Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Program in Reducing Regional Hospitalization Rates for Patients With Diabetes-Related Foot Complications.

Ali Manji, Reza Basiri, Francois Harton, Kenton Rommens, Karim Manji
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Program in Reducing Regional Hospitalization Rates for Patients With Diabetes-Related Foot Complications.","authors":"Ali Manji, Reza Basiri, Francois Harton, Kenton Rommens, Karim Manji","doi":"10.1177/15347346241238458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the toe and flow model (TFM), a limb preservation program led by podiatric surgeons in Alberta, Canada, for its impact on hospitalization rates and length of stay (LOS) in patients with diabetic foot complication (DFC). Diabetes, a leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations (LEAs) in Canada, often results in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), a major cause of infection, amputation, and hospitalization. TFM has reportedly reduced amputation rates by 39% to 56%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study analyzed Alberta's health database from 2007 to 2017, focusing on diabetes patients aged 20 and above. It included patients with various DFCs and compared outcomes in regions using TFM and standard of care (SOC). The study also examined data from two major cities, one with TFM and the other without, including rural referrals to Calgary and Edmonton. The data were normalized for the diabetic population and analyzed using a standard Student's <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TFM regions showed significantly lower hospitalization rates (<i>p</i> = 1.22E-12) than SOC regions. Over 11 years, TFM maintained lower average and median LOS by 0.13 and 0.26 days, respectively. TFM access reduced hospitalization risk by up to 30%, and patients in TFM regions had a 21% shorter LOS compared to SOC regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite similar demographics and healthcare systems, the TFM region benefited from a dedicated multidisciplinary program and comprehensive limb preservation services. The study shows that TFM effectively reduces hospitalizations and LOS for DFCs, with significantly better outcomes in the TFM region than in SOC regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346241238458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the toe and flow model (TFM), a limb preservation program led by podiatric surgeons in Alberta, Canada, for its impact on hospitalization rates and length of stay (LOS) in patients with diabetic foot complication (DFC). Diabetes, a leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations (LEAs) in Canada, often results in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), a major cause of infection, amputation, and hospitalization. TFM has reportedly reduced amputation rates by 39% to 56%.

Methods: The study analyzed Alberta's health database from 2007 to 2017, focusing on diabetes patients aged 20 and above. It included patients with various DFCs and compared outcomes in regions using TFM and standard of care (SOC). The study also examined data from two major cities, one with TFM and the other without, including rural referrals to Calgary and Edmonton. The data were normalized for the diabetic population and analyzed using a standard Student's t-test.

Results: TFM regions showed significantly lower hospitalization rates (p = 1.22E-12) than SOC regions. Over 11 years, TFM maintained lower average and median LOS by 0.13 and 0.26 days, respectively. TFM access reduced hospitalization risk by up to 30%, and patients in TFM regions had a 21% shorter LOS compared to SOC regions.

Conclusion: Despite similar demographics and healthcare systems, the TFM region benefited from a dedicated multidisciplinary program and comprehensive limb preservation services. The study shows that TFM effectively reduces hospitalizations and LOS for DFCs, with significantly better outcomes in the TFM region than in SOC regions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多学科肢体保护计划在降低糖尿病足并发症患者地区住院率方面的效果。
研究目的这项研究评估了由加拿大阿尔伯塔省足病外科医生领导的 "足趾与足流模式"(TFM)肢体保护项目对糖尿病足并发症(DFC)患者住院率和住院时间(LOS)的影响。糖尿病是加拿大非外伤性下肢截肢(LEAs)的主要原因,通常会导致糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs),这是感染、截肢和住院的主要原因。据报道,TFM 可将截肢率降低 39% 至 56%:研究分析了艾伯塔省 2007 年至 2017 年的健康数据库,重点关注 20 岁及以上的糖尿病患者。研究纳入了各种 DFC 患者,并比较了使用 TFM 和标准护理(SOC)的地区的治疗效果。研究还检查了两个主要城市的数据,一个城市采用了TFM,另一个城市没有采用,包括卡尔加里和埃德蒙顿的农村转诊。数据根据糖尿病人群进行了归一化处理,并使用标准的学生 t 检验进行分析:TFM地区的住院率(p = 1.22E-12)明显低于SOC地区。11 年来,TFM 地区的平均住院日和中位住院日分别降低了 0.13 天和 0.26 天。TFM地区的住院风险降低了30%,与SOC地区相比,TFM地区患者的住院时间缩短了21%:尽管人口结构和医疗系统相似,TFM 地区仍受益于专门的多学科项目和全面的肢体保护服务。研究结果表明,TFM 有效减少了肢体缺损患者的住院时间和 LOS,TFM 地区的疗效明显优于 SOC 地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing. Analysis of Genetic Risk Factors Associated with Charcot Foot Based on the FinnGen Study R9 Data: A Wide-angle Mendelian Randomization Study. Manifestations of Endocrine Disease in the Lower Extremities: Beyond the Diabetic Foot. Evolving Strategies in the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers. Early Tissue Resection Versus Watchful Waiting After Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1