It is essential to accurately assess distress and pain in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU); however, few instruments have had their measurement properties tested for the Brazilian population.
Objective
To analyze the intra- and inter-examiner reliability, internal consistency, and responsiveness of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) scale in Brazilian neonates.
Methods
This is a methodological study conducted in the NICU. Neonates with a gestational age of 24–42 weeks who were not under the effect of muscle block or analgesia at the time of evaluation were included. Inter-examiner reliability was assessed at bedside by two trained evaluators who independently assessed the neonates at bedside and in real time using the PIPP-R. Procedures were filmed and used for intra-examiner reliability assessment after 10–14 days. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to determine intra- and inter-examiner reliability. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the total scores before and after painful procedures using a paired t-test, followed by an effect size analysis.
Results
A total of 119 assessments were performed on 15 neonates. The PIPP-R demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-examiner reliability (ICC > 0.9), and successfully detected changes after an acute painful procedure (p = 0.003; effect size = 0.8).
Conclusion
Excellent intra- and inter-examiner reliability, and sensitivity to changes over time were observed by using the PIPP-R at bedside, indicating that this is a suitable instrument for clinical use.
{"title":"Measurement properties of the Premature i=Infant Pain Profile-Revised applied at the bedside by physical therapists in the NICU","authors":"Amanda dos Santos Erhardt , Mariana Bueno , Taís Beppler Martins , Natalia Alves Menegol , Dayane Montemezzo , Luciana Sayuri Sanada","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2026.101576","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2026.101576","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It is essential to accurately assess distress and pain in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU); however, few instruments have had their measurement properties tested for the Brazilian population.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze the intra- and inter-examiner reliability, internal consistency, and responsiveness of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) scale in Brazilian neonates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a methodological study conducted in the NICU. Neonates with a gestational age of 24–42 weeks who were not under the effect of muscle block or analgesia at the time of evaluation were included. Inter-examiner reliability was assessed at bedside by two trained evaluators who independently assessed the neonates at bedside and in real time using the PIPP-R. Procedures were filmed and used for intra-examiner reliability assessment after 10–14 days. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to determine intra- and inter-examiner reliability. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the total scores before and after painful procedures using a paired <em>t</em>-test, followed by an effect size analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 119 assessments were performed on 15 neonates. The PIPP-R demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-examiner reliability (ICC > 0.9), and successfully detected changes after an acute painful procedure (<em>p</em> = 0.003; effect size = 0.8).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Excellent intra- and inter-examiner reliability, and sensitivity to changes over time were observed by using the PIPP-R at bedside, indicating that this is a suitable instrument for clinical use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101576"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2026.101579
Layla Maciel dos Santos , Regina Brena de Lima Costa , Thamyres D’Avila Monteiro Rodrigues , Ana Beatriz Chaves Vasconcelos Batista , Maria Carolina Traina Gama , Edson Silva Soares , Regis Radaelli , Cíntia Ehlers Botton
Background
Muscle power declines earlier and more sharply than strength with aging, yet it is not included in sarcopenia diagnosis, partly due to limitations in assessment methods.
Objective
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of vertical jump performance, measured via a mobile app, for sarcopenia screening and compare its accuracy with established strength tests.
Methods
This cross-sectional study included 214 older adults (mean age 70.6, range 60–88 year; 84.6% women) without mobility limitations. Sarcopenia was defined using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) algorithm (low muscle strength and mass). Jump height was measured using an app, and power was estimated using a validated equation. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results
Sarcopenia prevalence was 4.7%, and probable sarcopenia was 12.1%. Jump height showed 50% sensitivity, 92.5% specificity, and an AUC of 0.7349. Jump power demonstrated higher discriminative ability (90% sensitivity, 82.1% specificity, AUC 0.9146), comparable to handgrip strength (90% sensitivity, 93.6% specificity, AUC 0.8824). The FTCS test showed lower accuracy when based on time (88.9% sensitivity, 45.1% specificity, AUC 0.701), while power estimation improved performance to diagnosis (77.8% sensitivity, 80.9% specificity, AUC 0.8489).
Conclusion
Vertical jump power showed high sensitivity and specificity for sarcopenia screening, suggesting its potential as a sarcopenia tool. However, among the tests evaluated, the handgrip appears to be the most accurate and most effective, because it can be applied to older adults with restricted mobility in their lower limbs.
{"title":"Is lower limb muscle power by vertical jump a sensitive and specific measure for screening sarcopenia compared to handgrip strength and chair stand test?","authors":"Layla Maciel dos Santos , Regina Brena de Lima Costa , Thamyres D’Avila Monteiro Rodrigues , Ana Beatriz Chaves Vasconcelos Batista , Maria Carolina Traina Gama , Edson Silva Soares , Regis Radaelli , Cíntia Ehlers Botton","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2026.101579","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2026.101579","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Muscle power declines earlier and more sharply than strength with aging, yet it is not included in sarcopenia diagnosis, partly due to limitations in assessment methods.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of vertical jump performance, measured via a mobile app, for sarcopenia screening and compare its accuracy with established strength tests.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study included 214 older adults (mean age 70.6, range 60–88 year; 84.6% women) without mobility limitations. Sarcopenia was defined using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) algorithm (low muscle strength and mass). Jump height was measured using an app, and power was estimated using a validated equation. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sarcopenia prevalence was 4.7%, and probable sarcopenia was 12.1%. Jump height showed 50% sensitivity, 92.5% specificity, and an AUC of 0.7349. Jump power demonstrated higher discriminative ability (90% sensitivity, 82.1% specificity, AUC 0.9146), comparable to handgrip strength (90% sensitivity, 93.6% specificity, AUC 0.8824). The FTCS test showed lower accuracy when based on time (88.9% sensitivity, 45.1% specificity, AUC 0.701), while power estimation improved performance to diagnosis (77.8% sensitivity, 80.9% specificity, AUC 0.8489).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Vertical jump power showed high sensitivity and specificity for sarcopenia screening, suggesting its potential as a sarcopenia tool. However, among the tests evaluated, the handgrip appears to be the most accurate and most effective, because it can be applied to older adults with restricted mobility in their lower limbs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-26DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101567
Luciana de Lima Sousa , Paloma Boni de Lima , Thais Ribas Konrad Ribeiro , Mariana de Grande dos Santos , Patrícia Azevedo Garcia
Introduction
Sarcopenia, characterized by the progressive loss of muscle mass and function, is exacerbated in older adults with cardiovascular diseases. In hospitalized older adults, quick and practical questionnaires such as the SARC-F and SARCCalF are important for early risk screening and help guide effective interventions.
Objective
To identify the prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenia risk, and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the SARC-F and SARCCalF questionnaires in screening for probable and confirmed sarcopenia.
Methods
Cross-sectional study with older adults admitted to the emergency department of a public hospital for cardiovascular diseases between January and September 2023. Sarcopenia was assessed based on muscle strength (handgrip dynamometry), muscle mass (calf circumference), and physical performance (gait speed). The risk of sarcopenia was estimated using the SARC-F and SARCCalF questionnaires. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests and ROC curves.
Results
In a sample of 160 participants, the prevalence of sarcopenia was 21.3%. The SARCCalF identified 42.5 % of older adults at risk and the SARC-F 32.5 %. The SARCCalF demonstrated greater accuracy in identifying confirmed sarcopenia (AUC=0.85 [95%CI: 0.79, 0.91]) and low muscle strength (AUC=0.71 [95%CI: 0.62, 0.79]) when compared to the SARC-F.
Conclusion
The prevalence of sarcopenia was lower than expected in the study population. The SARCCalF was better able to identify older adults at risk of sarcopenia and demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy than the SARC-F in detecting probable and confirmed sarcopenia, standing out as a more effective screening tool for this population.
{"title":"Analysis of SARC-F and SARCCalF accuracy in assessing sarcopenia risk on older adults with cardiovascular diseases admitted to a referral hospital: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Luciana de Lima Sousa , Paloma Boni de Lima , Thais Ribas Konrad Ribeiro , Mariana de Grande dos Santos , Patrícia Azevedo Garcia","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101567","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101567","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Sarcopenia, characterized by the progressive loss of muscle mass and function, is exacerbated in older adults with cardiovascular diseases. In hospitalized older adults, quick and practical questionnaires such as the SARC-F and SARC<img>CalF are important for early risk screening and help guide effective interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify the prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenia risk, and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the SARC-F and SARC<img>CalF questionnaires in screening for probable and confirmed sarcopenia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional study with older adults admitted to the emergency department of a public hospital for cardiovascular diseases between January and September 2023. Sarcopenia was assessed based on muscle strength (handgrip dynamometry), muscle mass (calf circumference), and physical performance (gait speed). The risk of sarcopenia was estimated using the SARC-F and SARC<img>CalF questionnaires. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests and ROC curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In a sample of 160 participants, the prevalence of sarcopenia was 21.3%. The SARC<img>CalF identified 42.5 % of older adults at risk and the SARC-F 32.5 %. The SARC<img>CalF demonstrated greater accuracy in identifying confirmed sarcopenia (AUC=0.85 [95%CI: 0.79, 0.91]) and low muscle strength (AUC=0.71 [95%CI: 0.62, 0.79]) when compared to the SARC-F.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The prevalence of sarcopenia was lower than expected in the study population. The SARC<img>CalF was better able to identify older adults at risk of sarcopenia and demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy than the SARC-F in detecting probable and confirmed sarcopenia, standing out as a more effective screening tool for this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145841608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-25DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101568
Mark A. Kaizik , Aron S. Downie , Mark J. Hancock , Robert D. Herbert
Background: The DiTA database indexes primary studies and systematic reviews of the accuracy of diagnostic tests related to physical therapy; however, its usability has not been previously assessed.
Objective: (i) To assess the usability (layout, navigation, functionality, content) of DiTA
for typical users working within physical therapy; (ii) to report the volume of user interaction with DiTA.
Methods: A Think Aloud usability testing protocol was employed with 25 participants during screenshare teleconference interviews while performing DiTA search tasks. Participants then completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) online. Participants’ comments and interpretations from transcribed interviews were coded into four usability categories. Anonymous data on website user behaviour since DiTA’s inception were collected. The main outcome measures were frequency of comments per category with interpretations made during interviews, and SUS usability scores.
Results: Participants most often commented about content (49 % of total), typically with positive sentiment. Participants also frequently commented on DiTA’s functionality typically with negative sentiment. Misinterpretations during search tasks were commonly coded into the functionality category. The SUS score of 70.9 was above the usability benchmark for similar platforms. Participants thought they could learn to use DiTA quickly. Since its launch in 2019, DiTA has averaged 88 visits per day, accessed from almost every country in the world, with most users coming from Brazil.
Conclusion: Typical users rated DiTA’s usability as above average, commenting frequently on its content and most often positively. DiTA's functionality was often misinterpreted during search tasks. Nevertheless, participants believed DiTA could be learnt quickly.
{"title":"User experiences of DiTA (dita.org.au): A database of studies of diagnostic test accuracy","authors":"Mark A. Kaizik , Aron S. Downie , Mark J. Hancock , Robert D. Herbert","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101568","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101568","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Background:</em> The DiTA database indexes primary studies and systematic reviews of the accuracy of diagnostic tests related to physical therapy; however, its usability has not been previously assessed.</div><div><em>Objective:</em> (i) To assess the usability (layout, navigation, functionality, content) of DiTA</div><div>for typical users working within physical therapy; (ii) to report the volume of user interaction with DiTA.</div><div><em>Methods:</em> A Think Aloud usability testing protocol was employed with 25 participants during screenshare teleconference interviews while performing DiTA search tasks. Participants then completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) online. Participants’ comments and interpretations from transcribed interviews were coded into four usability categories. Anonymous data on website user behaviour since DiTA’s inception were collected. The main outcome measures were frequency of comments per category with interpretations made during interviews, and SUS usability scores.</div><div><em>Results:</em> Participants most often commented about content (49 % of total), typically with positive sentiment. Participants also frequently commented on DiTA’s functionality typically with negative sentiment. Misinterpretations during search tasks were commonly coded into the functionality category. The SUS score of 70.9 was above the usability benchmark for similar platforms. Participants thought they could learn to use DiTA quickly. Since its launch in 2019, DiTA has averaged 88 visits per day, accessed from almost every country in the world, with most users coming from Brazil.</div><div><em>Conclusion:</em> Typical users rated DiTA’s usability as above average, commenting frequently on its content and most often positively. DiTA's functionality was often misinterpreted during search tasks. Nevertheless, participants believed DiTA could be learnt quickly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101568"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145841607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101565
Milena Dietrich Deitos Rosa , Lidiane Lima Florencio , Jene Caroline Silva Marçal , Fabíola Dach , Domingo Palacios-Ceña , Debora Bevilaqua-Grossi
Background
Neck pain is a common symptom in individuals with migraine, often leading to a more severe clinical presentation. However, despite the established relationship, uncertainties remain regarding its impact on patients.
Objective
To explore the relevance of neck pain in patients with migraine by describing their perceptions, beliefs, and coping strategies.
Methods
This qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory study followed the COREQ and SRQR criteria. Twenty-seven individuals with an average age of 35.4 years, diagnosed with migraine according to the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, and self-reporting neck pain were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Thematic analysis was used to identify, organize, and describe the data. The entire process of coding, categorization, and theme development was conducted using Excel.
Results
Three main themes were identified: pain characteristics, pain triggers, and coping strategies. Patients described their pain with varying characteristics and associated emotions. Although the pain caused discomfort, it did not interfere with daily activities. Opinions differed regarding the cause of neck pain and the strategies for managing it.
Conclusion
Neck pain is prevalent and a relevant symptom for patients with migraine. They expressed differing opinions and uncertainties about its real cause and appropriate management. These findings underscore the importance of assessing the craniocervical system in clinical practice, providing appropriate guidance and treatment, and encouraging informed decision-making
{"title":"The experience of neck pain in people with migraine: A qualitative study","authors":"Milena Dietrich Deitos Rosa , Lidiane Lima Florencio , Jene Caroline Silva Marçal , Fabíola Dach , Domingo Palacios-Ceña , Debora Bevilaqua-Grossi","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101565","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101565","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neck pain is a common symptom in individuals with migraine, often leading to a more severe clinical presentation. However, despite the established relationship, uncertainties remain regarding its impact on patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the relevance of neck pain in patients with migraine by describing their perceptions, beliefs, and coping strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory study followed the COREQ and SRQR criteria. Twenty-seven individuals with an average age of 35.4 years, diagnosed with migraine according to the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, and self-reporting neck pain were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Thematic analysis was used to identify, organize, and describe the data. The entire process of coding, categorization, and theme development was conducted using Excel.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three main themes were identified: pain characteristics, pain triggers, and coping strategies. Patients described their pain with varying characteristics and associated emotions. Although the pain caused discomfort, it did not interfere with daily activities. Opinions differed regarding the cause of neck pain and the strategies for managing it.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Neck pain is prevalent and a relevant symptom for patients with migraine. They expressed differing opinions and uncertainties about its real cause and appropriate management. These findings underscore the importance of assessing the craniocervical system in clinical practice, providing appropriate guidance and treatment, and encouraging informed decision-making</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101565"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145828926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101562
Guan-Cheng Zhu , Jun-Hui Ong , Ching-Hsia Hung
Background
Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) causes significant pain and disability in patients. Current conservative treatment for PVD is often limited to physical exercise. However, several recent studies have investigated the effects of physical therapy modalities in patients with PVD.
Objective
This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the effects of different physical therapy modalities and physical exercise in improving the walking function of patients with PVD.
Methods
This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, NMA extension. We searched six databases for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 2013–2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials version 2 (RoB2). MetaInsight and R were used to conduct the NMA.
Results
We analyzed 21 studies in the NMA. The results showed that shockwave therapy (SMD = 1.41, 95 %CI (0.58, 2.24)) and vacuum therapy (SMD = 0.72, 95 %CI (0.16, 1.29)) were effective independently in improving the walking function of patients with PVD. Combined hydrotherapy and exercise programs also performed better than exercise-only programs (SMD = 0.74, 95 %CI (0.38, 1.09)). While electrotherapy yielded a significant effect when performed independently (SMD = 1.43, 95 %CI (0.53, 2.33)), but was not effective when combined with exercise.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that shockwave and vacuum therapy can be used as a treatment for patients with PVD who have difficulties participating in physical exercise. Hydrotherapy could assist patients participating in physical exercise programs to achieve better outcomes.
This study was registered in the PROSPERO database CRD42023461442.
{"title":"Comparing the effects of different physical therapy modalities with physical exercise in improving the walking function of patients with peripheral vascular disease: A Network Meta-analysis","authors":"Guan-Cheng Zhu , Jun-Hui Ong , Ching-Hsia Hung","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101562","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101562","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) causes significant pain and disability in patients. Current conservative treatment for PVD is often limited to physical exercise. However, several recent studies have investigated the effects of physical therapy modalities in patients with PVD.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the effects of different physical therapy modalities and physical exercise in improving the walking function of patients with PVD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, NMA extension. We searched six databases for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between 2013–2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials version 2 (RoB2). MetaInsight and R were used to conduct the NMA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 21 studies in the NMA. The results showed that shockwave therapy (SMD = 1.41, 95 %CI (0.58, 2.24)) and vacuum therapy (SMD = 0.72, 95 %CI (0.16, 1.29)) were effective independently in improving the walking function of patients with PVD. Combined hydrotherapy and exercise programs also performed better than exercise-only programs (SMD = 0.74, 95 %CI (0.38, 1.09)). While electrotherapy yielded a significant effect when performed independently (SMD = 1.43, 95 %CI (0.53, 2.33)), but was not effective when combined with exercise.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings suggest that shockwave and vacuum therapy can be used as a treatment for patients with PVD who have difficulties participating in physical exercise. Hydrotherapy could assist patients participating in physical exercise programs to achieve better outcomes.</div><div>This study was registered in the PROSPERO database CRD42023461442.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101562"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145794886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101564
André Pontes-Silva , André Luiz Lopes
Greater amounts of human movement involve greater amounts of physical work and, consequently, greater metabolic energy expenditure. Therefore, when comparing the effects of different exercise interventions, it is imperative to understand, delineate, and assess the cumulative effort induced by each exercise intervention tested. However, few clinical trials use an exercise program that controls for this variable in their intervention. This methodological flaw raises an important question: is it possible to determine which type of exercise is effective (for a given outcome) without knowing which type of exercise tested produced the most total work? The answer is simple: no! Because different exercises produce similar musculoskeletal adaptations, the difference is in the total work. Therefore, we aimed to present a way of comparing different types of physical exercise: the total work equalization.
{"title":"Total work equalization: a mathematical strategy for the comparison of different exercises in clinical trials","authors":"André Pontes-Silva , André Luiz Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101564","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101564","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Greater amounts of human movement involve greater amounts of physical work and, consequently, greater metabolic energy expenditure. Therefore, when comparing the effects of different exercise interventions, it is imperative to understand, delineate, and assess the cumulative effort induced by each exercise intervention tested. However, few clinical trials use an exercise program that controls for this variable in their intervention. This methodological flaw raises an important question: is it possible to determine which type of exercise is effective (for a given outcome) without knowing which type of exercise tested produced the most total work? The answer is simple: no! Because different exercises produce similar musculoskeletal adaptations, the difference is in the total work. Therefore, we aimed to present a way of comparing different types of physical exercise: the total work equalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101564"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145794815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
There is limited research on cyclists with a history of exercise associated muscle cramps (hEAMC) defined as muscle cramping (painful, spontaneous, sustained spasm of a muscle) during or after cycling.
Objective
To determine the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and risk factors associated with hEAMC in cyclists taking part in a mass participation cycling event.
Methods
21,460 race entrants from the 2016 Cape Town Cycle Tour completed an online questionnaire, which is based on the guidelines for recreational exercise participation from the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation [EACPR]. The main outcome measures were: the lifetime prevalence hEAMC (%; 95% confidence intervals), independent risk factors (adjusted for age and sex) associated with hEAMC (history of chronic disease, history of allergies, history of chronic medication use, history of medication use before and during race, history of cycling injuries, and cycling training/racing variables). Poisson regression was used to calculate the prevalence (%) of the variables of interest, with 95% confidence intervals.
Results
The retrospective lifetime prevalence of hEAMC was 30.51%. EAMC in cyclists affects mainly the quadriceps muscles and occurs in the 4th quarter during a race. Novel independent risk factors associated with an increased risk of hEAMC in cyclists were: increased number of years participating as a recreational cyclist (PR=1.03 per 5 years increase; p<0.0001), a higher chronic disease composite score (PR=1.36 times increased risk for every 2 additional chronic diseases; p<0.0001), a history of any allergies (PR=1.18; p<0.0001), medication use before or during event (PR=1.41; p<0.0001) a history of an acute (PR=1.30; p<0.0001) and gradual onset injury (PR=1.29; p<0.0001).
Conclusion
Our study identified novel independent risk factors associated with a hEAMC. These results, in combination with other known risk factors, could assist future targeted prevention programmes and the management of EAMC in recreational cyclists.
{"title":"Independent risk factors associated with a history of exercise associated muscle cramps (EAMC) among 21460 cycling race entrants (SAFER XXXVI): a descriptive cross-sectional study","authors":"Carey Pohl , Martin Schwellnus , Nicola Sewry , Pieter Boer , Esme Jordaan , Carel Viljoen","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101559","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101559","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is limited research on cyclists with a history of exercise associated muscle cramps (hEAMC) defined as muscle cramping (painful, spontaneous, sustained spasm of a muscle) during or after cycling.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and risk factors associated with hEAMC in cyclists taking part in a mass participation cycling event.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>21,460 race entrants from the 2016 Cape Town Cycle Tour completed an online questionnaire, which is based on the guidelines for recreational exercise participation from the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation [EACPR]. The main outcome measures were: the lifetime prevalence hEAMC (%; 95% confidence intervals), independent risk factors (adjusted for age and sex) associated with hEAMC (history of chronic disease, history of allergies, history of chronic medication use, history of medication use before and during race, history of cycling injuries, and cycling training/racing variables). Poisson regression was used to calculate the prevalence (%) of the variables of interest, with 95% confidence intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The retrospective lifetime prevalence of hEAMC was 30.51%. EAMC in cyclists affects mainly the quadriceps muscles and occurs in the 4th quarter during a race. Novel independent risk factors associated with an increased risk of hEAMC in cyclists were: increased number of years participating as a recreational cyclist (PR=1.03 per 5 years increase; p<0.0001), a higher chronic disease composite score (PR=1.36 times increased risk for every 2 additional chronic diseases; p<0.0001), a history of any allergies (PR=1.18; p<0.0001), medication use before or during event (PR=1.41; p<0.0001) a history of an acute (PR=1.30; p<0.0001) and gradual onset injury (PR=1.29; p<0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study identified novel independent risk factors associated with a hEAMC. These results, in combination with other known risk factors, could assist future targeted prevention programmes and the management of EAMC in recreational cyclists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101559"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145765697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101561
Fernanda Belle , Elisa Mitkus Flores Lins , Josiel Mileno Mack , Francielly Suzaine da Silva , Ludmilla Solange Gelain , Verônica Vargas Horewicz , Guilherme de Azevedo Traebert , Alexandre Carlos Buffon , Deborah de Camargo Hizume-Kunzler , Daniel Fernandes Martins , Franciane Bobinski
Background
Physical exercise is widely recognized for reducing neuropathic pain. However, the interaction between the immune and opioidergic systems in supraspinal structures is still not fully understood.
Objective
To evaluate the impact of opioid receptor blockade on the effects of low-intensity exercise on the sensory, cognitive, and emotional aspects of neuropathic pain after sciatic nerve injury.
Methods
Male Swiss mice (2 months old) were submitted to sciatic nerve crush and divided into sedentary or exercised groups. The exercised groups performed treadmill running for two weeks, with or without naloxone pre-treatment to block opioid receptors. Sensory responses were assessed using the von Frey test, while cognitive and emotional-like behaviors were evaluated through the Mechanical Conflict-Avoidance System (MCAS) and open field test, respectively. Cytokine levels (IL-4, IL-10) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were quantified in the brainstem and prefrontal cortex by ELISA.
Results
Exercise reduced mechanical hypersensitivity and improved performance in cognitive and exploratory tasks. These effects were prevented by naloxone administration. Exercise also increased IL-4, IL-10, and BDNF levels in supraspinal regions, while naloxone reversed these changes, indicating the involvement of μ-opioid receptors in exercise-induced immunomodulation.
Conclusion
Low-intensity exercise promotes analgesia and neuroimmune regulation in neuropathic pain through supraspinal μ-opioid receptor activation. The blockade of these receptors abolishes the beneficial effects of exercise, reinforcing the interaction between opioidergic and immune systems in pain modulation.
{"title":"Blockade of opioid receptors prevents the effect of exercise on neuropathic pain in mice, promoting immunoregulation in the brainstem and prefrontal cortex","authors":"Fernanda Belle , Elisa Mitkus Flores Lins , Josiel Mileno Mack , Francielly Suzaine da Silva , Ludmilla Solange Gelain , Verônica Vargas Horewicz , Guilherme de Azevedo Traebert , Alexandre Carlos Buffon , Deborah de Camargo Hizume-Kunzler , Daniel Fernandes Martins , Franciane Bobinski","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101561","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101561","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical exercise is widely recognized for reducing neuropathic pain. However, the interaction between the immune and opioidergic systems in supraspinal structures is still not fully understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of opioid receptor blockade on the effects of low-intensity exercise on the sensory, cognitive, and emotional aspects of neuropathic pain after sciatic nerve injury.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Male Swiss mice (2 months old) were submitted to sciatic nerve crush and divided into sedentary or exercised groups. The exercised groups performed treadmill running for two weeks, with or without naloxone pre-treatment to block opioid receptors. Sensory responses were assessed using the von Frey test, while cognitive and emotional-like behaviors were evaluated through the Mechanical Conflict-Avoidance System (MCAS) and open field test, respectively. Cytokine levels (IL-4, IL-10) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were quantified in the brainstem and prefrontal cortex by ELISA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exercise reduced mechanical hypersensitivity and improved performance in cognitive and exploratory tasks. These effects were prevented by naloxone administration. Exercise also increased IL-4, IL-10, and BDNF levels in supraspinal regions, while naloxone reversed these changes, indicating the involvement of μ-opioid receptors in exercise-induced immunomodulation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Low-intensity exercise promotes analgesia and neuroimmune regulation in neuropathic pain through supraspinal μ-opioid receptor activation. The blockade of these receptors abolishes the beneficial effects of exercise, reinforcing the interaction between opioidergic and immune systems in pain modulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145765698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-18DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101560
Ivan de Araujo Barros , Arthur de Sá Ferreira , Thaís de Souza Horsth , Thamires de Jesus Holmes , Anna Amalheiro dos Santos , Luciana Crepaldi Lunkes
Introduction
Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. The health locus of control (HLC) refers to the individual's perception of control over their health, which can be internal (personal control), external (control attributed to others), or chance (determined by luck, fate, or chance).
Objective
To investigate whether the HLC predicts pain, functional ability, and global perceived effect in patients with CNLBP treated with active versus passive interventions.
Methods
Longitudinal observational study following two different treatments groups delivered by physical therapists: active group (exercise-based intervention) and passive group (manual therapy-based intervention). The HLC was assessed with the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale (MHLCS), pain with the Pain Numerical Rating Scale (PNRS), functional ability with the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), and global perceived effect by the Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES). The relationship between the types of HLC at baseline and after the intervention was analyzed by the Chi-square test, and the prediction of outcomes by linear regression (p < 0.05).
Results
Fifty-eight individuals participated, with a mean age of 51.2 (5.6) years. There was no impact of baseline HLC on pain, functional ability, or global perceived effect (p > 0.05), and there were no significant changes in HLC at the endpoint of observation (p = 0.75).
Conclusion
HLC was not a predictor for the evaluated outcomes, with no significant changes between baseline and the endpoint of observation.
慢性非特异性腰痛(CNLBP)是全球致残的主要原因。健康控制点(health locus of control, HLC)是指个体对自身健康控制的感知,这种控制可以是内部(个人控制)、外部(归因于他人的控制)或偶然(由运气、命运或机会决定)。目的探讨HLC是否能预测CNLBP患者接受主动和被动干预后的疼痛、功能能力和整体感知效果。方法采用纵向观察研究方法,观察由物理治疗师提供的两个不同治疗组:主动组(以运动为基础的干预)和被动组(以手工治疗为基础的干预)。采用多维健康控制点量表(MHLCS)、疼痛评定量表(PNRS)、功能能力评定量表(PSFS)和整体感知效应量表(GPES)对患者的整体感知效应进行评估。采用卡方检验分析干预前后HLC类型的关系,采用线性回归预测结果(p < 0.05)。结果58人参与,平均年龄51.2(5.6)岁。基线HLC对疼痛、功能能力或整体感知效果无影响(p > 0.05),观察终点时HLC无显著变化(p = 0.75)。结论hplc不是评估结果的预测因子,在基线和观察终点之间没有显著变化。
{"title":"Type of health locus of control predicting pain, function, and global perceived effect in patients with chronic low back pain receiving active versus passive interventions: an observational study","authors":"Ivan de Araujo Barros , Arthur de Sá Ferreira , Thaís de Souza Horsth , Thamires de Jesus Holmes , Anna Amalheiro dos Santos , Luciana Crepaldi Lunkes","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101560","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101560","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. The health locus of control (HLC) refers to the individual's perception of control over their health, which can be internal (personal control), external (control attributed to others), or chance (determined by luck, fate, or chance).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate whether the HLC predicts pain, functional ability, and global perceived effect in patients with CNLBP treated with active versus passive interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Longitudinal observational study following two different treatments groups delivered by physical therapists: active group (exercise-based intervention) and passive group (manual therapy-based intervention). The HLC was assessed with the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale (MHLCS), pain with the Pain Numerical Rating Scale (PNRS), functional ability with the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), and global perceived effect by the Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES). The relationship between the types of HLC at baseline and after the intervention was analyzed by the Chi-square test, and the prediction of outcomes by linear regression (<em>p</em> < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-eight individuals participated, with a mean age of 51.2 (5.6) years. There was no impact of baseline HLC on pain, functional ability, or global perceived effect (<em>p</em> > 0.05), and there were no significant changes in HLC at the endpoint of observation (<em>p</em> = 0.75).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>HLC was not a predictor for the evaluated outcomes, with no significant changes between baseline and the endpoint of observation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 101560"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145765696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}