Neck muscle spasticity in patients with disorder of consciousness: a pilot study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08176-0
Valeria Pingue, Marta Mirando, Benedetta Cazzulani, Gianluca Bellaviti, Filippo Saporiti, Cristina Zanga, Antonio Nardone
{"title":"Neck muscle spasticity in patients with disorder of consciousness: a pilot study.","authors":"Valeria Pingue, Marta Mirando, Benedetta Cazzulani, Gianluca Bellaviti, Filippo Saporiti, Cristina Zanga, Antonio Nardone","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08176-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disorder of consciousness (DOC) is a state of prolonged altered consciousness due to severe acquired brain injury (ABI). DOC can be differentiated into coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), or minimally conscious state (MCS) depending on the behavioral features observed and their relationship to the level of consciousness. Spasticity is one of the most frequently reported medical comorbidities in DOC patients. Since there is a critical lack of spasticity-focused studies and, in turn, of target treatment, we designed this pilot prospective study to evaluate cervical spine muscle spasticity and its effect on rehabilitation outcome in a large cohort of patients followed from the post-acute phase to 6 months after severe ABI.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate neck muscle spasticity and investigate its impact on neurological and functional outcome in a large cohort of adult patients with DOC followed from post-acute to 6 months after severe ABI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center prospective pilot study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Highly specialized inpatient neurorehabilitation clinic.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Patients with severe ABI admitted within 3 months after the acute event to our Neurorehabilitation Unit between May 21<sup>st</sup>, 2019 and April 23<sup>rd</sup>, 2020 for treatment of DOC as a part of their rehabilitation program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center prospective pilot study demographic data, etiology of ABI (traumatic versus non-traumatic), DOC evaluated with the revised Coma Recovery Scale (CRS-R), and neurological and functional outcome assessed respectively with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were considered. During cervical examination, we assessed spasticity with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), deviation of head alignment with a goniometer, and pain with the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 48 patients, 41.7% were diagnosed with UWS and 58.3% were in a minimally conscious state (MCS). We found spasticity of neck muscles in 91.7% of patients, with no difference in severity (assessed with MAS) between UWV and MCS. The NCS-R score at cervical spine examination was lower in UWS than MCS. Spasticity was severer in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to non-traumatic. At multiple linear regression analysis, younger age, hemisyndrome, and tetraparesis were independent predictors of severity of neck muscle spasticity in MCS. More severe spasticity was a predictor of worse neurological and functional outcome at discharge in UWS patients, independently of the other confounding variables at admission (e.g., age, severity of brain injury, functional assessment, and pain).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spasticity of neck muscles frequently develops in patients with DOC and is more severe in those after TBI. UWV and MCS have different spasticity profiles as regards risk factors and neurological and functional outcome. Severity of neck muscle spasticity in UWV patients may represent an early indicator of worse neurological and functional outcome after inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>Our findings could prompt clinicians to redefine the rehabilitation aims regarding spasticity and to estimate the functional outcome in patients undergoing intensive rehabilitation after severe ABI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08176-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disorder of consciousness (DOC) is a state of prolonged altered consciousness due to severe acquired brain injury (ABI). DOC can be differentiated into coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), or minimally conscious state (MCS) depending on the behavioral features observed and their relationship to the level of consciousness. Spasticity is one of the most frequently reported medical comorbidities in DOC patients. Since there is a critical lack of spasticity-focused studies and, in turn, of target treatment, we designed this pilot prospective study to evaluate cervical spine muscle spasticity and its effect on rehabilitation outcome in a large cohort of patients followed from the post-acute phase to 6 months after severe ABI.

Aim: To evaluate neck muscle spasticity and investigate its impact on neurological and functional outcome in a large cohort of adult patients with DOC followed from post-acute to 6 months after severe ABI.

Design: Single-center prospective pilot study.

Setting: Highly specialized inpatient neurorehabilitation clinic.

Population: Patients with severe ABI admitted within 3 months after the acute event to our Neurorehabilitation Unit between May 21st, 2019 and April 23rd, 2020 for treatment of DOC as a part of their rehabilitation program.

Methods: In this single-center prospective pilot study demographic data, etiology of ABI (traumatic versus non-traumatic), DOC evaluated with the revised Coma Recovery Scale (CRS-R), and neurological and functional outcome assessed respectively with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were considered. During cervical examination, we assessed spasticity with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), deviation of head alignment with a goniometer, and pain with the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R).

Results: Of the 48 patients, 41.7% were diagnosed with UWS and 58.3% were in a minimally conscious state (MCS). We found spasticity of neck muscles in 91.7% of patients, with no difference in severity (assessed with MAS) between UWV and MCS. The NCS-R score at cervical spine examination was lower in UWS than MCS. Spasticity was severer in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to non-traumatic. At multiple linear regression analysis, younger age, hemisyndrome, and tetraparesis were independent predictors of severity of neck muscle spasticity in MCS. More severe spasticity was a predictor of worse neurological and functional outcome at discharge in UWS patients, independently of the other confounding variables at admission (e.g., age, severity of brain injury, functional assessment, and pain).

Conclusions: Spasticity of neck muscles frequently develops in patients with DOC and is more severe in those after TBI. UWV and MCS have different spasticity profiles as regards risk factors and neurological and functional outcome. Severity of neck muscle spasticity in UWV patients may represent an early indicator of worse neurological and functional outcome after inpatient rehabilitation.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: Our findings could prompt clinicians to redefine the rehabilitation aims regarding spasticity and to estimate the functional outcome in patients undergoing intensive rehabilitation after severe ABI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意识障碍患者的颈部肌肉痉挛:一项试点研究。
背景:意识障碍(DOC)是一种因严重后天性脑损伤(ABI)导致的长时间意识改变状态。根据观察到的行为特征及其与意识水平的关系,意识障碍可分为昏迷、无反应清醒综合征(UWS)或微意识状态(MCS)。痉挛是 DOC 患者最常见的并发症之一。由于严重缺乏以痉挛为重点的研究,因此我们设计了这项试验性前瞻性研究,以评估颈椎肌肉痉挛及其对康复结果的影响,研究对象是严重脑损伤后急性期至6个月的大批患者:单中心前瞻性试验研究:地点:高度专业化的住院神经康复诊所:人群:2019 年 5 月 21 日至 2020 年 4 月 23 日期间,急性事件发生后 3 个月内入住本院神经康复科的严重 ABI 患者,治疗 DOC 作为其康复计划的一部分:在这项单中心前瞻性试点研究中,我们考虑了人口统计学数据、ABI病因(创伤性与非创伤性)、使用修订版昏迷恢复量表(CRS-R)评估的DOC,以及分别使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和功能独立性量表(FIM)评估的神经和功能结果。在颈椎检查过程中,我们使用改良阿什沃斯量表(MAS)评估痉挛情况,使用动态关节角度计评估头部排列偏差,使用痛觉昏迷量表-修订版(NCS-R)评估疼痛情况:在 48 名患者中,41.7% 被诊断为 UWS,58.3% 处于微意识状态(MCS)。我们在 91.7% 的患者中发现了颈部肌肉痉挛,但 UWV 和 MCS 的严重程度(以 MAS 评估)并无差异。颈椎检查时的 NCS-R 评分在 UWS 中低于 MCS。与非创伤性相比,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的痉挛更为严重。在多元线性回归分析中,年龄较小、半身不遂和四肢瘫痪是预测多发性硬化症患者颈部肌肉痉挛严重程度的独立因素。更严重的痉挛是UTS患者出院时神经和功能预后更差的预测因素,与入院时的其他混杂变量(如年龄、脑损伤严重程度、功能评估和疼痛)无关:结论:颈部肌肉痉挛经常发生在 DOC 患者身上,在创伤性脑损伤后的患者中更为严重。就风险因素、神经和功能结果而言,UWV 和 MCS 具有不同的痉挛特征。UWV患者颈部肌肉痉挛的严重程度可能是住院康复后神经和功能预后恶化的早期指标:我们的研究结果可促使临床医生重新定义痉挛方面的康复目标,并对严重缺血性脑损伤后接受强化康复治疗的患者的功能预后进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
期刊最新文献
Analysis and relationship between the volume of upper limb lymphoedema and pressure pain threshold, neural range of motion, pain intensity, kinesiophobia, pain hypervigilance and catastrophizing in breast cancer survivors. Long-term life expectancy in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Randomized controlled trials as a source of evidence in rehabilitation: a critical analysis. Efficacy and tolerability of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with plantar fasciopathy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Is the Silfverskiöld Test a valid tool for evaluating calf muscles spastic overactivity in patients with stroke? A retrospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1