The Association Between Prenatal Food Insecurity and Breastfeeding Initiation and Exclusive Breastfeeding Duration: A Longitudinal Study Using Oregon PRAMS and PRAMS-2, 2008-2015.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breastfeeding Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1089/bfm.2023.0126
Dane A De Silva, Elaine A Anderson, Jinhee Kim, Mei-Ling Ting Lee, Marie E Thoma
{"title":"The Association Between Prenatal Food Insecurity and Breastfeeding Initiation and Exclusive Breastfeeding Duration: A Longitudinal Study Using Oregon PRAMS and PRAMS-2, 2008-2015.","authors":"Dane A De Silva, Elaine A Anderson, Jinhee Kim, Mei-Ling Ting Lee, Marie E Thoma","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2023.0126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> In the United States, 11.1% of households experience food insecurity; however, pregnant women are disproportionately affected. Maternal food insecurity may affect infant feeding practices, for example, through being a source of chronic stress that may alter the decision to initiate and continue breastfeeding. Thus, we sought to determine whether prenatal food insecurity was associated with breastfeeding (versus not) and exclusive breastfeeding duration among Oregon women. <b><i>Method:</i></b> The Oregon Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data of live births from 2008 to 2015 and the Oregon PRAMS-2 follow-up survey were used (<i>n</i> = 3,624) in this study. Associations with breastfeeding initiation and duration were modeled with multivariable logistic regression and accelerated failure time (AFT), respectively. Models were adjusted for maternal sociodemographic and pre-pregnancy health characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nearly 10% of women experienced prenatal food insecurity. For breastfeeding initiation, unadjusted models suggested non-significant decreased odds (odds ratio (OR) 0.88 [confidence intervals (CI): 0.39, 1.99]), whereas adjusted models revealed a non-significant increased odds (OR 1.41 [CI: 0.58, 3.47]). Unadjusted AFT models suggested that food-insecure mothers had a non-significant decrease in exclusive breastfeeding duration (OR 0.76 [CI: 0.50, 1.17]), but adjustment for covariates attenuated results (OR 0.89 [CI: 0.57, 1.39]). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Findings suggest minimal differences in breastfeeding practices when exploring food security status in the prenatal period, though the persistence of food insecurity may affect exclusive breastfeeding duration. Lower breastfeeding initiation may be due to other explanatory factors correlated with food insecurity and breastfeeding, such as education and marital status.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2023.0126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the United States, 11.1% of households experience food insecurity; however, pregnant women are disproportionately affected. Maternal food insecurity may affect infant feeding practices, for example, through being a source of chronic stress that may alter the decision to initiate and continue breastfeeding. Thus, we sought to determine whether prenatal food insecurity was associated with breastfeeding (versus not) and exclusive breastfeeding duration among Oregon women. Method: The Oregon Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data of live births from 2008 to 2015 and the Oregon PRAMS-2 follow-up survey were used (n = 3,624) in this study. Associations with breastfeeding initiation and duration were modeled with multivariable logistic regression and accelerated failure time (AFT), respectively. Models were adjusted for maternal sociodemographic and pre-pregnancy health characteristics. Results: Nearly 10% of women experienced prenatal food insecurity. For breastfeeding initiation, unadjusted models suggested non-significant decreased odds (odds ratio (OR) 0.88 [confidence intervals (CI): 0.39, 1.99]), whereas adjusted models revealed a non-significant increased odds (OR 1.41 [CI: 0.58, 3.47]). Unadjusted AFT models suggested that food-insecure mothers had a non-significant decrease in exclusive breastfeeding duration (OR 0.76 [CI: 0.50, 1.17]), but adjustment for covariates attenuated results (OR 0.89 [CI: 0.57, 1.39]). Conclusions: Findings suggest minimal differences in breastfeeding practices when exploring food security status in the prenatal period, though the persistence of food insecurity may affect exclusive breastfeeding duration. Lower breastfeeding initiation may be due to other explanatory factors correlated with food insecurity and breastfeeding, such as education and marital status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产前食物不安全与母乳喂养启动和纯母乳喂养持续时间之间的关系:2008-2015 年俄勒冈州 PRAMS 和 PRAMS-2 纵向研究。
背景:在美国,11.1% 的家庭面临粮食不安全问题;然而,孕妇受到的影响尤为严重。孕产妇的食物不安全可能会影响婴儿的喂养方式,例如,孕产妇的长期压力可能会改变开始和继续母乳喂养的决定。因此,我们试图确定产前粮食不安全与俄勒冈州妇女母乳喂养(或不喂养)和纯母乳喂养持续时间是否相关。研究方法本研究使用了俄勒冈州妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)2008 年至 2015 年的活产数据和俄勒冈州 PRAMS-2 跟踪调查数据(n = 3624)。分别采用多变量逻辑回归和加速失败时间(AFT)对母乳喂养的开始时间和持续时间进行建模。模型根据产妇的社会人口学特征和孕前健康特征进行了调整。结果近 10%的妇女在产前经历过食物不安全。就母乳喂养而言,未经调整的模型显示几率下降不明显(几率比(OR)0.88 [置信区间(CI):0.39,1.99]),而调整后的模型显示几率上升不明显(OR 1.41 [CI:0.58,3.47])。未经调整的 AFT 模型显示,粮食不安全母亲的纯母乳喂养持续时间下降不明显(OR 0.76 [CI: 0.50, 1.17]),但根据协变量进行调整后,结果有所减弱(OR 0.89 [CI: 0.57, 1.39])。结论:研究结果表明,尽管持续的食物不安全可能会影响纯母乳喂养的持续时间,但在探讨产前的食物安全状况时,母乳喂养方式的差异很小。母乳喂养开始率较低的原因可能是与粮食不安全和母乳喂养相关的其他解释因素,如教育和婚姻状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Breastfeeding Experiences of Mothers of Children with Down Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. Factors Associated with Inequities in Donor Milk Bank Access Among Different Hospitals. Factors Associated with Weaning in Infants with Cow's Milk Allergy: A Cohort Study. Oral Care Performed with Breast Milk in Preterm Newborns Fed by Tube: A Randomized Controlled Study. The Interaction of Race and Pregnancy Intentions on Breastfeeding Initiation Rates and Duration in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1