DEFINITIONS AND ASSESSMENTS OF PAIN WITH IMPACT IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SCOPING REVIEW

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100659
Bruna Alves Hatakeyama , Mariana Nascimento Leite , G. Lorimer Moseley , Christopher M Williams , Steven J Kamper , Tiê P Yamato
{"title":"DEFINITIONS AND ASSESSMENTS OF PAIN WITH IMPACT IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SCOPING REVIEW","authors":"Bruna Alves Hatakeyama ,&nbsp;Mariana Nascimento Leite ,&nbsp;G. Lorimer Moseley ,&nbsp;Christopher M Williams ,&nbsp;Steven J Kamper ,&nbsp;Tiê P Yamato","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is growing recognition that a substantial proportion of children and adolescents are challenged by pain. However, there are inconsistencies as to how pain is defined. There is no consensus on what constitutes pain with sufficient impact to warrant concern for a child or adolescent.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the descriptors used to define pain with impact on children and adolescents.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We considered studies on pain in children and adolescents of school age (6 to 19 years). The definitions of pain with impact in children and adolescents were descriptively reported. To analyze the structure of the pain definitions, we grouped the definitions according to the impact of pain and based on 4 main domains: (1) presence of physical complaint, (2) impact of physical complaint, (3) temporal characteristic of the physical complaint, and (4) association with secondary disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Searches identified a total of 52,731 records and based on our inclusion criteria, 436 articles were included in this scoping review. Of these, 352 studies proposed to assess pain as a primary outcome but did not provide information on how pain was defined. In these studies, the most reported painful condition was “chronic pain,” with symptoms over 3 months, and the most used measurement instrument was the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Eighty-four studies assessed the impact of pain and provided a definition. For the description of 'symptoms', the most used terms were “pain” or “discomfort”, but few studies mentioned “impact”, the most used terms being “not being able to participate in daily activities” and “functional disability”. The most used assessment instrument was the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most studies did not propose a detailed definition and there is no standardization of the terms used even to search for the same concept. The lack of consensus on a definition of pain with impact in children and adolescents makes it difficult to compare the findings.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Although many studies include in their primary data the investigation of pain with impact, there is a lack of descriptions regarding the 'impact' of the condition in children and adolescents. Although the most used tools for assessing pain with impact have been the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), these tools are quantitative and may not capture the complexity of the pain or its potential impact on the patient's life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100659"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524000704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is growing recognition that a substantial proportion of children and adolescents are challenged by pain. However, there are inconsistencies as to how pain is defined. There is no consensus on what constitutes pain with sufficient impact to warrant concern for a child or adolescent.

Objectives

The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the descriptors used to define pain with impact on children and adolescents.

Methods

We considered studies on pain in children and adolescents of school age (6 to 19 years). The definitions of pain with impact in children and adolescents were descriptively reported. To analyze the structure of the pain definitions, we grouped the definitions according to the impact of pain and based on 4 main domains: (1) presence of physical complaint, (2) impact of physical complaint, (3) temporal characteristic of the physical complaint, and (4) association with secondary disorders.

Results

Searches identified a total of 52,731 records and based on our inclusion criteria, 436 articles were included in this scoping review. Of these, 352 studies proposed to assess pain as a primary outcome but did not provide information on how pain was defined. In these studies, the most reported painful condition was “chronic pain,” with symptoms over 3 months, and the most used measurement instrument was the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Eighty-four studies assessed the impact of pain and provided a definition. For the description of 'symptoms', the most used terms were “pain” or “discomfort”, but few studies mentioned “impact”, the most used terms being “not being able to participate in daily activities” and “functional disability”. The most used assessment instrument was the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).

Conclusion

Most studies did not propose a detailed definition and there is no standardization of the terms used even to search for the same concept. The lack of consensus on a definition of pain with impact in children and adolescents makes it difficult to compare the findings.

Implications

Although many studies include in their primary data the investigation of pain with impact, there is a lack of descriptions regarding the 'impact' of the condition in children and adolescents. Although the most used tools for assessing pain with impact have been the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), these tools are quantitative and may not capture the complexity of the pain or its potential impact on the patient's life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和青少年影响性疼痛的定义和评估:范围审查
背景越来越多的人认识到,相当一部分儿童和青少年面临着疼痛的挑战。然而,对疼痛的定义并不一致。本范围综述旨在概述用于定义对儿童和青少年有影响的疼痛的描述。我们对儿童和青少年受影响疼痛的定义进行了描述性报告。为了分析疼痛定义的结构,我们根据疼痛的影响以及 4 个主要领域对疼痛定义进行了分组:(1) 身体不适的存在,(2) 身体不适的影响,(3) 身体不适的时间特征,以及 (4) 与继发性疾病的关联。其中,352 项研究提出将疼痛作为主要结果进行评估,但未提供有关如何定义疼痛的信息。在这些研究中,报告最多的疼痛情况是症状超过 3 个月的 "慢性疼痛",使用最多的测量工具是数值评定量表 (NRS)。有 84 项研究评估了疼痛的影响并给出了定义。对于 "症状 "的描述,使用最多的术语是 "疼痛 "或 "不适",但很少有研究提到 "影响",使用最多的术语是 "无法参与日常活动 "和 "功能性残疾"。结论 大多数研究都没有提出详细的定义,甚至在搜索同一概念时使用的术语也没有标准化。虽然许多研究在其主要数据中包含了对有影响的疼痛的调查,但缺乏对儿童和青少年有影响的疼痛的 "影响 "的描述。虽然评估疼痛影响最常用的工具是数字评分量表(NRS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS),但这些工具都是定量的,可能无法反映疼痛的复杂性或对患者生活的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
期刊最新文献
The experiences of physical therapists delivering a very low energy diet and exercise intervention for weight loss in people with knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative study “If by exercising I can conceive; I would like to exercise”. Exploring knowledge, perception, and practices about exercise among women with infertility: A qualitative study A Brazilian Association of Women´s Health Physical Therapy (ABRAFISM) guideline on the terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and assessment Reply to letter to editor for article: ‘‘Development, reliability, and validity of the mobility assessment scale in hospitalized patients (HMob).’’ Pain revolution in the public health system: Active coping strategies for chronic pain unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1