Union Dissolution Later in Life. Does Ethnicity Moderate the Union Dissolution Penalty for Women? A Register-based Analysis of Changes in Income Components.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1