Perceived Challenges to Tribally Led Shellfish Toxin Testing in Southeast Alaska: Findings From Key Informant Interviews

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Geohealth Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1029/2023GH000988
Hugh B. Roland, Jacob Kohlhoff, Kari Lanphier, Sneha Hoysala, Esther G. Kennedy, John Harley, Christopher Whitehead, Matthew O. Gribble
{"title":"Perceived Challenges to Tribally Led Shellfish Toxin Testing in Southeast Alaska: Findings From Key Informant Interviews","authors":"Hugh B. Roland,&nbsp;Jacob Kohlhoff,&nbsp;Kari Lanphier,&nbsp;Sneha Hoysala,&nbsp;Esther G. Kennedy,&nbsp;John Harley,&nbsp;Christopher Whitehead,&nbsp;Matthew O. Gribble","doi":"10.1029/2023GH000988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Shellfish harvesting is central to coastal Alaska Native ways of life, and tribes in Southeast Alaska are committed to preserving sustainable and safe access to subsistence foods. However, consumption of non-commercially harvested shellfish puts Alaska Native communities at elevated risk of exposure to shellfish toxins. To address a lack of state or federal toxin testing for subsistence and recreational harvesting, tribes across Southeast Alaska have formed their own toxin testing and ocean monitoring program. In this study, we interviewed environmental managers responsible for tribes' testing and others with shellfish toxin expertise to report on perceptions of barriers to tribally led testing in Southeast Alaska. Tribal staff identified 40 prospective key informants to interview, including all environmental managers responsible for shellfish toxin testing at subsistence sites in Southeast Alaska. All 40 individuals were invited to participate in an interview and 27 individuals were interviewed. The most frequently discussed barriers to shellfish toxin testing in Southeast Alaska relate to logistical and staffing difficulties associated with communities' remote locations, inconsistent and inadequate funding and funding structures that increase staff burdens, risk communication challenges related to conveying exposure risks while supporting subsistence harvesting, and implications of climate change-related shifts in toxin exposures for risk perception and risk communication. Participants stressed the social origins of perceived barriers. Disinvestment may create and sustain barriers and be most severely felt in Native communities and remote places. Climate change impacts may interact with social and cultural factors to further complicate risk management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GH000988","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GH000988","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shellfish harvesting is central to coastal Alaska Native ways of life, and tribes in Southeast Alaska are committed to preserving sustainable and safe access to subsistence foods. However, consumption of non-commercially harvested shellfish puts Alaska Native communities at elevated risk of exposure to shellfish toxins. To address a lack of state or federal toxin testing for subsistence and recreational harvesting, tribes across Southeast Alaska have formed their own toxin testing and ocean monitoring program. In this study, we interviewed environmental managers responsible for tribes' testing and others with shellfish toxin expertise to report on perceptions of barriers to tribally led testing in Southeast Alaska. Tribal staff identified 40 prospective key informants to interview, including all environmental managers responsible for shellfish toxin testing at subsistence sites in Southeast Alaska. All 40 individuals were invited to participate in an interview and 27 individuals were interviewed. The most frequently discussed barriers to shellfish toxin testing in Southeast Alaska relate to logistical and staffing difficulties associated with communities' remote locations, inconsistent and inadequate funding and funding structures that increase staff burdens, risk communication challenges related to conveying exposure risks while supporting subsistence harvesting, and implications of climate change-related shifts in toxin exposures for risk perception and risk communication. Participants stressed the social origins of perceived barriers. Disinvestment may create and sustain barriers and be most severely felt in Native communities and remote places. Climate change impacts may interact with social and cultural factors to further complicate risk management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉斯加东南部由部落主导的贝类毒素检测所面临的挑战:关键信息提供者访谈结果
贝类捕捞是阿拉斯加沿海原住民生活方式的核心,阿拉斯加东南部的部落致力于保护可持续和安全地获取自给食品。然而,食用非商业捕捞的贝类会使阿拉斯加原住民社区暴露于贝类毒素的风险升高。为了解决州或联邦对自给性和娱乐性捕捞缺乏毒素检测的问题,阿拉斯加东南部的各部落已经形成了自己的毒素检测和海洋监测计划。在这项研究中,我们采访了负责部落检测的环境管理人员和其他具有贝类毒素专业知识的人员,以报告他们对阿拉斯加东南部由部落主导的检测所面临的障碍的看法。部落工作人员确定了 40 位潜在的关键信息提供者进行访谈,其中包括负责阿拉斯加东南部生计场所贝类毒素检测的所有环境管理人员。所有 40 人都被邀请参加访谈,其中 27 人接受了访谈。最常讨论的阿拉斯加东南部贝类毒素检测障碍涉及与社区偏远位置相关的后勤和人员配备困难、不一致和不充足的资金以及增加工作人员负担的资金结构、与传达暴露风险同时支持自给性捕捞相关的风险交流挑战,以及与气候变化相关的毒素暴露变化对风险认知和风险交流的影响。与会者强调了感知障碍的社会根源。投资不足可能会造成和维持障碍,在原住民社区和偏远地区的感受最为强烈。气候变化的影响可能与社会和文化因素相互作用,使风险管理更加复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geohealth
Geohealth Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Planetary Health Booms: Unpacking the Surge in Research Across the Globe Through Joint-Point Analysis Satellite-Derived, Smartphone-Delivered Geospatial Cholera Risk Information for Vulnerable Populations Upstream Oil and Gas Production and Community COVID-19 Case and Mortality Rates in California, USA Association of Long-Term Exposure to PM2.5 Constituents and Green Space With Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Methods for Quantifying Source-Specific Air Pollution Exposure to Serve Epidemiology, Risk Assessment, and Environmental Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1