Experiences and perspectives of colorectal cancer survivors and general practitioners on the delivery of survivorship care in general practice: a mixed methods study.

Bora Kim, Kate White, Marguerite Tracy, Janani Mahadeva, Julie Marker, Cheri Ostroff, Louise Acret, Simon Willcock, Claudia Rutherford
{"title":"Experiences and perspectives of colorectal cancer survivors and general practitioners on the delivery of survivorship care in general practice: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Bora Kim, Kate White, Marguerite Tracy, Janani Mahadeva, Julie Marker, Cheri Ostroff, Louise Acret, Simon Willcock, Claudia Rutherford","doi":"10.1071/PY23140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience ongoing sequelae from their cancer treatment. Limited evidence exists regarding how CRC survivors and general practitioners (GPs) manage these sequelae in the community. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of CRC survivors and GPs on current approaches to monitoring and managing sequelae of CRC treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study using cross-sectional national surveys and qualitative interviews with CRC survivors and GPs to explore: (1) treatment sequelae experienced by CRC survivors, (2) how these were monitored and managed by general practitioners, and (3) suggestions to improve ongoing management of the treatment sequelae. Survey responses were reported descriptively. Qualitative data were thematically analysed using an interpretive descriptive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy participants completed surveys: 51 CRC survivors and 19 GPs, and four interviews were conducted with GPs. CRC survivors experienced a range of treatment sequelae, but often did not discuss these with their GPs (experienced vs discussed: 86% vs 47% for fatigue/lack of energy, 78% vs 27% for psychological/emotional concern, 63% vs 22% for impaired sleep, 69% vs 29% for weight loss/gain, 59% vs 16% for sexual and intimacy concerns). GPs reported inadequate information transfer from cancer services and workload as major barriers to optimal care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>System-level changes that facilitate adequate information transfer from cancer services to GPs upon CRC treatment completion, as well as addressing time constraint issues essential for comprehensive monitoring and management of CRC treatment sequelae, could enhance the care of CRC survivors in the community setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience ongoing sequelae from their cancer treatment. Limited evidence exists regarding how CRC survivors and general practitioners (GPs) manage these sequelae in the community. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of CRC survivors and GPs on current approaches to monitoring and managing sequelae of CRC treatment.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study using cross-sectional national surveys and qualitative interviews with CRC survivors and GPs to explore: (1) treatment sequelae experienced by CRC survivors, (2) how these were monitored and managed by general practitioners, and (3) suggestions to improve ongoing management of the treatment sequelae. Survey responses were reported descriptively. Qualitative data were thematically analysed using an interpretive descriptive approach.

Results: Seventy participants completed surveys: 51 CRC survivors and 19 GPs, and four interviews were conducted with GPs. CRC survivors experienced a range of treatment sequelae, but often did not discuss these with their GPs (experienced vs discussed: 86% vs 47% for fatigue/lack of energy, 78% vs 27% for psychological/emotional concern, 63% vs 22% for impaired sleep, 69% vs 29% for weight loss/gain, 59% vs 16% for sexual and intimacy concerns). GPs reported inadequate information transfer from cancer services and workload as major barriers to optimal care.

Conclusions: System-level changes that facilitate adequate information transfer from cancer services to GPs upon CRC treatment completion, as well as addressing time constraint issues essential for comprehensive monitoring and management of CRC treatment sequelae, could enhance the care of CRC survivors in the community setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠癌幸存者和全科医生对全科医生提供幸存者护理的经验和观点:一项混合方法研究。
背景:许多结肠直肠癌 (CRC) 幸存者在接受癌症治疗后会不断出现后遗症。有关 CRC 幸存者和全科医生(GPs)如何在社区处理这些后遗症的证据有限。本研究旨在探讨 CRC 幸存者和全科医生在当前监测和管理 CRC 治疗后遗症的方法方面的经验和观点:我们采用横断面全国调查和定性访谈的混合方法对 CRC 幸存者和全科医生进行了研究,以探讨:(1) CRC 幸存者经历的治疗后遗症,(2) 全科医生如何监控和管理这些后遗症,以及 (3) 改善治疗后遗症持续管理的建议。调查回复以描述性方式报告。采用解释性描述方法对定性数据进行专题分析:70 名参与者填写了调查问卷:51 名 CRC 幸存者和 19 名全科医生,并对全科医生进行了四次访谈。CRC 幸存者经历了一系列治疗后遗症,但通常不会与他们的全科医生讨论这些后遗症(经历过与讨论过的比例:86% vs 47%):86%的幸存者与 47% 的幸存者讨论过疲劳/乏力问题,78% 的幸存者与 27% 的幸存者讨论过心理/情绪问题,63% 的幸存者与 22% 的幸存者讨论过睡眠障碍问题,69% 的幸存者与 29% 的幸存者讨论过体重减轻/增加问题,59% 的幸存者与 16% 的幸存者讨论过性和亲密关系问题)。全科医生表示,癌症服务信息传递不足和工作量大是影响最佳护理的主要障碍:结论:在系统层面进行改革,促进癌症服务机构在 CRC 治疗结束后向全科医生充分传递信息,并解决全面监测和管理 CRC 治疗后遗症所必需的时间限制问题,可加强社区环境中对 CRC 幸存者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Views of nurses and midwives working in primary healthcare services on intimate partner violence against women. The perspectives of people living with dementia and their carers on the role of the general practice nurse in dementia care provision: a qualitative study. Attitudes towards models of abortion care in sexual and reproductive health: perspectives of Australian health professionals. Investigating behaviours and attitudes regarding recommended vaccination in adults 50 years and above in Australia. Providing a localised cervical cancer screening course for general practice nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1