Comparison between the KARVI scale and the Child Development Evaluation test (EDI) as a screening tool for suspected neurodevelopmental delay.

Carolina Tovar-Moreno, Miguel A Karlis-Rangel, Susana A Villarreal-Guerra, Fernanda P García-Ayón, Jesús Santos-Guzmán, Belinda Carrión-Chavarría
{"title":"Comparison between the KARVI scale and the Child Development Evaluation test (EDI) as a screening tool for suspected neurodevelopmental delay.","authors":"Carolina Tovar-Moreno, Miguel A Karlis-Rangel, Susana A Villarreal-Guerra, Fernanda P García-Ayón, Jesús Santos-Guzmán, Belinda Carrión-Chavarría","doi":"10.24875/BMHIM.23000062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of suspected neurodevelopmental delay allows for timely diagnosis and appropriate intervention, for which numerous screening tests have been developed. However, most are complex and impractical for health-care workers at the community level. This study aimed to validate the KARVI scale in the neurodevelopment assessment of children under 1 year of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational, longitudinal, comparative, inferential, and prospective study. Healthy children without risk factors for developing neurodevelopmental delay from 0 to 12 months of age were evaluated remotely using the Zoom<sup>®</sup> application. The Child Development Evaluation Test and the KARVI scale were applied once a month for four consecutive months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty individuals were analyzed, with a predominance of males in 52%. Adequate percentages for a screening test were obtained in the first evaluation with a sensitivity of 70% (confidence interval [CI] 95% 34.75-93.33) and a specificity of 75% (CI 95% 58.8-87.31), and in the fourth evaluation with a sensitivity of 100% (CI 95% 29.4-100) and a specificity of 78.72% (CI 95% 64.34-89.3), being significant in both evaluations (p = 0.007 and p = 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The KARVI scale has the elements to be an effective screening test for suspected neurodevelopmental delay, but more extensive studies are needed to obtain more reliable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9103,"journal":{"name":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","volume":"81 1","pages":"36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.23000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection of suspected neurodevelopmental delay allows for timely diagnosis and appropriate intervention, for which numerous screening tests have been developed. However, most are complex and impractical for health-care workers at the community level. This study aimed to validate the KARVI scale in the neurodevelopment assessment of children under 1 year of age.

Methods: We conducted an observational, longitudinal, comparative, inferential, and prospective study. Healthy children without risk factors for developing neurodevelopmental delay from 0 to 12 months of age were evaluated remotely using the Zoom® application. The Child Development Evaluation Test and the KARVI scale were applied once a month for four consecutive months.

Results: Fifty individuals were analyzed, with a predominance of males in 52%. Adequate percentages for a screening test were obtained in the first evaluation with a sensitivity of 70% (confidence interval [CI] 95% 34.75-93.33) and a specificity of 75% (CI 95% 58.8-87.31), and in the fourth evaluation with a sensitivity of 100% (CI 95% 29.4-100) and a specificity of 78.72% (CI 95% 64.34-89.3), being significant in both evaluations (p = 0.007 and p = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions: The KARVI scale has the elements to be an effective screening test for suspected neurodevelopmental delay, but more extensive studies are needed to obtain more reliable results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将 KARVI 量表与儿童发育评估测试 (EDI) 作为筛查疑似神经发育迟缓的工具进行比较。
背景:及早发现疑似神经发育迟缓的儿童,可以及时诊断并采取适当的干预措施。然而,大多数筛查方法都很复杂,对于社区医护人员来说并不实用。本研究旨在验证 KARVI 量表在 1 岁以下儿童神经发育评估中的有效性:我们进行了一项观察性、纵向、比较、推论和前瞻性研究。我们使用 Zoom® 应用程序对 0 至 12 个月大无神经发育迟缓风险因素的健康儿童进行了远程评估。连续四个月,每月进行一次儿童发育评估测试和 KARVI 量表:对 50 名儿童进行了分析,其中男性占 52%。第一次评估的灵敏度为 70%(置信区间 [CI] 95% 34.75-93.33),特异度为 75%(置信区间 95% 58.8-87.31);第四次评估的灵敏度为 100%(置信区间 95% 29.4-100),特异度为 78.72%(置信区间 95% 64.34-89.3):KARVI量表具有有效筛查疑似神经发育迟缓的要素,但要获得更可靠的结果,还需要进行更广泛的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México is a bimonthly publication edited by the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. It receives unpublished manuscripts, in English or Spanish, relating to paediatrics in the following areas: biomedicine, clinical, public health, clinical epidemology, health education and clinical ethics. Articles can be original research articles, in-depth or systematic reviews, clinical cases, clinical-pathological cases, articles about public health, letters to the editor or editorials (by invitation).
期刊最新文献
Acknowledgments to reviewers 2023. Analysis of the changes in the management of preterm newborns born in a Spanish third-level hospital in the past 10 years. Changes in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit statistics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Comparison between the KARVI scale and the Child Development Evaluation test (EDI) as a screening tool for suspected neurodevelopmental delay. Dietary patterns of Sonoran breastfeeding women are associated to exclusive or partial breastfeeding regimes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1